Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep learning reduces sensor requirements for gust rejection on a small uncrewed aerial vehicle morphing wing (2304.03133v2)

Published 6 Apr 2023 in cs.RO, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: There is a growing need for uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) to operate in cities. However, the uneven urban landscape and complex street systems cause large-scale wind gusts that challenge the safe and effective operation of UAVs. Current gust alleviation methods rely on traditional control surfaces and computationally expensive modeling to select a control action, leading to a slower response. Here, we used deep reinforcement learning to create an autonomous gust alleviation controller for a camber-morphing wing. This method reduced gust impact by 84%, directly from real-time, on-board pressure signals. Notably, we found that gust alleviation using signals from only three pressure taps was statistically indistinguishable from using six signals. This reduced-sensor fly-by-feel control opens the door to UAV missions in previously inoperable locations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (63)
  1. Mission planning of autonomous UAVs for urban surveillance with evolutionary algorithms. In 2013 10th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA), pages 828–833, June 2013. ISSN: 1948-3457.
  2. Simulation of intelligent unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) for military surveillance. In 2013 international conference on advanced computer science and information systems (ICACSIS), pages 161–166. IEEE, 2013.
  3. Autonomous Aerial Delivery Vehicles, a Survey of Techniques on how Aerial Package Delivery is Achieved, July 2022. arXiv:2110.02429 [cs, eess].
  4. Traffic management and resource allocation for UAV-based parcel delivery in low-altitude urban space. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 143:103808, October 2022.
  5. A. J. Dutt. Wind flow in an urban environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 19(1):495–506, October 1991.
  6. Wake Characteristics of Tall Buildings in a Realistic Urban Canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 172(2):239–270, August 2019.
  7. Intelligent Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Platform for Smart Cities. In 2016 Joint 8th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 17th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS), pages 729–733, August 2016.
  8. Generalization through Simulation: Integrating Simulated and Real Data into Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Autonomous Flight. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6008–6014, May 2019. ISSN: 2577-087X.
  9. A Method for Evaluating and Selecting Suitable Hardware for Deployment of Embedded System on UAVs. Sensors, 20(16):4420, January 2020. Number: 16 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  10. Survey on computational-intelligence-based UAV path planning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 158:54–64, October 2018.
  11. Emerging Urban Challenge: RPAS/UAVs in Cities. In 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), pages 546–553, May 2019. ISSN: 2325-2944.
  12. A review of avian-inspired morphing for UAV flight control. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 132:100825, July 2022.
  13. Peregrine Falcons: The Neighbors Upstairs. In Clint W. Boal and Cheryl R. Dykstra, editors, Urban Raptors: Ecology and Conservation of Birds of Prey in Cities, pages 180–195. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC, 2018.
  14. Bird wings act as a suspension system that rejects gusts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1937):20201748, October 2020. Publisher: Royal Society.
  15. Wing tucks are a response to atmospheric turbulence in the soaring flight of the steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(101):20140645, December 2014. Publisher: Royal Society.
  16. A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 22(9):823–877, 2011. Publisher: Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.
  17. Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent material systems and structures, 27(17):2289–2312, 2016. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
  18. Experimental testing of spanwise morphing trailing edge concept. In Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2013, volume 8688, pages 352–364. SPIE, 2013.
  19. A tale of two tails: Developing an avian inspired morphing actuator for yaw control and stability. Bioinspiration & biomimetics, 13(2):026008, 2018. Publisher: IOP Publishing.
  20. Novel, bidirectional, variable-camber airfoil via macro-fiber composite actuators. Journal of aircraft, 47(1):303–314, 2010.
  21. James W High. Method of fabricating NASA-standard macro-fiber composite piezoelectric actuators. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 2003.
  22. Alexander M Pankonien. Smart Material Wing Morphing for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2015.
  23. Stall recovery of a morphing wing via extended nonlinear lifting-line theory. AIAA Journal, 55(9):2956–2963, 2017. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  24. Gust loads on aircraft. The Aeronautical Journal, 123(1266):1216–1274, August 2019. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Report on Behavior of Aeroplanes in Gusts, January 1917. NTRS Author Affiliations: NTRS Report/Patent Number: NACA-TR-1 NTRS Document ID: 19930091026 NTRS Research Center: Legacy CDMS (CDMS).
  26. Survey of applications of active control technology for gust alleviation and new challenges for lighter-weight aircraft. Technical report, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, 2012.
  27. Considerations for Automated Nap-of-the-Earth Rotorcraft Flight. In 1988 American Control Conference, pages 967–976, June 1988.
