Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

RoCo: Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with Large Language Models (2307.04738v1)

Published 10 Jul 2023 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.LG
RoCo: Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with Large Language Models

Abstract: We propose a novel approach to multi-robot collaboration that harnesses the power of pre-trained LLMs for both high-level communication and low-level path planning. Robots are equipped with LLMs to discuss and collectively reason task strategies. They then generate sub-task plans and task space waypoint paths, which are used by a multi-arm motion planner to accelerate trajectory planning. We also provide feedback from the environment, such as collision checking, and prompt the LLM agents to improve their plan and waypoints in-context. For evaluation, we introduce RoCoBench, a 6-task benchmark covering a wide range of multi-robot collaboration scenarios, accompanied by a text-only dataset for agent representation and reasoning. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach -- it achieves high success rates across all tasks in RoCoBench and adapts to variations in task semantics. Our dialog setup offers high interpretability and flexibility -- in real world experiments, we show RoCo easily incorporates human-in-the-loop, where a user can communicate and collaborate with a robot agent to complete tasks together. See project website https://project-roco.github.io for videos and code.

Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with LLMs

The research presented in "RoCo: Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with LLMs" by Zhao Mandi, Shreeya Jain, and Shuran Song proposes a novel approach to multi-robot collaboration. This methodology employs LLMs for coordinating task strategies and planning motion trajectories in a zero-shot setting. Given the increasing complexity of tasks requiring multi-robot systems, this approach aims to enhance both high-level strategy formation and low-level trajectory planning, addressing limitations traditional systems face in adaptability and generalization.

Methodological Advancements

The paper introduces a multi-faceted approach centered on integrating LLMs into multi-robot systems:

  1. Dialogue-Based Coordination: Each robot is equipped with an LLM agent, allowing for natural language dialogues to coordinate tasks. This involves the exchange of high-level strategies via a structured dialogue, reflecting each robot’s capabilities and task contexts. The dialogue-based coordination purportedly enhances interpretability and facilitates human-over-the-loop monitoring.
  2. Feedback-Driven Sub-Task Planning: LLM agents collaboratively generate sub-task plans, which are iteratively refined based on feedback from environmental interaction checks, such as inverse kinematics (IK) and collision avoidance results. This iterative feedback loop is posited to improve both the feasibility and safety of the generated plans.
  3. LLM-Informed Motion Planning: Transitioning from validated sub-task plans, the methodology uses LLMs for generating motion waypoint paths that inform joint spaces for motion planning. The capability of LLMs to handle 3D spatial reasoning offers potential reductions in sampling complexity during path planning.

Experimental Results

The introduction of RoCoBench, a 6-task benchmark crafted to evaluate the proposed approach's efficacy across diverse multi-robot collaboration scenarios, supports this research’s evaluative claims. Notably, RoCo demonstrates high success rates across all tasks with appreciable adaptability to semantic variations, indicating the robustness and flexibility of LLM-driven coordination strategies.

The results also reveal intriguing insights into the practical capabilities of LLMs in non-traditional roles, such as 3D path planning, and highlight the effectiveness of dialogue-driven task planning over centralized planning schemes in dynamic environments. The evaluation metrics focus on success rates, task completion efficiency, and adaptability to environmental feedback, thereby confirming the potential of RoCo in real-world task scenarios.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research extend to both theoretical advancements and practical applications. Theoretically, it introduces novel intersections between natural language processing and embodied AI systems, leveraging LLMs for tasks traditionally dominated by explicit task-engineered solutions. Practically, the success of RoCo can inspire broader adoption of LLMs in robotics, particularly for tasks involving dynamic environments and unstructured interactions.

Future research may explore enhancements in LLM model efficiencies specific to robotic applications, adaptations for real-time tasks, or integrative frameworks that combine LLMs with computer vision models for autonomous task perception and execution in dynamic real-world contexts. Further investigation into addressing limitations observed in open-loop execution and perceptual inaccuracies may also significantly enhance practical applications.

