Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Trained Transformers Learn Linear Models In-Context (2306.09927v3)

Published 16 Jun 2023 in stat.ML, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: Attention-based neural networks such as transformers have demonstrated a remarkable ability to exhibit in-context learning (ICL): Given a short prompt sequence of tokens from an unseen task, they can formulate relevant per-token and next-token predictions without any parameter updates. By embedding a sequence of labeled training data and unlabeled test data as a prompt, this allows for transformers to behave like supervised learning algorithms. Indeed, recent work has shown that when training transformer architectures over random instances of linear regression problems, these models' predictions mimic those of ordinary least squares. Towards understanding the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, we investigate the dynamics of ICL in transformers with a single linear self-attention layer trained by gradient flow on linear regression tasks. We show that despite non-convexity, gradient flow with a suitable random initialization finds a global minimum of the objective function. At this global minimum, when given a test prompt of labeled examples from a new prediction task, the transformer achieves prediction error competitive with the best linear predictor over the test prompt distribution. We additionally characterize the robustness of the trained transformer to a variety of distribution shifts and show that although a number of shifts are tolerated, shifts in the covariate distribution of the prompts are not. Motivated by this, we consider a generalized ICL setting where the covariate distributions can vary across prompts. We show that although gradient flow succeeds at finding a global minimum in this setting, the trained transformer is still brittle under mild covariate shifts. We complement this finding with experiments on large, nonlinear transformer architectures which we show are more robust under covariate shifts.

An Analysis of In-Context Learning Abilities in Transformers with Linear Self-Attention Layers

The paper "Trained Transformers Learn Linear Models In-Context" by Zhang, Frei, and Bartlett provides a detailed paper of the in-context learning (ICL) capabilities of transformer architectures equipped with linear self-attention (LSA) layers. Through this analysis, the authors seek to uncover the mechanisms by which transformers achieve ICL, particularly the ability to form predictions on new tasks by leveraging training examples without parameter updates.

The paper focuses on transformers trained for linear regression tasks. Training involves gradient flow optimization on a population loss over Gaussian-distributed linear models. The authors demonstrate that despite the inherent non-convexity of this setting, gradient flow with specific initial conditions converges to models that effectively mimic ordinary least squares predictions. A key finding is the robust performance against task and query distribution shifts, with ICL performance strongly reflecting the best linear predictor's error.

The main contributions outlined in the paper are:

  1. Convergence to Global Optima: The authors prove that for LSAs initialized appropriately, gradient flow converges globally. The trained transformer subsequently achieves prediction errors competitive with the best linear predictor under Gaussian marginals.
  2. Impact of Prompt Lengths on Learning and Predictive Performance: A detailed analysis reveals that learning efficacy depends heavily on both training (N) and testing (M) prompt lengths. While convergence improves as N increases, the prediction error behaves as O(1/M+1/N2)O(1/M + 1/N^2), indicating greater sensitivity to training prompt length.
  3. Interaction with Distribution Shifts: The paper examines the impact of various distribution shifts on ICL. Transformers exhibit resilience to task and query shifts, aligning model behavior with prior empirical findings. However, covariate shifts expose brittleness in model predictions, as performance metaphorically collapses when training and testing distributions diverge.
  4. Training with Diverse Covariate Distributions: To overcome limitations posed by fixed training covariate distributions, researchers explore models trained on random covariate distributions. While theoretical results imply limitations for LSAs, empirical evaluations of complex transformer variants (e.g., GPT2) indicate enhanced robustness but acknowledge notable gaps in matching traditional least squares' adaptability.

Empirical comparisons with more extensive transformer architectures, such as GPT2, underscore an essential observation: architectural complexity plays a significant role in accommodating covariate shifts, albeit with trade-offs, particularly when evaluated on untrained sequence lengths.

This research has several implications for future AI development. Primarily, it exposes areas where even highly sophisticated models may not align with ideal algorithms, such as ordinary least squares, in robustness. The findings stress the need to enhance models' in-context learning capabilities further, possibly through novel architectures or initialization schemes that afford greater robustness across diverse contextual scenarios.

