Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Nash equilibria of the pay-as-bid auction with K-Lipschitz supply functions (2306.07663v1)

Published 13 Jun 2023 in eess.SY, cs.MA, cs.SI, cs.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: We model a system of n asymmetric firms selling a homogeneous good in a common market through a pay-as-bid auction. Every producer chooses as its strategy a supply function returning the quantity S(p) that it is willing to sell at a minimum unit price p. The market clears at the price at which the aggregate demand intersects the total supply and firms are paid the bid prices. We study a game theoretic model of competition among such firms and focus on its equilibria (Supply function equilibrium). The game we consider is a generalization of both models where firms can either set a fixed quantity (Cournot model) or set a fixed price (Bertrand model). Our main result is to prove existence and provide a characterization of (pure strategy) Nash equilibria in the space of K-Lipschitz supply functions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market. Operations research, 50(3), 477–489.
  2. Theory and Application of Linear Supply Function Equilibrium in Electricity Markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 25(2), 143–167.
  3. Capacity constrained supply function equilibrium models of electricity markets: Stability, nondecreasing constraints, and function space iterations.
  4. Pricing with markups in industries with increasing marginal costs. Mathematical Programming, 146(1), 143–184.
  5. David, A.K. (1993). Competitive bidding in electricity supply. In IEE proceedings C-Generation, transmission and distribution, volume 140, 421–426. IET.
  6. Debreu, G. (1952). A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 38(10), 886–893.
  7. Designing electricity auctions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(1), 23–46.
  8. Fan, K. (1952). Fixed-point and minimax theorems in locally convex topological linear spaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 38(2), 121.
  9. Genc, T.S. (2009). Discriminatory versus uniform-price electricity auctions with supply function equilibrium. Journal of optimization theory and applications, 140(1), 9–31.
  10. Glicksberg, I.L. (1952). A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem, with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 3(1), 170–174.
  11. Competition in the british electricity spot market. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929–53.
  12. The supply function equilibrium and its policy implications for wholesale electricity auctions. Utilities Policy, 18(4), 209–226.
  13. Holmberg, P. (2009). Supply function equilibria of pay-as-bid auctions. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 36, 154–177. 10.1007/s11149-009-9091-6.
  14. Kamgarpour, M. (2018). Game-theoretic models in energy systems and control. DTU Summer School, Modern Optimization in Energy Systems.
  15. Game theoretic analysis of electricity market auction mechanisms. In 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 6211–6216. IEEE.
  16. Designing coalition-proof reverse auctions over continuous goods. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 64(11), 4803–4810.
  17. Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica, 57(6), 1243–77.
  18. Microeconomic Theory. Number 9780195102680 in OUP Catalogue. Oxford University Press.
  19. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58(6), 1255–1277. URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2938316.
  20. A course in game theory. MIT press.
  21. On aggregative and mean field games with applications to electricity markets. In 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), 196–201. IEEE.
  22. Discriminatory price auctions in electricity markets: low volatility at the expense of high price levels. Journal of regulatory Economics, 23(2), 109–123.
  23. On the stability of wholesale electricity markets under real-time pricing. In 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 1911–1918. IEEE.
  24. Model and data analysis of two-settlement electricity market with virtual bidding. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 6645–6650. IEEE.
  25. Topkins, D.M. (1979). Equilibrium points in nonzero-sum n-person submodular games. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 17(6), 773–787. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/0317054.
  26. Topkins, D.M. (1998). Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press.
  27. Electricity market modeling trends. Energy policy, 33(7), 897–913.
  28. Vives, X. (1990). Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 19, 305–321. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(90)90005-T.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.