Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Long-term Forecasting with TiDE: Time-series Dense Encoder (2304.08424v5)

Published 17 Apr 2023 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: Recent work has shown that simple linear models can outperform several Transformer based approaches in long term time-series forecasting. Motivated by this, we propose a Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) based encoder-decoder model, Time-series Dense Encoder (TiDE), for long-term time-series forecasting that enjoys the simplicity and speed of linear models while also being able to handle covariates and non-linear dependencies. Theoretically, we prove that the simplest linear analogue of our model can achieve near optimal error rate for linear dynamical systems (LDS) under some assumptions. Empirically, we show that our method can match or outperform prior approaches on popular long-term time-series forecasting benchmarks while being 5-10x faster than the best Transformer based model.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Martín Abadi. Tensorflow: learning functions at scale. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pages 1–1, 2016.
  2. Gluonts: Probabilistic and neural time series modeling in python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):4629–4634, 2020.
  3. On the benefits of maximum likelihood estimation for regression and forecasting. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  4. Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov):463–482, 2002.
  5. Some recent advances in forecasting and control. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 17(2):91–109, 1968.
  6. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  7. NHITS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series forecasting. In The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference 2023 (AAAI 2023), 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12886.
  8. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344–16359, 2022.
  9. Tilmann Gneiting. Making and evaluating point forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494):746–762, 2011.
  10. Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  11. Diagonal state spaces are as effective as structured state spaces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:22982–22994, 2022.
  12. Learning linear dynamical systems via spectral filtering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
  13. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
  14. Rnns incrementally evolving on an equilibrium manifold: A panacea for vanishing and exploding gradients? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  15. Rudolf Emil Kalman. Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Series A: Control, 1(2):152–192, 1963.
  16. Reversible instance normalization for accurate time-series forecasting against distribution shift. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  17. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  18. The surprising efficiency of framing geo-spatial time series forecasting as a video prediction task–insights from the iarai traffic4cast competition at neurips 2019. In NeurIPS 2019 Competition and Demonstration Track, pages 232–241. PMLR, 2020.
  19. Enhancing the locality and breaking the memory bottleneck of transformer on time series forecasting. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019a.
  20. Deep independently recurrent neural network (indrnn). arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06251, 2019b.
  21. Pyraformer: Low-complexity pyramidal attention for long-range time series modeling and forecasting. In International conference on learning representations, 2021.
  22. Time-adaptive recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05192, 2022.
  23. The m5 accuracy competition: Results, findings and conclusions. Int J Forecast, 2020.
  24. M5 accuracy competition: Results, findings, and conclusions. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(4):1346–1364, 2022.
  25. ED McKenzie. General exponential smoothing and the equivalent arma process. Journal of Forecasting, 3(3):333–344, 1984.
  26. A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers. International conference on learning representations, 2022.
  27. N-beats: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  28. Coupled oscillatory recurrent neural network (cornn): An accurate and (gradient) stable architecture for learning long time dependencies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00951, 2020.
  29. Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3):1181–1191, 2020.
  30. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  31. Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04768, 2020.
  32. Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:22419–22430, 2021.
  33. Are transformers effective for time series forecasting? Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2023.
  34. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2021.
  35. Fedformer: Frequency enhanced decomposed transformer for long-term series forecasting. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 27268–27286. PMLR, 2022.
  36. Vector autoregressive models for multivariate time series. Modeling financial time series with S-PLUS®, pages 385–429, 2006.
Citations (165)

Summary

  • The paper introduces the TiDE model, a simple MLP-based encoder-decoder that achieves reliable long-term forecasting with up to 10x faster training than Transformer models.
  • The study leverages a theoretical framework where the linear analogue of TiDE approximates near-optimal error rates for linear dynamical systems, effectively modeling non-linear dependencies.
  • Extensive experiments on Weather, Traffic, and Electricity datasets demonstrate TiDE's superior accuracy and efficiency, making it suitable for resource-constrained forecasting applications.

An Examination of the "Long-term Forecasting with TiDE: Time-series Dense Encoder" Paper

The paper "Long-term Forecasting with TiDE: Time-series Dense Encoder" presents a novel approach to time-series forecasting by leveraging the computational efficiency of Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) to outperform traditionally adopted Transformer-based architectures for long-term forecasting tasks. The authors introduce the TiDE model, a simple yet effective MLP-based encoder-decoder architecture that combines the strengths of linear models with the ability to model non-linear dependencies and covariates.

The core premise of the research lies in challenging the prevalence of Transformer models in time-series prediction tasks. Despite the Transformer model's success in areas such as NLP, audio, and vision, its adaptation to time-series forecasting has not consistently demonstrated superiority in performance over simpler models. The TiDE model capitalizes on this gap, proposing an architecture that maintains the simplicity and linearity of traditional models while enhancing predictability through non-linear transformations.

Key Aspects of the TiDE Model

  1. Model Architecture: The TiDE model eschews conventional recurrent and convolutional layers, employing dense MLPs for both encoding and decoding phases. This choice circumvents the computational and memory complexity often associated with Transformer models. The encoding process utilizes MLPs to effectively handle covariates and static attributes, while the decoding process maps encoded features to future time points, enhanced with a novel temporal decoder that incorporates future covariate information.
  2. Theoretical Foundation: A significant theoretical contribution of the paper is demonstrating that under certain assumptions, the linear analogue of the TiDE model can achieve near-optimal error rates for linear dynamical systems (LDS). This insight underscores the capability of linear models to perform competitively in settings often dominated by more complex architectures like Transformers.
  3. Empirical Validation: The authors conduct extensive empirical evaluations across multiple datasets (including Weather, Traffic, and Electricity) to validate the performance of the TiDE model against state-of-the-art baselines. Notably, TiDE exhibits superior or comparable performance while consistently achieving 5-10x faster training and inference times compared to Transformer architectures.

Implications and Prospects

The TiDE model presents promising evidence that the incorporation of MLPs for long-term forecasting tasks provides a computationally efficient alternative with minimal loss in prediction accuracy. Its success challenges the prevailing assumption of the necessity of deep attention mechanisms and offers a simpler paradigm for time-series modeling.

Practical Implications: The reduction in computational requirements makes TiDE favorable for real-world applications where processing resources can be constrained, particularly in edge computing or mobile environments. The ability to incorporate covariates efficiently allows for enhanced forecasting in domains like energy, finance, and transportation where external variables significantly influence future states.

Theoretical Implications: The theoretical exploration of LDS approximations opens avenues for further analytical studies comparing architectural decisions in neural network design across varying domains of temporal data prediction. The results provoke reflection on the conditions under which simpler models not only suffice but excel, emphasizing the importance of understanding the data characteristics that drive model performance.

Future Directions: Further research may delve into extending the TiDE framework to incorporate other forms of structural biases inherent in time-series data, such as periodicity or heteroscedasticity. Additionally, exploring the integration of TiDE within the ecosystem of hybrid models that balance interpretability and complexity could enhance its applicability across diverse sectors.

In conclusion, the paper presents a well-grounded argument for re-evaluating computational models used in time-series forecasting, elevating the discourse on simplicity versus complexity in model choice. Through theoretical backing and empirical substantiation, the TiDE model demonstrates proficient long-term predictive capabilities with substantial computational benefits.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com