  28. Model Predictive Control for Aircraft Load Alleviation: Opportunities and Challenges. In 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), pages 2417–2424, June 2018. ISSN: 2378-5861.
  29. Mfc morphing aileron control with intelligent sensing. In Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, volume 86274, page V001T03A013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022.
  30. Gust prediction via artificial hair sensor array and neural network. In A Tribute Conference Honoring Daniel Inman, volume 10172, pages 55–64. SPIE, April 2017.
  31. Hybrid Models for Situational Awareness of an Aerial Vehicle from Multimodal Sensing. AIAA Journal, 61(1):305–314, January 2023. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  32. Bio-inspired intelligent sensing materials for fly-by-feel autonomous vehicles. In 2012 IEEE SENSORS, pages 1–3, October 2012. ISSN: 1930-0395.
  33. Fly-by-Feel Control of an Aeroelastic Aircraft Using Distributed Multirate Kalman Filtering. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(9):2323–2329, 2017. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics _eprint: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002799.
  34. Fly-by-Feel Sensing and Control: Aeroservoelasticity. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, June 2014.
  35. Flexible smart sensing skin for “Fly-by-Feel” morphing aircraft. Science China Technological Sciences, 65(1):1–29, January 2022.
  36. Aerodynamic State and Loads Estimation Using Bioinspired Distributed Sensing. Journal of Aircraft, 58(4):704–716, 2021. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics _eprint: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C036224.
  37. Wind tunnel testing of an avian-inspired morphing wing with distributed pressure sensing. In 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 290–299, June 2022. ISSN: 2575-7296.
  38. Adaptive Feedforward Control for Gust Load Alleviation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 33(3):862–872, May 2010.
  39. Gust response modeling and alleviation scheme design for an elastic aircraft. Science China Technological Sciences, 53(11):3110–3118, November 2010.
  40. Optimal Control Framework for Gust Load Alleviation using Real time Aerodynamic Force Prediction from Artificial Hair Sensor Array. In 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, January 2018. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  41. Model Predictive Control for Gust Load Alleviation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(17):27–32, January 2012.
  42. Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning, December 2013. arXiv:1312.5602 [cs].
  43. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, 2018.
  44. Deep reinforcement learning achieves multifunctional morphing airfoil control. Journal of Composite Materials, page 00219983221137644, November 2022. Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM.
  45. Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms, August 2017. arXiv:1707.06347 [cs].
  46. Reinforcement Learning to Control Lift Coefficient Using Distributed Sensors on a Wind Tunnel Model. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022. _eprint: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2022-0966.
  47. Sim-to-Real Transfer for Fixed-Wing Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle: Pitch Control by High-Fidelity Modelling and Domain Randomization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(4):11735–11742, October 2022. Conference Name: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.
  48. Yonghong Li. Gust Load Alleviation by Fluidic Actuators on a Blended-Wing-Body Configuration. Thesis, page 222, 2020.
  49. A perspective on machine learning methods in turbulence modeling. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 44(1):e202100002, 2021. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/gamm.202100002.
  50. Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51(1):357–377, 2019. _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547.
  51. Kevin P. T. Haughn and Daniel J. Inman. Autonomous Learning in a Pseudo-Episodic Physical Environment. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 104(2):32, February 2022.
  52. Preliminary Study of Applied Load Factors in Bumpy Air. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1931. Google-Books-ID: MmTkmfSgbPUC.
  53. Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of a Flat Plate Encountering Large-Amplitude Sharp-Edged Gust. AIAA Journal, 60(3):1549–1564, 2022. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics _eprint: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060683.
  54. Drones for search and rescue. In 1st International Workshop on Human-Drone Interaction, 2019.
  55. The potential use of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) in mountain search and rescue operations. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36(4):583–588, April 2018.
  56. Tingting Zou and Li Zhou. Mechanical property analysis and experimental demonstration of zero Poisson’s ratio mixed cruciform honeycomb. Materials Research Express, 4(4):045702, April 2017. Publisher: IOP Publishing.
  57. Horizontal planform morphing tail for an avian inspired uav using shape memory alloys. In Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, volume 51951, page V002T06A003. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018.
  58. Pressure Tap Effects on the Lift Measurement of an Airfoil Section. In 32nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Washington, D.C., June 2016. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  59. Phil Tabor. Youtube-Code-Repository, March 2023. original-date: 2018-08-09T00:21:29Z.
  60. 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 151:107398, April 2021.
  61. Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network, November 2015. arXiv:1505.00853 [cs, stat].
  62. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, January 2017. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs].
  63. Gust Alleviation and Wind Tunnel Test by Using Combined Feedforward Control and Feedback Control. Aerospace, 9(4):225, April 2022. Number: 4 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com