Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Application of Deep Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Oilfield Equipment (2306.11040v1)

Published 19 Jun 2023 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: This thesis explored applications of the new emerging techniques of artificial intelligence and deep learning (neural networks in particular) for predictive maintenance, diagnostics and prognostics. Many neural architectures such as fully-connected, convolutional and recurrent neural networks were developed and tested on public datasets such as NASA C-MAPSS, Case Western Reserve University Bearings and FEMTO Bearings datasets to diagnose equipment health state and/or predict the remaining useful life (RUL) before breakdown. Many data processing and feature extraction procedures were used in combination with deep learning techniques such as dimensionality reduction (Principal Component Analysis) and signal processing (Fourier and Wavelet analyses) in order to create more meaningful and robust features to use as an input for neural networks architectures. This thesis also explored the potential use of these techniques in predictive maintenance within oil rigs for monitoring oilfield critical equipment in order to reduce unpredicted downtime and maintenance costs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. K. Javed, R. Gouriveau, and N. Zerhouni, “State of the art and taxonomy of prognostics approaches, trends of prognostics applications and open issues towards maturity at different technology readiness levels,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 94, pp. 214–236, 09 2017.
  2. F. Mangili, Development of advanced computational methods for prognostics and health management in energy components and systems. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Mar. 2013.
  3. V. Dumoulin and F. Visin, “A guide to convolution arithmetic for deep learning,” ArXiv e-prints, mar 2016.
  4. A. Saxena, K. Goebel, D. Simon, and N. Eklund, “Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation,” in 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, IEEE, oct 2008.
  5. P. Nectoux, R. Gouriveau, K. Medjaher, E. Ramasso, B. Chebel-Morello, N. Zerhouni, and C. Varnier, “Pronostia: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests,” pp. 1–8, 06 2012.
  6. SKF, “Tapered roller thrust bearings.” Online.
  7. SKF, “Skf helps develop 1000-ton top drive and consolidate oem supply chain.” Online.
  8. K. Javed, R. Gouriveau, N. Zerhouni, and P. Nectoux, “A feature extraction procedure based on trigonometric functions and cumulative descriptors to enhance prognostics modeling,” pp. 1–7, 06 2013.
  9. ISO/IEC 2382:2015, “Information technology — vocabulary,” standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, 2015.
  10. IGI Global, 2013.
  11. J.-H. Shin and H.-B. Jun, “On condition based maintenance policy,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 119–127, apr 2015.
  12. T. Tinga and R. Loendersloot, “Aligning phm, shm and cbm by understanding the physical system failure behaviour,” in European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2014, 07 2014.
  13. E. R. Brown, N. N. McCollom, E.-E. Moore, and A. Hess, “Prognostics and health management a data-driven approach to supporting the f-35 lightning II,” in 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, 2007.
  14. K. L. Tsui, N. Chen, Q. Zhou, Y. Hai, and W. Wang, “Prognostics and health management: A review on data driven approaches,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1–17, 2015.
  15. A. K. Jardine, D. Lin, and D. Banjevic, “A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, pp. 1483–1510, oct 2006.
  16. M. I. M. Samuel Telford and I. Howard, “Condition based maintenance (cbm) in the oil and gas industry: An overview of methods and techniques,” in Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2011.
  17. L. Eriksen, “The impact of digital on unplanned downtime.” GE Digital, Oct. 2016.
  18. A. Hess, J. S. Stecki, and S. D. Rudov-Clark, “The maintenance aware design environment: Development of an aerospace phm software tool,” 2008.
  19. A. Cubillo, S. Perinpanayagam, and M. Esperon-Miguez, “A review of physics-based models in prognostics: Application to gears and bearings of rotating machinery,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, aug 2016.
  20. Y. Lei, N. Li, L. Guo, N. Li, T. Yan, and J. Lin, “Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 104, pp. 799–834, may 2018.
  21. X.-S. Si, W. Wang, C.-H. Hu, and D.-H. Zhou, “Remaining useful life estimation – a review on the statistical data driven approaches,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 213, pp. 1–14, aug 2011.
  22. R. Priemer, Introductory Signal Processing. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 1990.
  23. Elsevier - Health Sciences Division, 2016.
  24. Y. Chung, P. J. Haas, E. Upfal, and T. Kraska, “Unknown examples & machine learning model generalization,” CoRR, vol. abs/1808.08294, 2018.
  25. C. M. Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer, 2006. Christopher M. Bishop., Includes bibliographical references and index.
  26. A. Choromanska, M. Henaff, M. Mathieu, G. B. Arous, and Y. LeCun, “The loss surfaces of multilayer networks,”
  27. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” Nature, vol. 323, pp. 533–536, oct 1986.
  28. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 436–444, may 2015.
  29. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, pp. 1735–1780, nov 1997.
  30. L. Wen, X. Li, L. Gao, and Y. Zhang, “A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, pp. 5990–5998, jul 2018.
  31. J. Coble and J. Hines, “Identifying optimal prognostic parameters from data: A genetic algorithms approach,” Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 01 2009.
  32. K. Javed, R. Gouriveau, R. Zemouri, and N. Zerhouni, “Features selection procedure for prognostics: An approach based on predictability,” vol. 8, 08 2012.
  33. Schlumberger, “Top drive.” Online Oilfield Glossary.
  34. SKF, “Strength and reliability for the next generation of top drives.” Online.
  35. P. Pournazari, D. Adams, P. Ashok, E. van Oort, and K. Holliday, “Real-time health monitoring of top drives for offshore operations using physics based models and new sensor technology,” in SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.