Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Precision Anti-Cancer Drug Selection via Neural Ranking (2306.17771v1)

Published 30 Jun 2023 in cs.LG, cs.IR, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: Personalized cancer treatment requires a thorough understanding of complex interactions between drugs and cancer cell lines in varying genetic and molecular contexts. To address this, high-throughput screening has been used to generate large-scale drug response data, facilitating data-driven computational models. Such models can capture complex drug-cell line interactions across various contexts in a fully data-driven manner. However, accurately prioritizing the most sensitive drugs for each cell line still remains a significant challenge. To address this, we developed neural ranking approaches that leverage large-scale drug response data across multiple cell lines from diverse cancer types. Unlike existing approaches that primarily utilize regression and classification techniques for drug response prediction, we formulated the objective of drug selection and prioritization as a drug ranking problem. In this work, we proposed two neural listwise ranking methods that learn latent representations of drugs and cell lines, and then use those representations to score drugs in each cell line via a learnable scoring function. Specifically, we developed a neural listwise ranking method, List-One, on top of the existing method ListNet. Additionally, we proposed a novel listwise ranking method, List-All, that focuses on all the sensitive drugs instead of the top sensitive drug, unlike List-One. Our results demonstrate that List-All outperforms the best baseline with significant improvements of as much as 8.6% in hit@20 across 50% test cell lines. Furthermore, our analyses suggest that the learned latent spaces from our proposed methods demonstrate informative clustering structures and capture relevant underlying biological features. Moreover, our comprehensive empirical evaluation provides a thorough and objective comparison of the performance of different methods (including our proposed ones).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Epidemiology of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers. Seminars in Interventional Radiology 23, 1 (March 2006), 047–063.
  2. Deep learning for drug response prediction in cancer. Briefings in Bioinformatics 22, 1 (Jan. 2020), 360–379.
  3. Nature 483, 7391 (March 2012), 603–607.
  4. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs. Nature Chemistry 4, 2 (Jan. 2012), 90–98.
  5. Development of machine learning classifiers to predict compound activity on prostate cancer cell lines. Journal of Cheminformatics 14, 1 (Nov. 2022).
  6. Learning to Rank Using Gradient Descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (Bonn, Germany) (ICML ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–96.
  7. Learning to Rank: From Pairwise Approach to Listwise Approach (ICML ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129–136.
  8. Risk of second primary tumors in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study. Cancer 120, 17 (2014), 2735–2741.
  9. Adversarial deconfounding autoencoder for learning robust gene expression embeddings. Bioinformatics 36, Supplement 2 (Dec. 2020), i573–i582.
  10. Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning?. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 9). PMLR, 201–208.
  11. Risk of second primary malignancies among patients with prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study. PLOS ONE 12, 4 (04 2017), 1–11.
  12. An overview of machine learning methods for monotherapy drug response prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics 23, 1 (Oct. 2021).
  13. Drug ranking using machine learning systematically predicts the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs. Nature Communications 12, 1 (March 2021).
  14. Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 38, 2 (1998), 165–179.
  15. Identification of Selective Inhibitors of Cancer Stem Cells by High-Throughput Screening. Cell 138, 4 (2009), 645–659.
  16. Kernelized rank learning for personalized drug recommendation. Bioinformatics 34, 16 (03 2018), 2808–2816.
  17. Drug Selection via Joint Push and Learning to Rank. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinformatics 17, 1 (jan 2020), 110–123.
  18. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502, 7471 (Oct. 2013), 333–339.
  19. George Karypis. 2002. CLUTO - A Clustering Toolkit. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/215521
  20. The biology of Hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for genomic and immune therapies. Molecular Cancer 16, 1 (aug 2017).
  21. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 46, 1 (2001), 3–26.
  22. DeepCDR: a hybrid graph convolutional network for predicting cancer drug response. Bioinformatics 36 (12 2020), i911–i918.
  23. Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: Perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22, 8 (2003), 1666–1679.
  24. Matching anticancer compounds and tumor cell lines by neural networks with ranking loss. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 4, 1 (01 2022).
  25. Clinical landscape of cancer metastases. Cancer Medicine 7, 11 (Oct. 2018), 5534–5542.
  26. David Rogers and Mathew Hahn. 2010. Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 50, 5 (April 2010), 742–754.
  27. Harnessing Connectivity in a Large-Scale Small-Molecule Sensitivity Dataset. Cancer Discovery 5, 11 (11 2015), 1210–1223.
  28. Meta-GDBP: a high-level stacked regression model to improve anticancer drug response prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics 21, 3 (03 2019), 996–1005.
  29. Coupling of Prostate and Thyroid Cancer Diagnoses in the United States. Annals of Surgical Oncology 22, 3 (Sept. 2014), 1043–1049.
  30. Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization. BMC Cancer 17, 1 (Aug. 2017).
  31. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nature Genetics 45, 10 (Sept. 2013), 1113–1120.
  32. A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32, 1 (2021), 4–24.
  33. A deep auto-encoder model for gene expression prediction. BMC Genomics 18, S9 (Nov. 2017).
  34. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Research 41, D1 (11 2012), D955–D961.
  35. Graph neural network approaches for drug-target interactions. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 73 (2022), 102327.
  36. SWnet: a deep learning model for drug response prediction from cancer genomic signatures and compound chemical structures. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 1 (Sept. 2021).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.