On the Functions Which are CCZ-equivalent but not EA-equivalent to Quadratic Functions over $\mathbb F_{p^n}$ (2306.13718v2)
Abstract: For a given function $F$ from $\mathbb F_{pn}$ to itself, determining whether there exists a function which is CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to $F$ is a very important and interesting problem. For example, K\"olsch \cite{KOL21} showed that there is no function which is CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to the inverse function. On the other hand, for the cases of Gold function $F(x)=x{2i+1}$ and $F(x)=x3+{\rm Tr}(x9)$ over $\mathbb F_{2n}$, Budaghyan, Carlet and Pott (respectively, Budaghyan, Carlet and Leander) \cite{BCP06, BCL09FFTA} found functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to $F$. In this paper, when a given function $F$ has a component function which has a linear structure, we present functions which are CCZ-equivalent to $F$, and if suitable conditions are satisfied, the constructed functions are shown to be EA-inequivalent to $F$. As a consequence, for every quadratic function $F$ on $\mathbb F_{2n}$ ($n\geq 4$) with nonlinearity $>0$ and differential uniformity $\leq 2{n-3}$, we explicitly construct functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to $F$. Also for every non-planar quadratic function on $\mathbb F_{pn}$ $(p>2, n\geq 4)$ with $|\mathcal W_F|\leq p{n-1}$ and differential uniformity $\leq p{n-3}$, we explicitly construct functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to $F$.