Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Graph-Ensemble Learning Model for Multi-label Skin Lesion Classification using Dermoscopy and Clinical Images (2307.01704v1)

Published 4 Jul 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: Many skin lesion analysis (SLA) methods recently focused on developing a multi-modal-based multi-label classification method due to two factors. The first is multi-modal data, i.e., clinical and dermoscopy images, which can provide complementary information to obtain more accurate results than single-modal data. The second one is that multi-label classification, i.e., seven-point checklist (SPC) criteria as an auxiliary classification task can not only boost the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma in the deep learning (DL) pipeline but also provide more useful functions to the clinical doctor as it is commonly used in clinical dermatologist's diagnosis. However, most methods only focus on designing a better module for multi-modal data fusion; few methods explore utilizing the label correlation between SPC and skin disease for performance improvement. This study fills the gap that introduces a Graph Convolution Network (GCN) to exploit prior co-occurrence between each category as a correlation matrix into the DL model for the multi-label classification. However, directly applying GCN degraded the performances in our experiments; we attribute this to the weak generalization ability of GCN in the scenario of insufficient statistical samples of medical data. We tackle this issue by proposing a Graph-Ensemble Learning Model (GELN) that views the prediction from GCN as complementary information of the predictions from the fusion model and adaptively fuses them by a weighted averaging scheme, which can utilize the valuable information from GCN while avoiding its negative influences as much as possible. To evaluate our method, we conduct experiments on public datasets. The results illustrate that our GELN can consistently improve the classification performance on different datasets and that the proposed method can achieve state-of-the-art performance in SPC and diagnosis classification.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. A. Herschorn, “Dermoscopy for melanoma detection in family practice,” Can. Family Phys., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 740–745, 2012.
  2. G. Argenziano and H. P. Soyer, “Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions—A valuable tool for early,” Lancet Oncol., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 443–449, Jul. 2001.
  3. L. Yu, H. Chen, Q. Dou, J. Qin, and P. A. Heng, “Automated Melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images via very deep residual networks,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 994–1004, Apr. 2017.
  4. J. P. Zhang, Y. T. Xie, Y. Xia, and C. H. Shen, “Attention residual learning for the skin lesion classification,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2092–2013, Sep. 2019.
  5. J. Kawahara, S. Daneshvar, G. Argenziano, and G. Hamarneh, “Seven-point checklist and skin lesion classification using multitask multimodal neural nets,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informat., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 538–546, Mar. 2019.
  6. J. Yap, W. Yolland, and P. Tschandl, “Multimodal skin lesion classification using deep learning,” Exp. Dermatol., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1261–1267, 2018.
  7. Z. Ge, S. Demyanov, R. Chakravorty, A. Bowling, and R. Garnavi, “Skin disease recognition using deep saliency features and multimodal learning of dermoscopy and clinical images,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 250–258.
  8. L. Bi, D. D. Feng, M. Fulham, and J. Kim, “Multi-label classification of multi-modality skin lesion via hyper-connected convolutional neural network,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 107, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 107502.
  9. Z.-M. Chen, X.-S. Wei, P. Wang, and Y. Guo, “Multi-label image recognition with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2019, pp. 5177–5186.
  10. M. E. Celebi, N. Codella, and A. Halpern, “Dermoscopy image analysis: Overview and future directions,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 474–478, Jan. 2019.
  11. Z. Wu, S. Pan, F. Chen, G. Long, C. Zhang, and P. S. Yu, “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–24, Jan. 2021.
  12. T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., Toulon, France, Apr. 2017
  13. Q. Li, X. Peng, Y. Qiao, and Q. Peng, “Learning label correlations for multi-label image recognition with graph networks,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 138, pp. 378–384, Oct. 2020
  14. Q. Meng and W. Zhang, “Multi-label image classification with attention mechanism and graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia Asia, Beijing, China, Dec. 2019, pp. 1–6.
  15. R. You, Z. Guo, L. Cui, X. Long, Y. Bao, and S. Wen, “Cross-modality attention with semantic graph embedding for multi-label classification,” in Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 34, 2020, pp. 12709–12716.
  16. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 770–778.
  17. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” 2014, arXiv:1412.6980
  18. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2009, pp. 248–255.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Peng Tang (47 papers)
  2. Yang Nan (40 papers)
  3. Tobias Lasser (26 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.