Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Fine-Grained Complexity of Small-Size Geometric Set Cover and Discrete $k$-Center for Small $k$ (2305.01892v1)

Published 3 May 2023 in cs.CG and cs.DS

Abstract: We study the time complexity of the discrete $k$-center problem and related (exact) geometric set cover problems when $k$ or the size of the cover is small. We obtain a plethora of new results: - We give the first subquadratic algorithm for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 2D, running in $\widetilde{O}(n{3/2})$ time. - We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n{4/3-\delta})$ for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 4D, for any constant $\delta>0$, under a standard hypothesis about triangle detection in sparse graphs. - Given $n$ points and $n$ weighted axis-aligned unit squares in 2D, we give the first subquadratic algorithm for finding a minimum-weight cover of the points by 3 unit squares, running in $\widetilde{O}(n{8/5})$ time. We also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n{3/2-\delta})$ for the same problem in 2D, under the well-known APSP Hypothesis. For arbitrary axis-aligned rectangles in 2D, our upper bound is $\widetilde{O}(n{7/4})$. - We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n{2-\delta})$ for Euclidean discrete 2-center in 13D, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound nearly matches the straightforward upper bound of $\widetilde{O}(n\omega)$, if the matrix multiplication exponent $\omega$ is equal to 2. - We similarly prove an $\Omega(n{k-\delta})$ lower bound for Euclidean discrete $k$-center in $O(k)$ dimensions for any constant $k\ge 3$, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound again nearly matches known upper bounds if $\omega=2$. - We also prove an $\Omega(n{2-\delta})$ lower bound for the problem of finding 2 boxes to cover the largest number of points, given $n$ points and $n$ boxes in 12D. This matches the straightforward near-quadratic upper bound.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.