Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning When to Ask for Help: Efficient Interactive Navigation via Implicit Uncertainty Estimation (2305.16502v3)

Published 25 May 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Robots operating alongside humans often encounter unfamiliar environments that make autonomous task completion challenging. Though improving models and increasing dataset size can enhance a robot's performance in unseen environments, data collection and model refinement may be impractical in every environment. Approaches that utilize human demonstrations through manual operation can aid in refinement and generalization, but often require significant data collection efforts to generate enough demonstration data to achieve satisfactory task performance. Interactive approaches allow for humans to provide correction to robot action in real time, but intervention policies are often based on explicit factors related to state and task understanding that may be difficult to generalize. Addressing these challenges, we train a lightweight interaction policy that allows robots to decide when to proceed autonomously or request expert assistance at estimated times of uncertainty. An implicit estimate of uncertainty is learned via evaluating the feature extraction capabilities of the robot's visual navigation policy. By incorporating part-time human interaction, robots recover quickly from their mistakes, significantly improving the odds of task completion. Incorporating part-time interaction yields an increase in success of 0.38 with only a 0.3 expert interaction rate within the Habitat simulation environment using a simulated human expert. We further show success transferring this approach to a new domain with a real human expert, improving success from less than 0.1 with an autonomous agent to 0.92 with a 0.23 human interaction rate. This approach provides a practical means for robots to interact and learn from humans in real-world settings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. P. Anderson, Q. Wu, D. Teney, J. Bruce, M. Johnson, N. Sünderhauf, I. Reid, S. Gould, and A. Van Den Hengel, “Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 3674–3683.
  2. E. Wijmans, A. Kadian, A. Morcos, S. Lee, I. Essa, D. Parikh, M. Savva, and D. Batra, “Dd-ppo: Learning near-perfect pointgoal navigators from 2.5 billion frames,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00357, 2019.
  3. S. Levine, A. Kumar, G. Tucker, and J. Fu, “Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643, 2020.
  4. S. S. Saha, S. S. Sandha, and M. Srivastava, “Machine learning for microcontroller-class hardware-a review,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022.
  5. T. Xie, N. Jiang, H. Wang, C. Xiong, and Y. Bai, “Policy finetuning: Bridging sample-efficient offline and online reinforcement learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 27 395–27 407, 2021.
  6. B. D. Argall, S. Chernova, M. Veloso, and B. Browning, “A survey of robot learning from demonstration,” Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 469–483, 2009.
  7. A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L.-C. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Pang, V. Vasudevan et al., “Searching for mobilenetv3,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 1314–1324.
  8. F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, “Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and¡ 0.5 mb model size,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360, 2016.
  9. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  10. D. Wofk, F. Ma, T.-J. Yang, S. Karaman, and V. Sze, “Fastdepth: Fast monocular depth estimation on embedded systems,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 6101–6108.
  11. “Models and pre-trained weights,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://pytorch.org/vision/stable/models.html
  12. F. Torabi, G. Warnell, and P. Stone, “Behavioral cloning from observation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01954, 2018.
  13. A. Hussein, M. M. Gaber, E. Elyan, and C. Jayne, “Imitation learning: A survey of learning methods,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1–35, 2017.
  14. G. Konidaris, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Perez, “From skills to symbols: Learning symbolic representations for abstract high-level planning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 61, pp. 215–289, 2018.
  15. M. Garnelo, K. Arulkumaran, and M. Shanahan, “Towards deep symbolic reinforcement learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05518, 2016.
  16. Y. Wang, L. R. Humphrey, Z. Liao, and H. Zheng, “Trust-based multi-robot symbolic motion planning with a human-in-the-loop,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–33, 2018.
  17. R. Papallas and M. R. Dogar, “To ask for help or not to ask: A predictive approach to human-in-the-loop motion planning for robot manipulation tasks,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2022, pp. 649–656.
  18. M. Savva, A. Kadian, O. Maksymets, Y. Zhao, E. Wijmans, B. Jain, J. Straub, J. Liu, V. Koltun, J. Malik et al., “Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 9339–9347.
  19. Abhishek Kadian*, Joanne Truong*, A. Gokaslan, A. Clegg, E. Wijmans, S. Lee, M. Savva, S. Chernova, and D. Batra, “Are We Making Real Progress in Simulated Environments? Measuring the Sim2Real Gap in Embodied Visual Navigation,” in arXiv:1912.06321, 2019.
  20. A. Chang, A. Dai, T. Funkhouser, M. Halber, M. Niessner, M. Savva, S. Song, A. Zeng, and Y. Zhang, “Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D data in indoor environments,” International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), 2017.
  21. J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, “Proximal policy optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.
  22. P. Anderson, A. Chang, D. S. Chaplot, A. Dosovitskiy, S. Gupta, V. Koltun, J. Kosecka, J. Malik, R. Mottaghi, M. Savva et al., “On evaluation of embodied navigation agents,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757, 2018.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Ifueko Igbinedion (1 paper)
  2. Sertac Karaman (77 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

Efficient Interactive Navigation via Implicit Uncertainty Estimation

The paper "Learning When to Ask for Help: Efficient Interactive Navigation via Implicit Uncertainty Estimation" explores a novel approach to enhancing robotic navigation in diverse and unfamiliar environments by integrating human interaction into the decision-making process. The authors aim to address the persistent challenge faced by autonomous robots in executing tasks within environments that differ significantly from the conditions they were trained under. While improvements in models and data aggregation can somewhat mitigate these issues, they are often impractical in dynamic and novel settings where robots operate alongside humans.

Main Contributions

The authors propose a light-weight, interactive policy that empowers a navigation robot to assess its own uncertainty implicitly and autonomously seek human assistance when needed. This approach contrasts with existing methods that rely heavily on explicit state or task understanding, which can be challenging to generalize across different environments.

The core mechanism introduced is a secondary policy that decides between autonomous continuation and soliciting human guidance based on an implicitly learned uncertainty model. This model is derived from the feature extraction capabilities of a pre-trained visual navigation policy, thus leveraging the existing computational framework without significant overhead.

Experimental Validation

The research validates the proposed method in both synthetic and real-world environments. It utilizes the Habitat simulation environment with a simulated expert to quantify improvements, demonstrating a substantial 0.38 increase in success rate with only a 0.3 interaction rate. The success is further echoed in a real domain, achieving a success rate climb from less than 0.1 in fully autonomous operation to 0.92 with a modest 0.23 interaction rate, highlighting the applicability and effectiveness of the human-augmented strategy.

Implications and Future Directions

This work holds significant implications in several dimensions of AI and robotic applications. Practically, it offers a robust framework for deploying robots in real-world environments without the exhaustive need for environment-specific data fine-tuning. This capability is critical for scenarios like search and rescue, where the environment cannot be fully known or simulated in advance.

Theoretically, the introduction of uncertainty-awareness as a trigger for human-robot interaction contributes to a deeper understanding of how autonomous systems can dynamically integrate human expertise in a feedback loop. This could spur further research into other domains of rational human-robot collaboration, potentially extending to multi-agent systems and more complex decision-making processes.

Looking forward, leveraging natural language interfaces as a medium for interaction and refining human-robot communication through few-shot learning approaches could extend the versatility of this strategy. Additionally, integrating this approach with more sophisticated strategies to pre-train and fine-tune navigation policies will likely enhance the robustness of robots against domain shifts, promoting a seamless transition from simulated to real-world environments.

In summary, the paper lays a significant foundation for the development of more adaptable and human-assistive robotic systems, facilitating growing synergies between AI and human capabilities in tangible, real-world tasks.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com