Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs

Published 4 May 2023 in cs.CL | (2305.03111v3)

Abstract: Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.

Citations (244)

Summary

  • The paper presents Bird, a benchmark that generates SQL from natural language queries using large-scale databases.
  • It introduces innovative evaluation metrics like Execution Accuracy and Valid Efficiency Score to assess both correctness and efficiency.
  • The study highlights challenges with noisy data values and external knowledge integration, guiding future text-to-SQL research.

Can LLM Already Serve as a Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs

This paper presents Bird, a large-scale benchmark designed to address the gap between academic studies and real-world applications in text-to-SQL tasks. Bird focuses on generating SQL queries from natural language questions grounded with large-scale databases. It aims to improve the understanding and efficiency of text-to-SQL models concerning vast and noisy data values, external knowledge grounding, and SQL efficiency.

Introduction

Text-to-SQL is the process of transforming natural language questions into SQL queries, enabling users to retrieve relevant data from databases effortlessly. Despite notable progress with models such as GPT-4, the prevalent benchmarks do not sufficiently account for the challenges posed by large-scale database values. Bird addresses this by encompassing vast databases, complex database types, external reasoning requirements, and efficiency considerations. The benchmark includes 12,751 text-to-SQL pairs over 95 databases, covering diverse professional domains. Figure 1

Figure 1: Examples of challenges in our Bird benchmark, illustrating noisy data types, external knowledge requirements, and efficiency considerations.

Benchmark Characteristics

Bird introduces several novel attributes that differentiate it from existing benchmarks. One of the key features is the emphasis on database values rather than purely focusing on schema. This highlights new challenges such as handling noisy data types and integration of external knowledge for efficient SQL generation. Figure 2

Figure 2: An Overview of the Bird Annotation Workflow displaying database assembly, teaching crowdsourcing participants, question corpus creation, and SQL annotation.

Evaluation Metrics

The paper introduces two evaluation metrics: Execution Accuracy (EX) and Valid Efficiency Score (VES). Execution Accuracy measures the correctness of SQL results, while VES evaluates the efficiency of SQL execution, incorporating not just correctness but also the speed of query performance.

Experimental Analysis

Bird provides an extensive evaluation of both FT-based and ICL-based models, with GPT-4 achieving top performance but still lagging behind the human baseline. This demonstrates the complex nature of Bird and the need for robust text-to-SQL models which can efficiently handle large-scale database values. Figure 3

Figure 3: A bar chart provides a visual comparison of advanced model performances on BIRD.

SQL Efficiency and Knowledge Grounding

The paper analyzes strategies to improve SQL efficiency, emphasizing two-stage optimization and opportunities to leverage "chat with database" capabilities to fine-tune SQL generation. Additionally, it quantifies the impact of external knowledge sentences, demonstrating significant performance gains with their integration. Figure 4

Figure 4: Solutions to improve SQL efficiency, including SQL rewriting and adding indexes.

Implications and Future Directions

Bird facilitates a connection between academic research and industry applications, encouraging the development of models capable of accurately and efficiently generating SQL from complex natural language instructions in realistic datasets. Future endeavors could explore new methodologies for knowledge grounding and further optimize models for real-world performance.

Conclusion

Bird offers a comprehensive challenge to the text-to-SQL community by focusing on large database values, external knowledge grounding, and SQL efficiency. The benchmark highlights the existing gaps in current models and aims to drive further research into creating more robust, efficient, and context-aware text-to-SQL solutions.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

GitHub

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.