In conclusion, this in-depth exploration of transformers' in-context learning abilities paves the way for new methodologies to enhance their capacity to handle diverse tasks robustly. These insights provide valuable frameworks for subsequent inquiries into ICL's theoretical underpinnings and potential enhancements for practical applications in artificial intelligence.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. “A Mechanism for Sample-Efficient In-Context Learning for Sparse Retrieval Tasks” In Preprint, arXiv:2305.17040, 2023
  2. “Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learning” In Preprint, arXiv:2306.00297, 2023
  3. Kabir Ahuja, Madhur Panwar and Navin Goyal “In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prism” In Preprint, arXiv:2306.04891, 2023
  4. “A Closer Look at In-Context Learning under Distribution Shifts” In Preprint, arXiv:2305.16704, 2023
  5. “What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15661, 2022
  6. “Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Models” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022
  7. Sanjeev Arora, Nadav Cohen and Elad Hazan “On the optimization of deep networks: Implicit acceleration by overparameterization” In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018, pp. 244–253
  8. “Implicit regularization in deep matrix factorization” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, 2019
  9. “On the implicit bias of initialization shape: Beyond infinitesimal mirror descent” In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021, pp. 468–477
  10. “Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selection” In Preprint, arXiv:2306.04637, 2023
  11. Mohamed Ali Belabbas “On implicit regularization: Morse functions and applications to matrix factorization” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04264, 2020
  12. Satwik Bhattamishra, Arkil Patel and Navin Goyal “On the computational power of transformers and its implications in sequence modeling” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.09286, 2020
  13. Yuejie Chi, Yue M Lu and Yuxin Chen “Nonconvex optimization meets low-rank matrix factorization: An overview” In IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 67.20 IEEE, 2019, pp. 5239–5269
  14. “Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Secretly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta Optimizers” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10559, 2022
  15. “Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context” In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2019
  16. “Universal Transformers”, 2019 arXiv:1807.03819 [cs.CL]
  17. “An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale” In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021
  18. Simon S Du, Wei Hu and Jason D Lee “Algorithmic regularization in learning deep homogeneous models: Layers are automatically balanced” In Advances in neural information processing systems 31, 2018
  19. “Inductive biases and variable creation in self-attention mechanisms” In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2022
  20. “What can transformers learn in-context? a case study of simple function classes” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01066, 2022
  21. “Implicit regularization in matrix factorization” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017
  22. “In-Context Learning of Large Language Models Explained as Kernel Regression”, 2023 arXiv:2305.12766 [cs.CL]
  23. Samy Jelassi, Michael Sander and Yuanzhi Li “Vision transformers provably learn spatial structure” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 2022, pp. 37822–37836
  24. “Understanding incremental learning of gradient descent: A fine-grained analysis of matrix sensing” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11500, 2023
  25. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014
  26. “The Closeness of In-Context Learning and Weight Shifting for Softmax Regression” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13276, 2023
  27. “Transformers as Algorithms: Generalization and Stability in In-context Learning” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07067, 2023
  28. Yuanzhi Li, Tengyu Ma and Hongyang Zhang “Algorithmic regularization in over-parameterized matrix sensing and neural networks with quadratic activations” In Conference On Learning Theory, 2018, pp. 2–47
  29. Yuchen Li, Yuanzhi Li and Andrej Risteski “How do transformers learn topic structure: Towards a mechanistic understanding” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04245, 2023
  30. Zhiyuan Li, Yuping Luo and Kaifeng Lyu “Towards resolving the implicit bias of gradient descent for matrix factorization: Greedy low-rank learning” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09839, 2020
  31. Valerii Likhosherstov, Krzysztof Choromanski and Adrian Weller “On the expressive power of self-attention matrices” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03764, 2021
  32. “Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automata” In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023
  33. “On a product of positive semidefinite matrices” In Linear algebra and its applications 295.1-3 Elsevier, 1999, pp. 3–6
  34. “An Isserlis’ theorem for mixed Gaussian variables: Application to the auto-bispectral density” In Journal of Statistical Physics 136 Springer, 2009, pp. 89–102
  35. “Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837, 2022
  36. OpenAI “GPT-4 Technical Report”, 2023 arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL]
  37. “Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07677, 2022
  38. Jorge Pérez, Javier Marinković and Pablo Barceló “On the turing completeness of modern neural network architectures” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03429, 2019
  39. Kaare Brandt Petersen and Michael Syskind Pedersen “The matrix cookbook” In Technical University of Denmark 7.15, 2008, pp. 510
  40. “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training” OpenAI, 2018
  41. “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners” In OpenAI blog 1.8, 2019, pp. 9
  42. Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Dominik Stöger and Changzhi Xie “Implicit Balancing and Regularization: Generalization and Convergence Guarantees for Overparameterized Asymmetric Matrix Sensing” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14244, 2023
  43. Asher Trockman and J Zico Kolter “Mimetic Initialization of Self-Attention Layers” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09828, 2023
  44. “Attention is all you need” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017
  45. Xinyi Wang, Wanrong Zhu and William Yang Wang “Large Language Models Are Implicitly Topic Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11916, 2023
  46. Gian-Carlo Wick “The evaluation of the collision matrix” In Physical review 80.2 APS, 1950, pp. 268
  47. “Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing” In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations, 2020, pp. 38–45
  48. “An explanation of in-context learning as implicit bayesian inference” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02080, 2021
  49. “Are transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10077, 2019
  50. “O (n) connections are expressive enough: Universal approximability of sparse transformers” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 2020, pp. 13783–13794
  51. “What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging, Parameterization, and Generalization” In Preprint, arXiv:2305.19420, 2023
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Ruiqi Zhang (58 papers)
  2. Spencer Frei (21 papers)
  3. Peter L. Bartlett (86 papers)
Citations (146)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com