Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

New Feedback Control and Adaptive Evolve-Filter-Relax Regularization for the Navier-Stokes Equations in the Convection-Dominated Regime (2307.00675v1)

Published 2 Jul 2023 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: We propose, analyze, and investigate numerically a novel feedback control strategy for high Reynolds number flows. For both the continuous and the discrete (finite element) settings, we prove that the new strategy yields accurate results for high Reynolds numbers that were not covered by current results. We also show that the new feedback control yields more accurate results than the current control approaches in marginally-resolved numerical simulations of a two-dimensional flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds numbers $Re=1000$. We note, however, that for realistic control parameters, the stabilizing effect of the new feedback control strategy is not sufficient in the convection-dominated regime. Our second contribution is the development of an adaptive evolve-filter-relax (aEFR) regularization that stabilizes marginally-resolved simulations in the convection-dominated regime and increases the accuracy of the new feedback control in realistic parameter settings. For the finite element setting, we prove that the novel feedback control equipped with the new aEFR method yields accurate results for high Reynolds numbers. Furthermore, our numerical investigation shows that the new strategy yields accurate results for reduced order models that dramatically decrease the size of the feedback control problem.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (77)
  1. RBniCS – reduced order modelling in FEniCS, https://www.rbnicsproject.org/.
  2. An efficient DP algorithm on a tree-structure for finite horizon optimal control problems. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 41(4):2384–2406, 2019.
  3. A tree structure algorithm for optimal control problems with state constraints. Rendiconti di Matematica e delle Sue Applicazioni, 41:193–221, 2020.
  4. Error analysis for POD approximations of infinite horizon problems via the dynamic programming approach. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 55(5):3091–3115, 2017.
  5. A. Alla and M. Hinze. HJB-POD feedback control for Navier-Stokes equations. In G. Russo, V. Capasso, G. Nicosia, and V. Romano, editors, Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2014, pages 861–868, Cham, 2016. Springer International Publishing.
  6. A. Alla and L. Saluzzi. A HJB-POD approach for the control of nonlinear PDEs on a tree structure. Appl Numer Math., 155:192–207, 2020.
  7. Supremizer stabilization of POD–Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 102:1136–1161, 2015.
  8. Chapter 9 - space-time POD-Galerkin approach for parametric flow control. In E. Trèlat and E. Zuazua, editors, Numerical Control: Part A, volume 23 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, pages 307–338. Elsevier, 2022.
  9. Riccati-based boundary feedback stabilization of incompressible Navier–Stokes flows. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37(2):A832–A858, 2015.
  10. V. Barbu. Feedback stabilization of Navier-Stokes equations. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 9:197–205, 2003.
  11. V. Barbu and R. Triggiani. Internal stabilization of Navier-Stokes equations with finite-dimensional controllers. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 53(5):1443–1494, 2004.
  12. An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: Application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I, 339:667–672, 2004.
  13. Low-rank solution of an optimal control problem constrained by random Navier-Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 92(11):1653–1678, 2020.
  14. P. Benner and C. Trautwein. Optimal control problems constrained by the stochastic Navier–Stokes equations with multiplicative Lévy noise. Mathematische Nachrichten, 292(7):1444–1461, 2019.
  15. Deconvolution-based nonlinear filtering for incompressible flows at moderately large Reynolds numbers. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 81(8):463–488, 2016.
  16. POD and CVT-based reduced-order modeling of Navier–Stokes flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 196(1-3):337–355, 2006.
  17. Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation,’ and experiment. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 40(4-5):237–289, 2004. cited By 278.
  18. S. S. Collis and M. Heinkenschloss. Analysis of the streamline upwind/Petrov Galerkin method applied to the solution of optimal control problems. CAAM TR02-01, 108, 2002.
  19. K. Deckelnick and M. Hinze. Semidiscretization and error estimates for distributed control of the instationary Navier-Stokes equations. Numerische Mathematik, 97(2):297 – 320, 2004.
