Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mapping of attention mechanisms to a generalized Potts model (2304.07235v4)

Published 14 Apr 2023 in cond-mat.dis-nn, cond-mat.stat-mech, cs.CL, and stat.ML

Abstract: Transformers are neural networks that revolutionized natural language processing and machine learning. They process sequences of inputs, like words, using a mechanism called self-attention, which is trained via masked LLMing (MLM). In MLM, a word is randomly masked in an input sequence, and the network is trained to predict the missing word. Despite the practical success of transformers, it remains unclear what type of data distribution self-attention can learn efficiently. Here, we show analytically that if one decouples the treatment of word positions and embeddings, a single layer of self-attention learns the conditionals of a generalized Potts model with interactions between sites and Potts colors. Moreover, we show that training this neural network is exactly equivalent to solving the inverse Potts problem by the so-called pseudo-likelihood method, well known in statistical physics. Using this mapping, we compute the generalization error of self-attention in a model scenario analytically using the replica method.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee,  and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,”  (2019), arXiv:1810.04805 .
  2. J. Howard and S. Ruder,  (2018), arXiv:1801.06146 .
  3. A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, et al., “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,”  (2018).
  4. OpenAI, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774v2  (2023).
  5. E. Gardner and B. Derrida, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 22, 1983 (1989).
  6. A. Engel and C. Van den Broeck, Statistical Mechanics of Learning (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
  7. A. Ingrosso and S. Goldt, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2201854119 (2022).
  8. M. Refinetti and S. Goldt, in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2022) pp. 18499–18519.
  9. H. Cui and L. Zdeborová, arXiv:2305.11041  (2023).
  10. R. B. Potts, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 48, 106–109 (1952).
  11. F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).
  12. Z. Dai, H. Liu, Q. V. Le,  and M. Tan, “Coatnet: Marrying convolution and attention for all data sizes,”  (2021), arXiv:2106.04803 .
  13. R. Rende, L. L. Viteritti, L. Bardone, F. Becca,  and S. Goldt, “A simple linear algebra identity to optimize large-scale neural network quantum states,”  (2023), arXiv:2310.05715 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  14. L. L. Viteritti, R. Rende, A. Parola, S. Goldt,  and F. Becca, “Transformer wave function for the shastry-sutherland model: emergence of a spin-liquid phase,”  (2023), arXiv:2311.16889 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  15. J. Besag, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) 24, 179 (1975).
  16. S. Cocco and R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090601 (2011).
  17. F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2012, P08015 (2012).
  18. A. Hyvärinen, Neural Computation 18, 2283 (2006).
  19. E. Aurell and M. Ekeberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 090201 (2012).
  20. D. Saad and S. A. Solla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4337 (1995).
  21. M. Biehl and H. Schwarze, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 28, 643 (1995).
  22. P. Lippe, “UvA Deep Learning Tutorials,” https://uvadlc-notebooks.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (2022).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Riccardo Rende (10 papers)
  2. Federica Gerace (13 papers)
  3. Alessandro Laio (43 papers)
  4. Sebastian Goldt (33 papers)
Citations (14)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that decoupling positional and token embeddings enables a single-layer self-attention to learn conditional distributions akin to a generalized Potts model.
  • It reveals that training such a network is mathematically equivalent to solving the inverse Potts problem using pseudo-likelihood methods, validated by numerical experiments.
  • The study highlights that a factored attention architecture efficiently reconstructs interaction matrices, suggesting promising directions for future transformer designs.

Insights from "What does self-attention learn from Masked LLMling?"

The paper "What does self-attention learn from Masked LLMling?" by Riccardo Rende et al. presents a detailed analytical perspective on the learning dynamics of the self-attention mechanism within transformers under the masked LLMling (MLM) objective. With an emphasis on statistical physics, it delineates the linkage between a single layer of self-attention and the family of conditional probabilities characterized by a generalised Potts model.

Analytical Mapping and Learning Dynamics

The research identifies a critical aspect of self-attention's capacity to learn conditional distributions within sequences when the system is viewed through the lens of a generalised Potts model. By analytically decoupling positional embeddings from token representations, the authors demonstrate that a single layer of self-attention effectively learns the conditionals of a Potts model characterized by interactions between positions and Potts colors (word embeddings). This model has been historically significant in statistical physics for capturing spin interactions, thus offering robust insights into the potential of masked LLMling tasks when structured data is redefined as systems of spins.

A significant contribution of this analysis is the revelation that training a single-layer self-attention network on such data is mathematically equivalent to addressing the inverse Potts problem through the pseudo-likelihood method. This equivalence is validated through the replica method, which allows precise computation of generalization error under these conditions.

Numerical Results and Observations

Testing their hypothesis on structured data generated by the Potts Hamiltonian, the authors deliver strong numerical results indicating that a single-layer self-attention network can indeed accurately learn the interaction matrix of the generating Potts model. The derived attention maps in these cases effectively reconstruct the underlying interactions, underscoring the precision and efficacy of decoupling the treatment of positional and token embeddings.

The research further illustrates that a standard (vanilla) transformer, using a multi-layered stack of attention, only achieves comparable results at greater computational cost, underpinning the efficiency of the factored approach. The paper emphasizes that this simplification aligns perfectly with the pseudo-likelihood estimators, thereby ensuring statistical consistency and favorable generalization properties.

Theoretical Implications and Future Directions

This work establishes a foundational understanding of what self-attention learns within an MLM task, speculating that higher-order interactions necessitate multi-layer architectures. It encourages future exploration into the learning dynamics of deeper transformer models, potentially extending these theoretical frameworks to other domains, such as unsupervised learning within heterogeneous datasets and other forms of structured data beyond NLP.

The findings could influence future transformer architectures, particularly in emphasizing factored attention mechanisms to capture complex data distributions. Extensions of this research could evaluate these interactions' resilience across varying datasets, further refining the architectural decisions for transformers, notably in areas like bioinformatics and image processing, where the intrinsic structure of data can provide salient insights.

In summary, this paper offers a precise and computationally efficient approach to understanding self-attention's learning under MLM objectives through the generalised Potts model, paving the way for both theoretical developments and practical advancements in transformer architectures and their applications.