Anonymous and Copy-Robust Delegations for Liquid Democracy (2307.01174v2)
Abstract: Liquid democracy with ranked delegations is a novel voting scheme that unites the practicability of representative democracy with the idealistic appeal of direct democracy: Every voter decides between casting their vote on a question at hand or delegating their voting weight to some other, trusted agent. Delegations are transitive, and since voters may end up in a delegation cycle, they are encouraged to indicate not only a single delegate, but a set of potential delegates and a ranking among them. Based on the delegation preferences of all voters, a delegation rule selects one representative per voter. Previous work has revealed a trade-off between two properties of delegation rules called anonymity and copy-robustness. To overcome this issue we study two fractional delegation rules: Mixed Borda branching, which generalizes a rule satisfying copy-robustness, and the random walk rule, which satisfies anonymity. Using the Markov chain tree theorem, we show that the two rules are in fact equivalent, and simultaneously satisfy generalized versions of the two properties. Combining the same theorem with Fulkerson's algorithm, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm for computing the outcome of the studied delegation rule. This algorithm is of independent interest, having applications in semi-supervised learning and graph theory.
- J. Behrens and B. Swierczek. Preferential delegation and the problem of negative voting weight. The Liquid Democracy Journal, 3:6–34, 2015.
- F. Bersetche. A Voting Power Measure for Liquid Democracy with Multiple Delegation. Technical report, arXiv: 2209.14128 [cs.MA], 2022.
- M. Brill. Interactive democracy. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) Blue Sky Ideas track, pages 1183–1187. IFAAMAS, 2018.
- Liquid democracy with ranked delegations. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 4884–4891. AAAI Press, 2022.
- I. Caragiannis and E. Micha. A contribution to the critique of liquid democracy. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 116–122. IJCAI, 2019.
- Z. Christoff and D. Grossi. Binary voting with delegable proxy: An analysis of liquid democracy. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), pages 134–150, 2017.
- Unravelling multi-agent ranked delegations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36(1):1–35, 2022.
- Power watershed: A unifying graph-based optimization framework. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(7):1384–1399, 2010.
- P. De Leenheer. An Elementary Proof of a Matrix Tree Theorem for Directed Graphs. SIAM Review, 62(3):716–726, 2020.
- J. Degrave. Resolving multi-proxy transitive vote delegation. Technical report, arXiv: 1412.4039 [cs.MA], 2014.
- J. Edmonds. Optimum branchings. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 71(4):233–240, 1967.
- Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019.
- Directed probabilistic watershed. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 20076–20088, 2021.
- D. R. Fulkerson. Packing rooted directed cuts in a weighted directed graph. Mathematical Programming, 6(1):1–13, 1974.
- J. Gathen and J. Gerhard. Modern Computer Algebra. Cambridge University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-1-107-03903-2.
- The fluid mechanics of liquid democracy. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 9(4):1–39, 2021.
- Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society, second edition, 1997.
- Probabilistic reachability for parametric Markov models. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 13(1):3–19, 2011.
- In defense of liquid democracy. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (ACM-EC), 2023. Forthcoming.
- S. Hardt and L. Lopes. Google votes: A liquid democracy experiment on a corporate social network. Technical report, Technical Disclosure Commons, 2015.
- Data structures and algorithms, volume 175. Addison-wesley Boston, 1983.
- Liquid democracy: An algorithmic perspective. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70:1223–1252, 2021.
- N. Kamiyama. Arborescence problems in directed graphs: Theorems and algorithms. Interdisciplinary information sciences, 20(1):51–70, 2014.
- Popular branchings and their dual certificates. Mathematical Programming, 192(1):223–237, 2022.
- Voting behaviour and power in online democracy: A study of liquidfeedback in germany’s pirate party. In International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 208–217, 2015.
- G. Kotsialou and L. Riley. Incentivising participation in liquid democracy with breadth first delegation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 638–644. IFAAMAS, 2020.
- F. Leighton and R. Rivest. Estimating a probability using finite memory. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 32(6):733–742, 1986.
- K. Natsui and K. Takazawa. Finding popular branchings in vertex-weighted digraphs. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference and Workshops on Algorithms and Computation (WALCOM), pages 303–314. Springer, 2022.
- A. Paulin. Ten years of liquid democracy research an overview. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days, 2020.
- J. Pitman and W. Tang. Tree formulas, mean first passage times and Kemeny’s constant of a Markov chain. Bernoulli, 24(3):1942–1972, 2018.
- W. Thomson. On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocation. Social Choice and Welfare, 18(2):327–386, 2001.
- W. Tutte. The dissection of equilateral triangles into equilateral triangles. 44(4):463–482, 1948.