Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Personalized Household Assistive Robot that Learns and Creates New Breakfast Options through Human-Robot Interaction (2307.00114v1)

Published 30 Jun 2023 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.HC

Abstract: For robots to assist users with household tasks, they must first learn about the tasks from the users. Further, performing the same task every day, in the same way, can become boring for the robot's user(s), therefore, assistive robots must find creative ways to perform tasks in the household. In this paper, we present a cognitive architecture for a household assistive robot that can learn personalized breakfast options from its users and then use the learned knowledge to set up a table for breakfast. The architecture can also use the learned knowledge to create new breakfast options over a longer period of time. The proposed cognitive architecture combines state-of-the-art perceptual learning algorithms, computational implementation of cognitive models of memory encoding and learning, a task planner for picking and placing objects in the household, a graphical user interface (GUI) to interact with the user and a novel approach for creating new breakfast options using the learned knowledge. The architecture is integrated with the Fetch mobile manipulator robot and validated, as a proof-of-concept system evaluation in a large indoor environment with multiple kitchen objects. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our architecture to learn personalized breakfast options from the user and generate new breakfast options never learned by the robot.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. J. Iriondo and J. Jordan, “Older people projected to outnumber children for first time in U.S. history,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.perkinslawpc.com/images/Older˙People˙Projected˙to˙Outnumber˙Children˙for˙First˙Time˙in˙U.S.˙History.pdf
  2. J. Fuss, “Our aging population—a serious problem for canada,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/our-aging-population-a-serious-problem-for-canada
  3. M. J. Matarić, “Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation,” Science Robotics, vol. 2, no. 4, 2017.
  4. A. Ayub, C. L. Nehaniv, and K. Dautenhahn, “Don’t forget to buy milk: Contextually aware grocery reminder household robot,” in IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL).   IEEE, 2022, pp. 299–306.
  5. L. Petrecca, “How Robot Caregivers Will Help an Aging U.S. Population,” Oct. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.aarp.org/caregiving/home-care/info-2018/new-wave-of-caregiving-technology.html
  6. J. Shah, A. Ayub, C. L. Nehaniv, and K. Dautenhahn, “Where is my phone? towards developing an episodic memory model for companion robots to track users’ salient objects,” in Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2023, pp. 621–624.
  7. G. Kazhoyan, S. Stelter, F. K. Kenfack, S. Koralewski, and M. Beetz, “The robot household marathon experiment,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2021, pp. 9382–9388.
  8. S. Liu, G. Tian, Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, and S. Liu, “Service planning oriented efficient object search: A knowledge-based framework for home service robot,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 187, p. 115853, 2022.
  9. K. Dautenhahn, “Robots we like to live with?! - a developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion,” in 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2004, pp. 17–22.
  10. A. Augello, I. Infantino, A. Manfré, G. Pilato, and F. Vella, “Analyzing and discussing primary creative traits of a robotic artist,” Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, vol. 17, pp. 22–31, 2016.
  11. I. Infantino, A. Augello, A. Manfré, G. Pilato, and F. Vella, “Robodanza: Live performances of a creative dancing humanoid,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity, 2016, pp. 388–395.
  12. A. Manfré, A. Augello, G. Pilato, F. Vella, and I. Infantino, “Exploiting interactive genetic algorithms for creative humanoid dancing,” Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, vol. 17, pp. 12–21, 2016.
  13. J. L. Mcclelland, B. L. Mcnaughton, and R. C. Oreilly, “Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.” Psychological Review, vol. 102, no. 3, p. 419–457, 1995.
  14. M. Wise, M. Ferguson, D. King, E. Diehr, and D. Dymesich, “Fetch and freight: Standard platforms for service robot applications,” in IJCAI, Workshop on Autonomous Mobile Service Robots, 2016.
  15. D. McColl and G. Nejat, “A Socially Assistive Robot That Can Monitor Affect of the Elderly During Mealtime Assistance1,” Journal of Medical Devices, vol. 8, no. 3, 07 2014.
  16. ——, “Meal-time with a socially assistive robot and older adults at a long-term care facility,” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 152–171, 2013.
  17. Z. Wang, G. Tian, and X. Shao, “Home service robot task planning using semantic knowledge and probabilistic inference,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 204, p. 106174, 2020.
  18. P. Alves-Oliveira, S. Gomes, A. Chandak, P. Arriaga, G. Hoffman, and A. Paiva, “Software architecture for yolo, a creativity-stimulating robot,” SoftwareX, vol. 11, p. 100461, 2020.
  19. M. Elgarf, G. Skantze, and C. Peters, “Once upon a story: Can a creative storyteller robot stimulate creativity in children?” in Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 2021, pp. 60–67.
  20. C. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Shen, “Decorating your own bedroom: Locally controlling image generation with generative adversarial networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.08222, 2021.
  21. D. Mateja and A. Heinzl, “Towards machine learning as an enabler of computational creativity,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 460–475, 2021.
  22. A. Ayub and A. R. Wagner, “EEC: Learning to encode and regenerate images for continual learning,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  23. P. Robinette, A. Howard, and A. Wagner, “Effect of robot performance on human–robot trust in time-critical situations,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 425–436, 2017.
  24. A. Ayub and A. R. Wagner, “What am i allowed to do here?: Online learning of context-specific norms by pepper,” in International Conference on Social Robotics.   Springer, 2020, pp. 220–231.
  25. J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” in the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016.
  26. I. Douven and P. Gärdenfors, “What are natural concepts? A design perspective,” Mind & Language, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 313–334, 2020.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Ali Ayub (22 papers)
  2. Chrystopher L. Nehaniv (25 papers)
  3. Kerstin Dautenhahn (25 papers)
Citations (1)