Greedy Selection for Heterogeneous Sensors (2307.00840v2)
Abstract: Simultaneous operation of all sensors in a large-scale sensor network is power-consuming and computationally expensive. Hence, it is desirable to select fewer sensors. A greedy algorithm is widely used for sensor selection in homogeneous networks with a theoretical worst-case performance of (1-1/e) ~ 63% of the optimal performance when optimizing submodular metrics. For heterogeneous sensor networks (HSNs) comprising multiple sets of sensors, most of the existing sensor selection methods optimize the performance constrained by a budget on the total value of the selected sensors. However, in many applications, the number of sensors to select from each set is known apriori, and solutions are not well-explored. For this problem, we propose a joint greedy heterogeneous sensor selection algorithm. Theoretically, we show that the worst-case performance of the proposed algorithm is bounded to 50% of the optimum for submodular cost metrics. In the special case of HSNs with two sensor networks, the performance guarantee can be improved to 63% when the number of sensors to select from one set is much smaller than the other. To validate our results experimentally, we propose a submodular metric based on the frame potential measure that considers both the correlation among the sensor measurements and their heterogeneity. We prove theoretical bounds for the mean squared error of the solution when this performance metric is used. We validate our results through simulation experiments considering both linear and non-linear measurement models corrupted by additive noise and quantization errors. Our experiments show that the proposed algorithm results in 4-10 dB lower error than existing methods.
- S. Constantinos, M. Pattichis, and E. Micheli-Tzanakou, “Medical imaging fusion applications: An overview,” in Conf. Rec. 35th Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst. and Comput., vol. 2, 2001, pp. 1263–1267 vol.2.
- J. Ko, C. Lu, M. B. Srivastava, J. A. Stankovic, A. Terzis, and M. Welsh, “Wireless sensor networks for healthcare,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 1947–1960, 2010.
- H. Alemdar and C. Ersoy, “Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey,” Comput. Netw., vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2688–2710, 2010.
- G. Liu, R. Tan, R. Zhou, G. Xing, W.-Z. Song, and J. M. Lees, “Volcanic earthquake timing using wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Inf. Process. Sensor Netw., New York, NY, USA, 2013, p. 91–102.
- S. Savazzi, U. Spagnolini, L. Goratti, D. Molteni, M. Latva-aho, and M. Nicoli, “Ultra-wide band sensor networks in oil and gas explorations,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 150–160, 2013.
- K. K. Khedo, Y. Bissessur, and D. S. Goolaub, “An inland wireless sensor network system for monitoring seismic activity,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 105, pp. 520–532, 2020.
- J. K. Hart and K. Martinez, “Environmental sensor networks: A revolution in the earth system science?” Earth-Sci. Rev., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 177–191, 2006.
- S. Rajasegarar, T. C. Havens, S. Karunasekera, C. Leckie, J. C. Bezdek, M. Jamriska, A. Gunatilaka, A. Skvortsov, and M. Palaniswami, “High-resolution monitoring of atmospheric pollutants using a system of low-cost sensors,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 3823–3832, 2014.
- A. Bose and K. Clements, “Real-time modeling of power networks,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1607–1622, 1987.
- V. Terzija, G. Valverde, D. Cai, P. Regulski, V. Madani, J. Fitch, S. Skok, M. M. Begovic, and A. Phadke, “Wide-area monitoring, protection, and control of future electric power networks,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2011.
- M. R. Alam, M. B. I. Reaz, and M. A. M. Ali, “A review of smart homes—past, present, and future,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1190–1203, 2012.
- M. Li and H.-J. Lin, “Design and implementation of smart home control systems based on wireless sensor networks and power line communications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 4430–4442, 2015.
- F. Viani, F. Robol, A. Polo, P. Rocca, G. Oliveri, and A. Massa, “Wireless architectures for heterogeneous sensing in smart home applications: Concepts and real implementation,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 2381–2396, 2013.
- G. W. Peters, I. Nevat, and T. Matsui, “How to utilize sensor network data to efficiently perform model calibration and spatial field reconstruction,” in Modern Methodology and Appl. Spatial-Temporal Model. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2015, pp. 25–62.
- P. Zhang, I. Nevat, G. W. Peters, F. Septier, and M. A. Osborne, “Spatial field reconstruction and sensor selection in heterogeneous sensor networks with stochastic energy harvesting,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 2245–2257, 2018.
- M. Sviridenko, “A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint,” Operations Res. Lett., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 41–43, 2004.
