Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Building Trust Profiles in Conditionally Automated Driving (2306.16567v1)

Published 28 Jun 2023 in cs.HC and cs.RO

Abstract: Trust is crucial for ensuring the safety, security, and widespread adoption of automated vehicles (AVs), and if trust is lacking, drivers and the public may not be willing to use them. This research seeks to investigate trust profiles in order to create personalized experiences for drivers in AVs. This technique helps in better understanding drivers' dynamic trust from a persona's perspective. The study was conducted in a driving simulator where participants were requested to take over control from automated driving in three conditions that included a control condition, a false alarm condition, and a miss condition with eight takeover requests (TORs) in different scenarios. Drivers' dispositional trust, initial learned trust, dynamic trust, personality, and emotions were measured. We identified three trust profiles (i.e., believers, oscillators, and disbelievers) using a K-means clustering model. In order to validate this model, we built a multinomial logistic regression model based on SHAP explainer that selected the most important features to predict the trust profiles with an F1-score of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.89. We also discussed how different individual factors influenced trust profiles which helped us understand trust dynamics better from a persona's perspective. Our findings have important implications for designing a personalized in-vehicle trust monitoring and calibrating system to adjust drivers' trust levels in order to improve safety and experience in automated driving.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. J. Ayoub and F. Zhou, “Investigating drivers’ trust in autonomous vehicles’ decisions of lane changing events,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 1274–1278, 2020.
  2. J. Ayoub, L. Avetisyan, M. Makki, and F. Zhou, “An investigation of drivers’ dynamic situational trust in conditionally automated driving,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 501–511, 2021.
  3. R. Luo, N. Du, and X. J. Yang, “Evaluating effects of enhanced autonomy transparency on trust, dependence, and human-autonomy team performance over time,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 38, no. 18-20, pp. 1962–1971, 2022.
  4. H. Azevedo-Sa, H. Zhao, C. Esterwood, X. J. Yang, D. M. Tilbury, and L. P. Robert Jr, “How internal and external risks affect the relationships between trust and driver behavior in automated driving systems,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 123, p. 102973, 2021.
  5. N. Du, F. Zhou, D. Tilbury, L. P. Robert, and X. J. Yang, “Designing alert systems in takeover transitions: The effects of display information and modality,” in 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2021, pp. 173–180.
  6. L. Avetisyan, J. Ayoub, and F. Zhou, “Investigating explanations in conditional and highly automated driving: the effects of situation awareness and modality,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 89, pp. 456–466, 2022.
  7. Y. Chen, Y. Li, W. Yan, and X. Wang, “The effect of gender and cultural differences on trust in automated vehicles,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2663, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 2017.
  8. J. Ayoub, X. J. Yang, and F. Zhou, “Modeling dispositional and initial learned trust in automated vehicles with predictability and explainability,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 77, pp. 102–116, 2021.
  9. L. Avetisian, J. Ayoub, and F. Zhou, “Anticipated emotions associated with trust in autonomous vehicles,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 199–203, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661002
  10. R. Pak, A. C. McLaughlin, W. Leidheiser, and E. Rovira, “The effect of individual differences in working memory in older adults on performance with different degrees of automated technology,” Ergonomics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 518–532, 2017.
  11. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak, “Motorists’ preferences for different levels of vehicle automation: 2016,” University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation, 2016.
  12. K. A. Hoff and M. Bashir, “Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust,” Human factors, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 407–434, 2015.
  13. J. D. Lee and K. A. See, “Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance,” Human factors, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–80, 2004.
  14. X. Zhang, S. Ma, and Y. Li, “Effects of fear and anxiety on trust in autonomous vehicles: An empirical study,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 69, pp. 277–287, 2020.
  15. S. M. Merritt and D. R. Ilgen, “Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions,” Human factors, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 194–210, 2008.
  16. J. L. Szalma and G. S. Taylor, “Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.” Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 71, 2011.
  17. S. Bhat, J. B. Lyons, C. Shi, and X. J. Yang, “Clustering trust dynamics in a human-robot sequential decision-making task,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 8815–8822, 2022.
  18. J. Ayoub, Z. Wang, M. Li, H. Guo, R. Sherony, S. Bao, and F. Zhou, “Cause-and-effect analysis of adas: A comparison study between literature review and complaint data,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2022, pp. 139–149.
  19. J. Ayoub, N. Du, X. J. Yang, and F. Zhou, “Predicting driver takeover time in conditionally automated driving,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022.
  20. L. Robert, “Personality in the human robot interaction literature: A review and brief critique,” in Robert, LP (2018). Personality in the Human Robot Interaction Literature: A Review and Brief Critique, Proceedings of the 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Aug, 2018, pp. 16–18.
  21. S.-Y. Chien, K. Sycara, J.-S. Liu, and A. Kumru, “Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits,” in Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 60, no. 1.   SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2016, pp. 841–845.
  22. C. D. Myers and D. Tingley, “The influence of emotion on trust,” Political Analysis, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 492–500, 2016.
  23. N. Du, F. Zhou, E. M. Pulver, D. M. Tilbury, L. P. Robert, A. K. Pradhan, and X. J. Yang, “Examining the effects of emotional valence and arousal on takeover performance in conditionally automated driving,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 112, pp. 78–87, 2020.
  24. J. B. Engelmann, F. Meyer, C. C. Ruff, and E. Fehr, “The neural circuitry of affect-induced distortions of trust,” Science advances, vol. 5, no. 3, p. eaau3413, 2019.
  25. M. Desai, P. Kaniarasu, M. Medvedev, A. Steinfeld, and H. Yanco, “Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust,” in 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).   IEEE, 2013, pp. 251–258.
  26. J. Ayoub, L. Avetisian, X. J. Yang, and F. Zhou, “Real-time trust prediction in conditionally automated driving using physiological measures,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00607, 2022.
  27. V. L. Pop, A. Shrewsbury, and F. T. Durso, “Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation,” Human factors, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 545–556, 2015.
  28. M. Zuckerman, D. M. Kuhlman, J. Joireman, P. Teta, and M. Kraft, “A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five.” Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 65, no. 4, p. 757, 1993.
  29. S. M. Merritt, H. Heimbaugh, J. LaChapell, and D. Lee, “I trust it, but i don’t know why: Effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system,” Human factors, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 520–534, 2013.
  30. S. Hergeth, L. Lorenz, R. Vilimek, and J. F. Krems, “Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving,” Human factors, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 509–519, 2016.
  31. T. Jensen, M. M. H. Khan, Y. Albayram, M. A. A. Fahim, R. Buck, and E. Coman, “Anticipated emotions in initial trust evaluations of a drone system based on performance and process information,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 316–325, 2020.
  32. B. Rammstedt and O. P. John, “Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in english and german,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 203–212, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656606000195
  33. R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Academy of management review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, 1995.
  34. J. Lee and N. Moray, “Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems,” Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1243–1270, 1992.
  35. F. Zhou, Y. Ji, and R. J. Jiao, “Prospect-theoretic modeling of customer affective-cognitive decisions under uncertainty for user experience design,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 468–483, 2014.
  36. Y. Jiang, X. Li, and Y. Yang, “The effects of information on overtrust in highly automated driving,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 82, p. 102936, 2020.
  37. N. Moray, T. Inagaki, and M. Itoh, “Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks.” Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 44, 2000.
  38. D. B. Kaber, M. C. Wright, L. J. Prinzel III, and M. P. Clamann, “Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions,” Human factors, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 730–741, 2005.
  39. J. Manchon, M. Bueno, and J. Navarro, “From manual to automated driving: how does trust evolve?” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 528–554, 2021.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now