  20. L. Dedè. Reduced basis method and error estimation for parametrized optimal control problems with control constraints. Journal of Scientific Computing, 50(2):287–305, Feb 2012.
  21. Data-driven tensor train gradient cross approximation for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05109, 2022.
  22. Numerical analysis of filter-based stabilization for evolution equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50(5):2307–2335, 2012.
  23. Approximation of optimal control problems for the Navier-Stokes equation via multilinear HJB-POD. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 442:127722, 2023.
  24. P. F. Fischer and J. Mullen. Filter-based stabilization of spectral element methods. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 332(3):265–270, 2001.
  25. U. Frisch. Turbulence, The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
  26. Optimal control problems for the Navier-Stokes equations. In H.-J. Bungartz, R. H. W. Hoppe, and C. Zenger, editors, Lectures on Applied Mathematics, pages 143–155, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  27. A POD-Galerkin reduced order model for a LES filtering approach. J. Comput. Phys., 436:110260, 2021.
  28. Pressure stabilization strategies for a LES filtering reduced order model. Fluids, 6(9), 2021.
  29. A POD-galerkin reduced order model for the Navier–Stokes equations in stream function-vorticity formulation. Computers & Fluids, 244:105536, 2022.
  30. A hybrid projection/data-driven reduced order model for the Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear filtering stabilization. Journal of Computational Physics, 486:112127, 2023.
  31. On the stability of projection-based model order reduction for convection-dominated laminar and turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys., 419:109681, 2020.
  32. A Leray regularized ensemble-proper orthogonal decomposition method for parameterized convection-dominated flows. IMA J. Numer. Anal., 40(2):886–913, 2020.
  33. M. Gunzburger and S. Manservisi. Analysis and approximation for linear feedback control for tracking the velocity in Navier–Stokes flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 189(3):803–823, 2000.
  34. M. D. Gunzburger. Perspectives in flow control and optimization. SIAM, 2002.
  35. Analysis and finite element approximation of optimal control problems for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations with distributed and Neumann controls. Mathematics of Computation, 57(195):123–151, 1991.
  36. M. D. Gunzburger and S. Manservisi. Analysis and approximation of the velocity tracking problem for Navier-Stokes flows with distributed control. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 37(5):1481–1512, 2000.
  37. Balanced truncation model reduction for a class of descriptor systems with application to the Oseen equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(2):1038–1063, 2008.
  38. Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations. Springer, 2015.
  39. M. Hinze. Instantaneous closed loop control of the Navier–Stokes system. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 44(2):564–583, 2005.
  40. M. Hinze and K. Kunisch. Three control methods for time-dependent fluid flow. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 65(3-4):273–298, 2000.
  41. Towards model order reduction for fluid-thermal analysis. Nucl. Eng. Des., 370:110866, 2020.
  42. M. Kärcher and M. A. Grepl. A posteriori error estimation for reduced order solutions of parametrized parabolic optimal control problems. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 48(6):1615–1638, 2014.
  43. Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized elliptic optimal control problems with distributed controls. Journal of Scientific Computing, 75(1):276–307, 2018.
  44. K. Kunisch and S. Volkwein. Proper orthogonal decomposition for optimality systems. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 42(1):1–23, 2008.
  45. Numerical analysis and computational testing of a high accuracy Leray-deconvolution model of turbulence. Num. Meth. P.D.E.s, 24(2):555–582, 2008.
  46. W. J. Layton. Introduction to the numerical analysis of incompressible viscous flows, volume 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 2008.
  47. H.-C. Lee. Efficient computations for linear feedback control problems for target velocity matching of Navier-Stokes flows via POD and LSTM-ROM. Electronic Research Archive, 29(3):2533–2552, 2021.
  48. D. Leykekhman and M. Heinkenschloss. Local error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection-dominated elliptic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 50(4):2012–2038, 2012.
  49. Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012.
