Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Graph Neural Network-based surrogate model for granular flows (2305.05218v2)

Published 9 May 2023 in physics.geo-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: Accurate simulation of granular flow dynamics is crucial for assessing various geotechnical risks, including landslides and debris flows. Granular flows involve a dynamic rearrangement of particles exhibiting complex transitions from solid-like to fluid-like responses. Traditional continuum and discrete numerical methods are limited by their computational cost in simulating large-scale systems. Statistical or machine learning-based models offer an alternative. Still, they are largely empirical, based on a limited set of parameters. Due to their permutation-dependent learning, traditional machine learning-based models require huge training data to generalize. To resolve these problems, we use a graph neural network, a state-of-the-art machine learning architecture that learns local interactions. Graphs represent the state of dynamically changing granular flows and the interaction laws, such as energy and momentum exchange between grains. We develop a graph neural network-based simulator (GNS) that takes the current state of granular flow and predicts the next state using Euler explicit integration by learning the local interaction laws. We train GNS on different granular trajectories. We then assess the performance of GNS by predicting granular column collapse. GNS accurately predicts flow dynamics for column collapses with different aspect ratios unseen during training. GNS is hundreds of times faster than high-fidelity numerical simulators. The model also generalizes to domains much larger than the training data, handling more than twice the number of particles than it was trained on.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Tsunami-driven debris effects on structures using a multi-gpu mpm tool. Mecánica Computacional 38, 3–3.
  2. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. CoRR abs/1806.01261.
  3. Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics. CoRR abs/1612.00222.
  4. Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 52, 182–197.
  5. Flume investigation of landslide debris–resisting baffles. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 51, 540–553.
  6. Training, validation, testing data, and trained model. URL: https://www.designsafe-ci.org/data/browser/public/designsafe.storage.published/PRJ-4275/#details-5385005666722770450-242ac117-0001-012, doi:10.17603/DS2-4NQZ-S548.
  7. An exploration of the use of machine learning to predict lateral spreading. Earthquake Spectra 37, 2288–2314. doi:10.1177/87552930211004613.
  8. Topography and geology effects on travel distances of natural terrain landslides: Evidence from a large multi-temporal landslide inventory in hong kong. Engineering Geology 292. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106266.
  9. Three-dimensionsal granular flow continuum modeling via material point method with hyperelastic nonlocal granular fluidity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 394, 114904. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.114904.
  10. Taichi: a language for high-performance computation on spatially sparse data structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 201.
  11. Predicting landslide runout paths using terrain matching-targeted machine learning. Engineering Geology 311. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106902.
  12. Simulation of collapse of granular columns using the discrete element method. International Journal of Geomechanics 15, 04015004. doi:10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000467.
  13. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980.
  14. Multi-scale multiphase modelling of granular flows. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge. doi:10.5281/zenodo.160339. phD Thesis.
  15. Granular column collapse with graph neural network-based simulator. doi:10.17603/DS2-GVVW-GT60.
  16. Mechanics of granular column collapse in fluid at varying slope angles. Journal of Hydrodynamics 29, 529–541. doi:10.1016/s1001-6058(16)60766-7.
  17. Scalable and modular material point method for large-scale simulations. arXiv:1909.13380.
  18. Modelling transient dynamics of granular slopes: Mpm and dem. Procedia Engineering 175, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.032.
  19. Gns: A generalizable graph neural network-based simulator for particulate and fluid modeling. arXiv:2211.10228.
  20. Spreading of a granular mass on a horizontal plane. Physics of Fluids 16, 2371–2381. doi:10.1063/1.1736611.
  21. Collapses of two-dimensional granular columns. Physical Review E 72. doi:10.1103/physreve.72.041301.
  22. Simulating granular column collapse using the material point method. Acta Geotechnica 10, 101–116. doi:10.1007/s11440-014-0309-0.
  23. Effects of material properties on the mobility of granular flow. Granular Matter 22. doi:10.1007/s10035-020-01024-y.
  24. Constraint-based graph network simulator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09161 .
  25. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. CoRR abs/2002.09405. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09405, arXiv:2002.09405.
  26. Differentiable physics-informed graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.02950 .
  27. Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method. Géotechnique 66, 248–273. doi:10.1680/jgeot.15.LM.005.
  28. Study of the collapse of granular columns using two-dimensional discrete-grain simulation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 545, 1–27. doi:10.1017/S0022112005006415.
  29. From probabilistic back analyses to probabilistic run-out predictions of landslides: A case study of heifangtai terrace, gansu province, china. Engineering Geology 280, 105950. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105950.
  30. 3d dem investigation of granular column collapse: Evaluation of debris motion and its destructive power. Engineering Geology 186, 3–16. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.018.
  31. Learning to simulate unseen physical systems with graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11976 .
  32. Data-Driven Modeling of Granular Column Collapse. pp. 79–88. doi:10.1061/9780784483701.008.
  33. Numerical simulation of fast granular flow facing obstacles on steep terrains. Journal of Fluids and Structures 99, 103162.
  34. 3d probabilistic landslide run-out hazard evaluation for quantitative risk assessment purposes. Engineering Geology 293, 106303. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106303.
  35. An efficient bayesian method for estimating runout distance of region-specific landslides using sparse data. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 16, 140–153. doi:10.1080/17499518.2021.1952613.
Citations (15)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.