Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Online Information Acquisition: Hiring Multiple Agents (2307.06210v1)

Published 12 Jul 2023 in cs.GT

Abstract: We investigate the mechanism design problem faced by a principal who hires \emph{multiple} agents to gather and report costly information. Then, the principal exploits the information to make an informed decision. We model this problem as a game, where the principal announces a mechanism consisting in action recommendations and a payment function, a.k.a. scoring rule. Then, each agent chooses an effort level and receives partial information about an underlying state of nature based on the effort. Finally, the agents report the information (possibly non-truthfully), the principal takes a decision based on this information, and the agents are paid according to the scoring rule. While previous work focuses on single-agent problems, we consider multi-agents settings. This poses the challenge of coordinating the agents' efforts and aggregating correlated information. Indeed, we show that optimal mechanisms must correlate agents' efforts, which introduces externalities among the agents, and hence complex incentive compatibility constraints and equilibrium selection problems. First, we design a polynomial-time algorithm to find an optimal incentive compatible mechanism. Then, we study an online problem, where the principal repeatedly interacts with a group of unknown agents. We design a no-regret algorithm that provides $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T{2/3})$ regret with respect to an optimal mechanism, matching the state-of-the-art bound for single-agent settings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. Contracts with private cost per unit-of-effort. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 52–69, 2021.
  2. Combinatorial agency. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(3):999–1034, 2012.
  3. Online mechanism design for information acquisition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02873, 2023.
  4. Designing menus of contracts efficiently: The power of randomization. In EC ’22: The 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 705–735, 2022a.
  5. Bayesian agency: Linear versus tractable contracts. Artificial Intelligence, 307, 2022b.
  6. Learning to incentivize information acquisition: Proper scoring rules meet principal-agent model, 2023.
  7. Optimal scoring rule design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07420, 2021.
  8. The complexity of computing a nash equilibrium. Communications of the ACM, 52(2):89–97, 2009.
  9. Simple versus optimal contracts. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 369–387, 2019.
  10. The complexity of contracts. SIAM Journal on Computing, 50(1):211–254, 2021.
  11. Contracts under moral hazard and adverse selection. In EC ’21: The 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 563–582, 2021.
  12. Optimization of scoring rules. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 988–989, 2022.
  13. Binary scoring rules that incentivize precision. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 718–733, 2021.
  14. Minimum-regret contracts for principal-expert problems. In Web and Internet Economics: 16th International Conference, WINE 2020, Beijing, China, December 7–11, 2020, Proceedings 16, pages 430–443. Springer, 2020.
  15. Maneesha Papireddygari and Bo Waggoner. Contracts with information acquisition, via scoring rules. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 703–704, 2022.
  16. Leonard J Savage. Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336):783–801, 1971.
  17. The sample complexity of online contract design, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Federico Cacciamani (8 papers)
  2. Matteo Castiglioni (60 papers)
  3. Nicola Gatti (90 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.