Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Limits of Single Anchor Localization: Near-Field vs Far-Field (2307.00078v1)

Published 30 Jun 2023 in cs.IT, eess.SP, and math.IT

Abstract: It is well known that a single anchor can be used to determine the position and orientation of an agent communicating with it. However, it is not clear what information about the anchor or the agent is necessary to perform this localization, especially when the agent is in the near-field of the anchor. Hence, in this paper, to investigate the limits of localizing an agent with some uncertainty in the anchor location, we consider a wireless link consisting of source and destination nodes. More specifically, we present a Fisher information theoretical investigation of the possibility of estimating different combinations of the source and destination's position and orientation from the signal received at the destination. To present a comprehensive study, we perform this Fisher information theoretic investigation under both the near and far field propagation models. One of the key insights is that while the source or destination's $3$D orientation can be jointly estimated with the source or destination's $3$D position in the near-field propagation regime, only the source or destination's $2$D orientation can be jointly estimated with the source or destination's $2$D position in the far-field propagation regime. Also, a simulation of the FIM indicates that in the near-field, we can estimate the source's $3$D orientation angles with no beamforming, but in the far-field, we can not estimate the source's $2$D orientation angles when no beamforming is employed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. A. Shahmansoori, G. E. Garcia, G. Destino, G. Seco-Granados, and H. Wymeersch, “Position and orientation estimation through millimeter-wave MIMO in 5G systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1822–1835, Mar. 2018.
  2. Z. Abu-Shaban, X. Zhou, T. Abhayapala, G. Seco-Granados, and H. Wymeersch, “Error bounds for uplink and downlink 3D localization in 5G millimeter wave systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 4939–4954, Aug. 2018.
  3. R. Mendrzik, H. Wymeersch, G. Bauch, and Z. Abu-Shaban, “Harnessing NLOS components for position and orientation estimation in 5G millimeter wave MIMO,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93–107, Jan. 2019.
  4. D.-R. Emenonye, H. S. Dhillon, and R. M. Buehrer, “Fundamentals of RIS-aided localization in the far-field,” submitted to IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., available online: arxiv.org/abs/2206.01652, 2022.
  5. ——, “RIS-aided localization under position and orientation offsets in the near and far field,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., available online: arxiv.org/abs/2210.03599, 2022.
  6. A. Elzanaty, A. Guerra, F. Guidi, and M.-S. Alouini, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for localization: Position and orientation error bounds,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, vol. 69, pp. 5386–5402, Aug. 2021.
  7. M. Banagar and H. S. Dhillon, “Fundamentals of wobbling and hardware impairments-aware air-to-ground channel model,” submitted to IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., available online: arxiv.org/abs/2205.10957, 2022.
  8. M. Banagar, H. S. Dhillon, and A. F. Molisch, “Impact of UAV wobbling on the air-to-ground wireless channel,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 14 025–14 030, Nov. 2020.
  9. G. Naddafzadeh-Shirazi, M. B. Shenouda, and L. Lampe, “Second order cone programming for sensor network localization with anchor position uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 749–763, Feb. 2014.
  10. Y. Kim, B. Lee, H. So, and S.-C. Kim, “Localization technique considering position uncertainty of reference nodes in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1324–1332, Dec. 2018.
  11. M. Angjelichinoski, D. Denkovski, V. Atanasovski, and L. Gavrilovska, “SPEAR: Source position estimation for anchor position uncertainty reduction,” IEEE Commun. Letters, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 560–563, 2014.
  12. ——, “Cramér–rao lower bounds of rss-based localization with anchor position uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2807–2834, Mar. 2015.
  13. Y. Li, S. Ma, G. Yang, and K.-K. Wong, “Robust localization for mixed LOS/NLOS environments with anchor uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4507–4521, June 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.