In summary, this paper contributes a robust framework that significantly advances multi-robot collaboration using state-of-the-art LLMs, paving the way for future exploration and integration of language and planning in intelligent robotic systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. ArXiv, abs/2303.08774, 2023.
  2. Simple open-vocabulary object detection with vision transformers, 2022.
  3. A. LLC. Introducing claude, 2023. URL https://www.anthropic.com/index/introducing-claude.
  4. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances, 2022.
  5. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In Conference on Robot Learning, 2022.
  6. Code as policis: Language model programs for embodied control. In arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07753, 2022.
  7. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11302, 2022.
  8. Demo2code: From summarizing demonstrations to synthesizing code via extended chain-of-thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16744, 2023.
  9. Tidybot: Personalized robot assistance with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05658, 2023.
  10. Instruct2act: Mapping multi-modality instructions to robotic actions with large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11176, 2023.
  11. Text2motion: From natural language instructions to feasible plans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12153, 2023.
  12. Autotamp: Autoregressive task and motion planning with llms as translators and checkers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.06531, 2023.
  13. Task and motion planning with large language models for object rearrangement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06247, 2023.
  14. Visually grounded task and motion planning for mobile manipulation. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1925–1931. IEEE, 2022.
  15. ” no, to the right”–online language corrections for robotic manipulation via shared autonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02555, 2023.
  16. Reward design with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00001, 2023.
  17. Language to rewards for robotic skill synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08647, 2023.
  18. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378, 2023.
  19. Interactive language: Talking to robots in real time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06407, 2022.
  20. Robotic skill acquisition via instruction augmentation with vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11736, 2022.
  21. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  22. Socratic models: Composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language, 2022.
  23. Chat with the environment: Interactive multimodal perception using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08268, 2023.
  24. Toward grounded social reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08651, 2023.
  25. Alphablock: Embodied finetuning for vision-language reasoning in robot manipulation, 2023.
  26. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07753, 2022.
  27. J. Andreas. Language models as agent models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01681, 2022.
  28. D. Schlangen. Dialogue games for benchmarking language understanding: Motivation, taxonomy, strategy, 2023.
  29. clembench: Using game play to evaluate chat-optimized language models as conversational agents, 2023.
  30. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior, 2023.
  31. Camel: Communicative agents for ”mind” exploration of large scale language model society. ArXiv, abs/2303.17760, 2023.
  32. Training socially aligned language models in simulated human society, 2023.
  33. Ai safety via debate, 2018.
  34. Dera: Enhancing large language model completions with dialog-enabled resolving agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17071, 2023.
  35. Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate. ArXiv, abs/2305.19118, 2023.
  36. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate, 2023.
  37. Y. Koga and J.-C. Latombe. On multi-arm manipulation planning. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 945–952 vol.2, 1994.
  38. S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning, 2011.
  39. A. Dobson and K. E. Bekris. Planning representations and algorithms for prehensile multi-arm manipulation. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 6381–6386. IEEE, 2015.
  40. Learning a decentralized multi-arm motion planner. In Conference on Robotic Learning (CoRL), 2020.
  41. Coordinated multi-arm motion planning: Reaching for moving objects in the face of uncertainty. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2016.
  42. Randomized path planning for linkages with closed kinematic chains. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, 17:951 – 958, 01 2002. doi:10.1109/70.976030.
  43. Closed-chain manipulation of large objects by multi-arm robotic systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2(4):1832–1839, 2017.
  44. Multi-robot grasp planning for sequential assembly operations. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 193–200, 2015. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2015.7138999.
  45. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5026–5033, 2012. doi:10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109.
  46. dm_control: Software and tasks for continuous control. Software Impacts, 6:100022, 2020.
  47. M. M. Contributors. MuJoCo Menagerie: A collection of high-quality simulation models for MuJoCo, 2022. URL http://github.com/deepmind/mujoco_menagerie.
  48. Learning dexterous manipulation from exemplar object trajectories and pre-grasps. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2023, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Zhao Mandi (9 papers)
  2. Shreeya Jain (2 papers)
  3. Shuran Song (110 papers)
Citations (81)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com