Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Diversity-seeking Jump Games in Networks (2305.17757v3)

Published 28 May 2023 in cs.GT

Abstract: Recently, strategic games inspired by Schelling's influential model of residential segregation have been studied in the TCS and AI literature. In these games, agents of k different types occupy the nodes of a network topology aiming to maximize their utility, which is a function of the fraction of same-type agents they are adjacent to in the network. As such, the agents exhibit similarity seeking strategic behavior. In this paper, we introduce a class of strategic jump games in which the agents are diversity-seeking: The utility of an agent is defined as the fraction of its neighbors that are of different type than itself. We show that in general it is computationally hard to determine the existence of an equilibrium in such games. However, when the network is a tree, diversity-seeking jump games always admit an equilibrium assignment. For regular graphs and spider graphs with a single empty node, we prove a stronger result: The game is potential, that is, the improving response dynamics always converge to an equilibrium from any initial placement of the agents. We also show (nearly tight) bounds on the price of anarchy and price of stability in terms of the social welfare (the total utility of the agents).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Swap stability in Schelling games on graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 1758–1765, 2020.
  2. Schelling games on graphs. Artificial Intelligence, 301:103576, 2021.
  3. Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological science, 15(8):507–510, 2004.
  4. A wealth and status-based model of residential segregation. Mathematical Sociology, 31(2):149–174, 2007.
  5. From Schelling to spatially explicit modeling of urban ethnic and economic residential dynamics. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(4):463–497, 2009.
  6. Topological influence and locality in swap Schelling games. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36(2):1–60, 2022.
  7. Schelling games with continuous types. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2520–2527, 2023.
  8. Tolerance is necessary for stability: Single-peaked swap Schelling games. In Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 81–87, 2022.
  9. An analysis of one-dimensional Schelling segregation. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of computing (STOC), pages 789–804, 2012.
  10. Elizabeth E Bruch. How population structure shapes neighborhood segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5):1221–1278, 2014.
  11. Welfare guarantees in Schelling segregation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71:143–174, 2021.
  12. Network creation with homophilic agents. In Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 151–157, 2022.
  13. Diversity preferences among employees and ethnoracial workplace segregation. Social science research, 74:62–76, 2018.
  14. Schelling models with localized social influence: a game-theoretic framework. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 240–248, 2020.
  15. Schelling segregation with strategic agents. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT), pages 137–149, 2018.
  16. The parameterized complexity of welfare guarantees in schelling segregation. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 2024.
  17. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? a panel data investigation. Strategic management journal, 33(9):1072–1089, 2012.
  18. Convergence and hardness of strategic Schelling segregation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE), pages 156–170, 2019.
  19. The impact of cultural diversity on innovation performance of MNC subsidiaries in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 98:204–213, 2019.
  20. Schelling games on graphs. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 266–272, 2019.
  21. Does diversity improve profits and shareholder returns? evidence from top rated companies for diversity by diversityinc. Advances in accounting, 37:94–102, 2017.
  22. Mark A Fossett. Simseg–a computer program to simulate the dynamics of residential segregation by social and ethnic status. Race and Ethnic Studies Institute Technical Report and Program, Texas A&M University, 1998.
  23. Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the united states. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1):S289–S318, 2015.
  24. Single-peaked jump schelling games. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT), pages 111–126, 2023.
  25. R. Garey Michael and David S. Johnson. Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. A Series of Books in the Mathematical Sciences, 1979.
  26. Exponential segregation in a two-dimensional Schelling model with tolerant individuals. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 984–993, 2017.
  27. Modified Schelling games. Theoretical Computer Science, 880:1–19, 2021.
  28. Not all strangers are the same: The impact of tolerance in Schelling games. Theoretical Computer Science, 971:114065, 2023.
  29. Equilibria in schelling games: Computational hardness and robustness. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 761–769, 2022.
  30. Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24(3):757–772, 2013.
  31. Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior, 14(1):124–143, 1996.
  32. Diversity-seeking jump games in networks. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT), pages 198–217, 2023.
  33. Schelling’s spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1-2):1–24, 2007.
  34. The impact of diversity courses on college students’ moral development. Journal of College Student Development, 57(4):395–410, 2016.
  35. Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group processes & intergroup relations, 9(4):467–482, 2006.
  36. A unified framework for Schelling’s model of segregation. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(07):P07006, 2011.
  37. Thomas C. Schelling. Models of segregation. The American economic review, 59(2):488–493, 1969.
  38. Thomas C. Schelling. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology, 1(2):143–186, 1971.
  39. General social surveys, 1972-2018: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: NORC, 2019.
  40. Samuel R Sommers. On racial diversity and group decision making: identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(4):597, 2006.
  41. Diversity and community can coexist. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57(1-2):243–254, 2016.
  42. Junfu Zhang. A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3):147–170, 2004.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Lata Narayanan (21 papers)
  2. Yasaman Sabbagh (1 paper)
  3. Alexandros A. Voudouris (53 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com