- M. Sviridenko, J. Vondrák, and J. Ward, “Optimal approximation for submodular and supermodular optimization with bounded curvature,” Math. Oper. Res., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1197–1218, 2017.
- A. Badanidiyuru and J. Vondrák, “Fast algorithms for maximizing submodular functions,” in Proc. 2014 Annu. ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms, 2014, pp. 1497–1514.
- S. Joshi and S. Boyd, “Sensor selection via convex optimization,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 451–462, 2009.
- S. P. Chepuri and G. Leus, “Sparsity-promoting sensor selection for non-linear measurement models,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 684–698, 2015.
- P. Chiu and F. Lin, “A simulated annealing algorithm to support the sensor placement for target location,” in Can. Conf. Elect. Comput. Eng. 2004, vol. 2, 2004, pp. 867–870 Vol.2.
- M. Al-Obaidy, A. Ayesh, and A. F. Sheta, “Optimizing the communication distance of an ad hoc wireless sensor networks by genetic algorithms,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 183–194, 2008.
- R. Mukherjee and S. O. Memik, “Systematic temperature sensor allocation and placement for microprocessors,” in Proc. 43rd Annu. Des. Automat. Conf., New York, NY, USA, 2006, p. 542–547.
- D. J. C. MacKay, “Information-Based Objective Functions for Active Data Selection,” Neural Comput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 590–604, 07 1992.
- H. Wang, K. Yao, G. Pottie, and D. Estrin, “Entropy-based sensor selection heuristic for target localization,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Inf. Process. Sensor Netw., New York, NY, USA, 2004, p. 36–45.
- G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey, and M. L. Fisher, “An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—i,” Math. Program., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 265–294, 1978.
- B. Mirzasoleiman, A. Badanidiyuru, A. Karbasi, J. Vondrak, and A. Krause, “Lazier than lazy greedy,” Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 29, no. 1, Feb. 2015.
- A. Hashemi, M. Ghasemi, H. Vikalo, and U. Topcu, “Randomized greedy sensor selection: Leveraging weak submodularity,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 199–212, 2020.
- L. A. Wolsey, “An analysis of the greedy algorithm for the submodular set covering problem,” Combinatorica, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 385–393, 1982.
- H. Lin and J. Bilmes, “Multi-document summarization via budgeted maximization of submodular functions,” in Human Lang. Technol.: Annu. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, 2010, pp. 912–920.
- Z. Esmaeilbeig, K. V. Mishra, A. Eamaz, and M. Soltanalian, “Submodular optimization for placement of intelligent reflecting surfaces in sensing systems,” in IEEE Int. Workshop Comput. Adv. Multi-Sensor Adaptive Process. (CAMSAP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 401–405.
- M. R. Kirchner, J. P. Hespanha, and D. Garagić, “Heterogeneous measurement selection for vehicle tracking using submodular optimization,” in 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conf., 2020, pp. 1–10.
- H. Zhang, R. Ayoub, and S. Sundaram, “Sensor selection for kalman filtering of linear dynamical systems: Complexity, limitations and greedy algorithms,” Automatica, vol. 78, pp. 202–210, 2017.
- O. M. Bushnaq, A. Chaaban, S. P. Chepuri, G. Leus, and T. Y. Al-Naffouri, “Sensor placement and resource allocation for energy harvesting IoT networks,” Digital Signal Process., vol. 105, p. 102659, 2020, special Issue on Optimum Sparse Arrays and Sensor Placement for Environmental Sensing.
- J. Ranieri, A. Chebira, and M. Vetterli, “Near-optimal sensor placement for linear inverse problems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1135–1146, 2014.
- E. Tohidi, M. Coutino, S. P. Chepuri, H. Behroozi, M. M. Nayebi, and G. Leus, “Sparse antenna and pulse placement for colocated mimo radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 579–593, 2019.
- G. H. Golub, “Comparison of the variance of minimum variance and weighted least squares regression coefficients,” Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 984–991, 1963.
- R. Sharma, “Some more inequalities for arithmetic mean, harmonic mean and variance,” J. Math. Inequalities, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2008.
- G. Bienvenu and L. Kopp, “Optimality of high resolution array processing using the eigensystem approach,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1235–1248, 1983.
- Y. Filmus and J. Ward, “A tight combinatorial algorithm for submodular maximization subject to a matroid constraint,” in IEEE Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci., 2012, pp. 659–668.