2000 character limit reached
Stability analysis of admittance control using asymmetric stiffness matrix (2306.11983v1)
Published 21 Jun 2023 in cs.RO
Abstract: In contact-rich tasks, setting the stiffness of the control system is a critical factor in its performance. Although the setting range can be extended by making the stiffness matrix asymmetric, its stability has not been proven. This study focuses on the stability of compliance control in a robot arm that deals with an asymmetric stiffness matrix. It discusses the convergence stability of the admittance control. The paper explains how to derive an asymmetric stiffness matrix and how to incorporate it into the admittance model. The authors also present simulation and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed method.
- N. Hogan, “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part III— Applications,” J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, vol. 107, pp. 121–128, 1985.
- W. S. Newman: “Stability and performance limits of interaction controllers,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 563–570, 2012.
- T. Tang, H. Lin, Y. Zhao, W. Chen, and M. Tomizuka: “Autonomous alignment of peg and hole by force/torque measurement for robotic assembly,” in Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pp. 162–167, 2016.
- H. Unten, S. Sakaino and T. Tsuji: “Peg-in-Hole Using Transient Information of Force Response,” in IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1674–1682, 2023.
- S. Gubbi, S. Kolathaya, and B. Amrutur: “Imitation learning for high precision peg-in-hole tasks,” in Proc. of 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), pp. 368–372, 2020.
- J. Luo, E. Solowjow, C. Wen, J. A. Ojea, A. M. Agogino, A. Tamar, and P. Abbeel: “Reinforcement learning on variable impedance controller for high-precision robotic assembly,” in Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3080–3087, 2019.
- R. Ikeura and H. Inooka: “Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human,” in Proc. 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3097–3102 vol. 3, 1995.
- F. J. Abu-Dakka and M. Saveriano: “Variable impedance control and learning—a review.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 7, 590681, 2020.
- D. E. Whitney: “Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts,” Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of the Asme, vol. 104, pp. 65–77, 1982.
- F. Zhao and P. S. Y. Wu: “VRCC : a variable remote center compliance device,” Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 657–672, 1998.
- S. Lee: “Development of a new variable remote center compliance (VRCC) with modified elastomer shear pad (ESP) for robot assembly,” IEEE Trans. on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 193–197, 2005.
- F. Ferraguti, C. Secchi, and C. Fantuzzi: “A tank-based approach to impedance control with variable stiffness,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf on robotics and automation pp. 4948–4953, 2013
- F. Ferraguti, N. Preda, A. Manurung, M. Bonfe, O. Lambercy, R. Gassert, R. Muradore, P. Fiorini, and C. Secchi: “An energy tank-based interactive control architecture for autonomous and teleoperated robotic surgery,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1073–1088, 2015.
- K. Kronander and A. Billard: “Learning compliant manipulation through kinesthetic and tactile human-robot interaction,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 367–380, 2014.
- T. Sun, L. Peng, L. Cheng, Z. G. Hou and Y. Pan: “Stability-Guaranteed Variable Impedance Control of Robots Based on Approximate Dynamic Inversion,” in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 4193–4200, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2930582.
- E. Spyrakos-Papastavridis, P. R. N. Childs, and J. S. Dai: “Passivity Preservation for Variable Impedance Control of Compliant Robots,” in IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 2342–2353, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2961478.
- H. Kim, W. Yang: “Variable Admittance Control Based on Human–Robot Collaboration Observer Using Frequency Analysis for Sensitive and Safe Interaction,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 5, 1899, 2021.
- Y. Aydin, D. Sirintuna, C. Basdogan: “Towards collaborative drilling with a cobot using admittance controller,” Trans. Institute of Measurement and Control. vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1760–1773, 2021.
- C. Ott, A. Dietrich, and A. Albu-Schäffer: “Prioritized multi-task compliance control of redundant manipulators,” Automatica, vol. 53, pp. 416–423, 2015.
- M. Oikawa, T. Kusakabe, K. Kutsuzawa, S. Sakaino, and T. Tsuji: “Reinforcement learning for robotic assembly using non-diagonal stiffness matrix,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2737–2744, 2021.
- S. Kozlovsky, E. Newman, and M. Zacksenhouse, “Reinforcement Learning of Impedance Policies for Peg-in-Hole Tasks: Role of Asymmetric Matrices,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 10898–10905, 2022.
- K. Ohnishi, M. Shibata, and T. Murakami: “Motion control for advanced mechatronics,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 1996.
- S. W. Doebling, L. D. Peterson, and K. F. Alvin. “Experimental determination of local structural stiffness by disassembly of measured flexibility matrices.” J. Vib. Acoust., vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 949–957, 1998.
- E. Masehian and S. Ghandi: “Assembly sequence and path planning for monotone and nonmonotone assemblies with rigid and flexible parts,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 72, 2021, 102180.
- J. E. Colgate and N. Hogan: “Robust control of dynamically interacting systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 65–88, 1988