Interdisciplinary Methods in Computational Creativity: How Human Variables Shape Human-Inspired AI Research (2306.17070v1)
Abstract: The word creativity originally described a concept from human psychology, but in the realm of computational creativity (CC), it has become much more. The question of what creativity means when it is part of a computational system might be considered core to CC. Pinning down the meaning of creativity, and concepts like it, becomes salient when researchers port concepts from human psychology to computation, a widespread practice extending beyond CC into AI. Yet, the human processes shaping human-inspired computational systems have been little investigated. In this paper, we question which human literatures (social sciences, psychology, neuroscience) enter AI scholarship and how they are translated at the port of entry. This study is based on 22 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, primarily with human-inspired AI researchers, half of whom focus on creativity as a major research area. This paper focuses on findings most relevant to CC. We suggest that which human literature enters AI bears greater scrutiny because ideas may become disconnected from context in their home discipline. Accordingly, we recommend that CC researchers document the decisions and context of their practices, particularly those practices formalizing human concepts for machines. Publishing reflexive commentary on human elements in CC and AI would provide a useful record and permit greater dialogue with other disciplines.
- 2017. Teaching computational creativity. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity (ICCC’17), 9–16.
- Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.
- Boden, M. A. 2004. The Creative Mind. London: Routledge.
- 2007. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.
- 2013. Interdisciplinary communication. J. Syst. Cybern. Inform. 11(9):23–31.
- 2022. Editor’s review and introduction: Cognition-inspired artificial intelligence. Top. Cogn. Sci. 14(4):652–664.
- Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Introducing Qualitative Methods. SAGE Publications.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow. New York: Harper & Row.
- 2022. Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop. PLOS ONE 17(4):1–16.
- Dasgupta, I. 2019. Algorithmic approaches to ecological rationality in humans and machines. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
- 2020. (In)citing action to realize an equitable future. Neuron 106(6):890–894.
- Fiske, A. P. 2020. The lexical fallacy in emotion research: Mistaking vernacular words for psychological entities. Psychol. Rev. 127(1):95–113.
- 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter.
- 2007. Grounded theory and racial/ethnic diversity. In Bryant, A., and Charmaz, K., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications. 472–492.
- Hodson, J. 2017. The Creative Machine. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity (ICCC’17), 143–150.
- Jasanoff, S. 2013. Fields and fallows: A political history of STS. In Interdisciplinarity. Routledge. 99–118.
- Jordanous, A. 2016. Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice. Connect. Sci. 28(2):194–216.
- Law, J. 2004. After Method. Routledge.
- 2016. From human to artificial cognition and back: New perspectives on cognitively inspired AI systems. Cogn. Syst. Res. 39:1–3.
- 2021. Data, Methods and Writing: Methodographies of STS Ethnographic Collaboration in Practice. Sci. Technol. Stud. 34(3):2–16. Number: 3.
- Liu, X. 2021. The use/less citations in feminist research. Aust. Fem. Stud. 36(108):212–221.
- MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2011. The levels of analysis revisited. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 366(1574):2076–2085.
- MacLeod, M. 2018. What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese 195(2):697–720.
- 2021. Natural and artificial intelligence: A brief introduction to the interplay between AI and neuroscience research. Neural Netw. 144:603–613.
- 1976. From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry. Tech. Rep. AIM-357, MIT.
- Marr, D. 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman and Company.
- 2014. Computational creativity: A philosophical approach, and an approach to philosophy. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity (ICCC’14), 254–262.
- Newell, A. 1970. Remarks on the relationship between artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology. In Banerji, R. B., and Mesarovic, M. D., eds., Theoretical Approaches to Non-Numerical Problem Solving, 363–400. Springer.
- 2011. Computational creativity theory: Inspirations behind the FACE and the IDEA models. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity (ICCC’11), 72–77.
- Poggio, T. 2012. The Levels of Understanding framework, revised. Perception 41(9):1017–1023.
- Putnam, H. 1975. Philosophy and our mental life. In Philosophical Papers, volume 2. Cambridge University Press. 291–303.
- 2020. Towards a Methodology for Field Work in Computational Creativity. New Gener. Comput. 38(4):713–737.
- 2020. Beyond the paradigm conflicts: A four-step coding instrument for grounded theory. Int. J. Qual. Methods 19.
- Rekdal, O. B. 2014. Academic citation practice: A sinking sheep? portal 14(4):567–585.
- 2007. Mind matters: The roots of reductionism. In Schouten, M., and Looren de Jong, H., eds., The Matter of the Mind. Blackwell. 1–28.
- 2014. Introduction. In Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. Routledge. 1–43.
- 1993. Artificial intelligence as craftwork. In Chaiklin, S., and Lave, J., eds., Understanding Practice. Cambridge University Press. 144–178.
- Tomasello, M. 2019. Becoming Human. Harvard University Press.
- Wiener, C. 2007. Making teams work in conducting grounded theory. In Bryant, A., and Charmaz, K., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications. 293–310.
- Wiggins, G. A. 2020. Creativity, information, and consciousness: The information dynamics of thinking. Phys. Life Rev. 34-35:1–39.
- Wiggins, G. A. 2021. Computational creativity and consciousness: Framing, fiction and fraud. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity (ICCC’21), 183–191.
- Nadia M. Ady (8 papers)
- Faun Rice (1 paper)