Summary of "LaTeX Author Guidelines for WACV Proceedings"
This document provides comprehensive guidance for authors intending to submit manuscripts to the Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) proceedings using the LaTeX document preparation system. Authored by experienced members of the academic community, the guidelines are meticulously tailored to ensure uniformity and clarity in the presentation of scholarly work. The document covers a wide array of considerations including formatting, structure, and submission protocols.
Key Details
The guidelines commence with an abstract that, while formatted in a standardized manner, typically does not include substantive content. The introduction underscores updates and modifications from previous guidelines, aiming to eliminate common ambiguities encountered by authors.
The paper mandates that all manuscripts be submitted in English and addresses issues of dual submission by directing authors to the relevant policies on the WACV website. Importantly, the length of submissions is strictly capped at eight pages, excluding references. Papers exceeding this limit will be automatically rejected, with no allowances for overlength, emphasizing the importance of conciseness and adherence to formatting rules.
The inclusion of a printed ruler in the review version assists reviewers in providing precise feedback. Authors are encouraged to maintain consistent formatting when preparing their submissions, with specific instructions on type style, use of equations, and cross-referencing.
Blind Review Process
An essential aspect covered is the requirement for blind review compliance. Authors are advised to avoid self-referential language that might compromise anonymity. This section reinforces the academic standard for citation discussion, cautioning authors against inadvertently revealing their identities through references to previous work or acknowledgments.
Formatting Specifications
The article delineates detailed specifications for formatting texts, figures, tables, and equations within the manuscript. Notable points include the restriction of the text to a two-column layout and specific margin measurements suited for either US or A4 paper sizes. Font styles and sizes are prescribed, notably Times in various point sizes for different elements within the paper.
Mathematical and Technical Documentation
The guide enforces the proper numbering of equations for ease of reference, aligning with best practices for mathematical presentation in academic papers. Additionally, the document emphasizes consistency in the presentation of figures and tables, ensuring these elements are legible in both electronic and printed forms.
Use of Graphics and Color Vision Considerations
Regarding illustrations and graphs, authors are prompted to focus on clarity and accessibility, particularly for readers with color vision deficiencies. Authors should introduce additional features in graphs to accommodate such considerations, thereby ensuring the accessibility of the document to a broader audience.
Administrative and Procedural Requirements
The final sections of the document cover administrative tasks related to submission, including the necessity for a signed IEEE copyright release form. This underscores the legal and procedural elements adjacent to the academic submission process.
Implications and Future Potential
The detailed nature of these guidelines not only seeks to uphold consistency across submissions but also serves as an educational tool for authors, particularly those newer to the field of computer vision. These guidelines reflect broader industry trends towards standardizing submissions for consistency in review and publication. Moving forward, the protocols outlined may evolve with technological advancements in document preparation and review processes, potentially incorporating automated checks for compliance and more dynamic review capabilities.
In summary, the WACV LaTeX Author Guidelines serve as an essential resource for authors, promoting orderly and professional presentation of research through careful adherence to established norms. These guidelines not only facilitate the review process but also contribute to the overall readability and integrity of the conference proceedings.