Are Ideal Measurements of Real Scalar Fields Causal? (2306.12980v1)
Abstract: Half a century ago a local and (seemingly) causally consistent implementation of the projection postulate was formulated for local projectors in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) by utilising the basic property that spacelike local observables commute. This was not the end of the story for whether projective, or ideal measurements in QFT respect causality. In particular, the causal consistency of ideal measurements was brought into question by Sorkin 20 years later using a scenario previously overlooked. Sorkin's example, however, involved a non-local operator, and thus the question remained whether ideal measurements of local operators are causally consistent, and hence whether they are physically realisable. Considering both continuum and discrete spacetimes such as causal sets, we focus on the basic local observables of real scalar field theory -- smeared field operators -- and show that the corresponding ideal measurements violate causality, and are thus impossible to realise in practice. We show this using a causality condition derived for a general class of update maps for smeared fields that includes unitary kicks, ideal measurements, and approximations to them such as weak measurements. We discuss the various assumptions that go into our result. Of note is an assumption that Sorkin's scenario can actually be constructed in the given spacetime setup. This assumption can be evaded in certain special cases in the continuum, and in a particularly natural way in Causal Set Theory. In such cases one can then freely use the projection postulate in a causally consistent manner. In light of the generic acausality of ideal measurements, we also present examples of local update maps that offer causality-respecting alternatives to the projection postulate as an operationalist description of measurement in QFT.
- States and observables in relativistic quantum field theories. Phys. Rev. D, 21:3316–3324, Jun 1980.
- Can we make sense out of the measurement process in relativistic quantum mechanics? Phys. Rev. D, 24:359–370, Jul 1981.
- A distinguished vacuum state for a quantum field in a curved spacetime: formalism, features, and cosmology. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(8), aug 2012.
- A ground state for the causal diamond in 2 dimensions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(10), oct 2012.
- Quantum information processing and relativistic quantum fields. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31(7):075007, mar 2014.
- Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus. Physical Review D, 103(2), jan 2021.
- Causal and localizable quantum operations. Physical Review A, 64(5), oct 2001.
- Impossible measurements revisited. Physical Review D, 104(2), jul 2021.
- Christian Bär. Green-hyperbolic operators on globally hyperbolic spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 333(3):1585–1615, jul 2014.
- Hilbert spaces from path integrals. J.Phys.A43:275302,2010, 43(27), jul 2010.
- Algebraic quantum field theory – an introduction. arXiv:1904.04051, 2019.
- Jonáš Fuksa. Limits on relativistic quantum measurement. arXiv:2109.03187, 2021.
- Measurement in quantum field theory. arXiv:2304.13356, 2023.
- James B. Hartle. Spacetime quantum mechanics and the quantum mechanics of spacetime. Gravitation and Quantizations: Proceedings of the 1992 Les Houches Summer School, arXiv:gr-qc/9304006, apr 1993.
- K. E. Hellwig and K. Kraus. Formal description of measurements in local quantum field theory. Phys. Rev. D, 1:566–571, Jan 1970.
- Quantum signaling in cavity QED. Physical Review A, 89(2), feb 2014.
- Steven Johnston. Particle propagators on discrete spacetime. Class. Quantum Grav. 25 202001, arXiv:0806.308, 2008.
- I. Jubb. Causal state updates in real scalar quantum field theory. Physical Review D, 105(2), jan 2022.
- Bernard S. Kay. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime. arXiv:gr-qc/0601008, 2007.
- Aleksandr Vladimirovcih Levichev. Prescribing the conformal geometry of a lorentz manifold by means of its causal structure. Soviet Math. Dokl. 35, 452–455., 1987.
- David Malament. The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime. Journal of Mathematical Physics 18(7), 1399–140, 1977.
- Eduardo Martín-Martínez. Causality issues of particle detector models in qft and quantum optics. Phys. Rev. D, 92:104019, Nov 2015.
- Broken covariance of particle detector models in relativistic quantum information. Phys. Rev. D, 103:025007, Jan 2021.
- E. Minguzzi and M. Sanchez. The causal hierarchy of spacetimes. arXiv:gr-qc/0609119, 2008.
- R. Penrose. Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1972.
- Sam Perlis. Theory of matrices. Addison-Wesley, 1958.
- A detector-based measurement theory for quantum field theory. Physical Review D, 105(6), mar 2022.
- Causality constraints on nonlocal quantum measurements. Physical Review A, 49(6):4331–4338, jun 1994.
- I: Functional Analysis. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. Elsevier Science, 1980.
- George Ellis Stephen Hawking. The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge University Press, 1973.
- Rafael D. Sorkin. Impossible measurements on quantum fields. In Directions in General Relativity: An International Symposium in Honor of the 60th Birthdays of Dieter Brill and Charles Misner, 2 1993.
- Rafael D. Sorkin. Scalar field theory on a causal set in histories form. J.Phys.Conf.Ser.306:012017,2011, jul 2011.
- Sumati Surya. The causal set approach to quantum gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 22(1), sep 2019.