  50. An optimal control problem for the Navier-Stokes-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α system. J. Dyn. Control Syst., pages 1–28, 2021.
  51. Filtering techniques for complex geometry fluid flows. Commun. Numer. Meth. Engng., 15(1):9–18, 1999.
  52. Reduced basis approximation of parametrized optimal flow control problems for the Stokes equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 69(4):319–336, 2015.
  53. Reduced basis method for parametrized elliptic optimal control problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 35(5):A2316–A2340, 2013.
  54. Reduced-Order Modelling for Flow Control, volume 528. Springer Verlag, 2011.
  55. Residual-based stabilized reduced-order models of the transient convection-diffusion-reaction equation obtained through discrete and continuous projection. arXiv preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09355, 2023.
  56. Driving bifurcating parametrized nonlinear PDEs by optimal control strategies: Application to Navier-Stokes equations with model order reduction. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 56(4):1361 – 1400, 2022.
  57. S. Pope. Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  58. A. Quarteroni and S. Quarteroni. Numerical models for differential problems, volume 2. Springer, 2009.
  59. Reduced basis methods for optimal control of advection-diffusion problems. In Advances in Numerical Mathematics, number CMCS-CONF-2006-003, pages 193–216. RAS and University of Houston, 2007.
  60. A. Quarteroni and A. Valli. Numerical approximation of partial differential equations, volume 23. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
  61. J.-P. Raymond. Local boundary feedback stabilization of the Navier-Stokes equations. Control Systems: Theory, Numerics and Applications, Rome, 30, 2005.
  62. J.-P. Raymond. Feedback boundary stabilization of the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 45(3):790–828, 2006.
  63. J.-P. Raymond. Feedback boundary stabilization of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 87(6):627–669, 2007.
  64. G. Rozza and K. Veroy. On the stability of the reduced basis method for Stokes equations in parametrized domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 196(7):1244–1260, 2007.
  65. F. Sabetghadam and A. Jafarpour. α𝛼\alphaitalic_α regularization of the POD-Galerkin dynamical systems of the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation. Appl. Math. Comput., 218(10):6012–6026, 2012.
  66. M. Scha¨¨a\ddot{\mbox{a}}over¨ start_ARG a end_ARGfer and S. Turek. The benchmark problem ‘flow around a cylinder’ flow simulation with high performance computers II. in E.H. Hirschel (Ed.), Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 52, Braunschweig, Vieweg:547–566, 1996.
  67. A reduced order variational multiscale approach for turbulent flows. Adv. Comput. Math., pages 1–20, 2019.
  68. POD-Galerkin model order reduction for parametrized time dependent linear quadratic optimal control problems in saddle point formulation. Journal of Scientific Computing, 83(55), 2020.
  69. A Certified Reduced Basis method for linear parametrized parabolic optimal control problems in space-time formulation. Submitted, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00460.
  70. POD-Galerkin model order reduction for parametrized nonlinear time dependent optimal flow control: an application to Shallow Water Equations. Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 30(1):63–84, 2022.
  71. Consistency of the full and reduced order models for evolve-filter-relax regularization of convection-dominated, marginally-resolved flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 123(14):3148–3178, 2022.
  72. Reduced order methods for parametrized nonlinear and time dependent optimal flow control problems: towards applications in biomedical and environmental sciences. Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2019, 2021.
  73. R. Temam. Navier-Stokes equations: Theory and numerical analysis, volume 2. American Mathematical Society, 2001.
  74. An evolve-then-filter regularized reduced order model for convection-dominated flows. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 84:598––615, 2017.
  75. Numerical analysis of the Leray reduced order model. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 328:12–29, 2018.
  76. Stabilized weighted reduced order methods for parametrized advection-dominated optimal control problems governed by partial differential equations with random inputs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01975, 2023.
  77. A streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin reduced order method for advection-dominated partial differential equations under optimal control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01973, 2023.
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now