Proxy Selection in Transitive Proxy Voting (2307.02627v1)
Abstract: Transitive proxy voting (or "liquid democracy") is a novel form of collective decision making, often framed as an attractive hybrid of direct and representative democracy. Although the ideas behind liquid democracy have garnered widespread support, there have been relatively few attempts to model it formally. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it proposes a new social choice-theoretic model of liquid democracy, which is distinguished by taking a richer formal perspective on the process by which a voter chooses a proxy. Second, it examines the model from an axiomatic perspective, proving (a) a proxy vote analogue of May's Theorem and (b) an impossibility result concerning monotonicity properties in a proxy vote setting. Third, it explores the topic of manipulation in transitive proxy votes. Two forms of manipulation specific to the proxy vote setting are defined, and it is shown that manipulation occurs in strictly more cases in proxy votes than in classical votes.
- “Flexible Representative Democracy: An Introduction with Binary Issues” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019, pp. 3–10 DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/1
- Dan Alger “Voting by proxy” In Public Choice 126, 2006, pp. 1–26 URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-3059-1
- Jan Behrens “The Origins of Liquid Democracy” In The Liquid Democracy Journal 5, 2017, pp. 7–17
- Duncan Black “On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making” In Journal of Political Economy, 1948, pp. 23–34
- Daan Bloembergen, Davide Grossi and Martin Lackner “On Rational Delegations in Liquid Democracy” In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2019, 2019
- Christian Blum and Christina Isabel Zuber “Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives” In Journal of Political Philosophy 24.2, 2016, pp. 162–182 DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12065
- “Viscous Democracy for Social Networks” In Commun. ACM 54.6 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 129–137 DOI: 10.1145/1953122.1953154
- Markus Brill “Interactive Democracy” In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) 2018, 2018, pp. 1183–1187
- “Pairwise Liquid Democracy” In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) 2018 Stockholm, Sweden: AAAI Press, 2018, pp. 137–143 URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3304415.3304436
- “Binary Voting with Delegable Proxy: An Analysis of Liquid Democracy” In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK) 2017, 2017, pp. 134–150 DOI: 10.4204/EPTCS.251.10
- “Proxy Voting for Better Outcomes” In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) 2017 São Paulo, Brazil: International Foundation for Autonomous AgentsMultiagent Systems, 2017, pp. 858–866 URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3091125.3091247
- Bruno Escoffier, Hugo Gilbert and Adèle Pass-Lanneau “The Convergence of Iterative Delegations in Liquid Democracy in a Social Network” In Algorithmic Game Theory Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 284–297
- Allan Gibbard “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result” In Econometrica 41.4 [Wiley, Econometric Society], 1973, pp. 587–601 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914083
- “The Fluid Mechanics of Liquid Democracy” In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE), 2018, pp. 188–202
- James Green-Armytage “Direct voting and proxy voting” In Constitutional Political Economy 26.2, 2015, pp. 190–220 URL: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:copoec:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:190-220
- Anson Kahng, Simon Mackenzie and Ariel Procaccia “Liquid democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective” In Proceedings of 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018
- “Voting behaviour and power in online democracy” In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2015
- “Incentivising Participation in Liquid Democracy with Breadth-First Delegation” In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’20 Auckland, New Zealand: International Foundation for Autonomous AgentsMultiagent Systems, 2020, pp. 638–644
- Anna Litvinenko “Social media and perspectives of liquid democracy: The example of political communication in the pirate party in Germany” In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government (ECEG), 2012, pp. 403–407
- Kenneth O. May “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision” In Econometrica 20.4, 1952, pp. 680–684 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907651
- James C. Miller “A program for direct and proxy voting in the legislative process” In Public Choice 7.1, 1969, pp. 107–113 DOI: 10.1007/BF01718736
- Hervé Moulin “On strategy-proofness and single peakedness” In Public Choice 35.4, 1980, pp. 437–455 DOI: 10.1007/BF00128122
- Dominik Peters “Condorcet’s Principle and the Preference Reversal Paradox” In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK) 2017, 2017, pp. 455–469 DOI: 10.4204/EPTCS.251.34
- “One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness” In International Journal of Game Theory 38.4, 2009, pp. 553–574 DOI: 10.1007/s00182-009-0170-9
- Mark Allen Satterthwaite “Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions” In Journal of Economic Theory 10.2, 1975, pp. 187–217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
- William Zwicker “Introduction to the Theory of Voting” In Handbook of Computational Social Choice Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 23–56 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107446984.003