Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

CHGNet: Pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modeling (2302.14231v2)

Published 28 Feb 2023 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci and cs.LG

Abstract: The simulation of large-scale systems with complex electron interactions remains one of the greatest challenges for the atomistic modeling of materials. Although classical force fields often fail to describe the coupling between electronic states and ionic rearrangements, the more accurate \textit{ab-initio} molecular dynamics suffers from computational complexity that prevents long-time and large-scale simulations, which are essential to study many technologically relevant phenomena, such as reactions, ion migrations, phase transformations, and degradation. In this work, we present the Crystal Hamiltonian Graph neural Network (CHGNet) as a novel machine-learning interatomic potential (MLIP), using a graph-neural-network-based force field to model a universal potential energy surface. CHGNet is pretrained on the energies, forces, stresses, and magnetic moments from the Materials Project Trajectory Dataset, which consists of over 10 years of density functional theory static and relaxation trajectories of $\sim 1.5$ million inorganic structures. The explicit inclusion of magnetic moments enables CHGNet to learn and accurately represent the orbital occupancy of electrons, enhancing its capability to describe both atomic and electronic degrees of freedom. We demonstrate several applications of CHGNet in solid-state materials, including charge-informed molecular dynamics in Li$_x$MnO$_2$, the finite temperature phase diagram for Li$_x$FePO$_4$ and Li diffusion in garnet conductors. We critically analyze the significance of including charge information for capturing appropriate chemistry, and we provide new insights into ionic systems with additional electronic degrees of freedom that can not be observed by previous MLIPs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 2001).
  2. W. J. Mortier, S. K. Ghosh, and S. Shankar, Electronegativity-equalization method for the calculation of atomic charges in molecules, Journal of the American Chemical Society 108, 4315–4320 (1986).
  3. D. M. York and W. Yang, A chemical potential equalization method for molecular simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 104, 159–172 (1996).
  4. A. K. Rappe and W. A. Goddard, Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 95, 3358–3363 (1991).
  5. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Physical Review 140, A1133 (1965).
  6. J. Reed and G. Ceder, Role of electronic structure in the susceptibility of metastable transition-metal oxide structures to transformation, Chemical Reviews 104, 4513 (2004).
  7. N. Artrith, T. Morawietz, and J. Behler, High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: Applications to zinc oxide, Physical Review B 83, 153101 (2011).
  8. J. Gasteiger, J. Groß, and S. Günnemann, Directional message passing for molecular graphs, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2020).
  9. S. Takamoto, S. Izumi, and J. Li, Teanet: Universal neural network interatomic potential inspired by iterative electronic relaxations, Computational Materials Science 207, 111280 (2022a).
  10. C. Chen and S. P. Ong, A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table, Nature Computational Science 2, 718–728 (2022).
  11. X. Xie, K. A. Persson, and D. W. Small, Incorporating electronic information into machine learning potential energy surfaces via approaching the ground-state electronic energy as a function of atom-based electronic populations, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16, 4256–4270 (2020).
  12. M. Geiger and T. Smidt, e3nn: Euclidean neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09453  (2022).
  13. T. Xie and J. C. Grossman, Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties, Physical Review Letters 120, 145301 (2018).
  14. K. Choudhary and B. DeCost, Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions, npj Computational Materials 7, 185 (2021).
  15. C. Wolverton and A. Zunger, First-principles prediction of vacancy order-disorder and intercalation battery voltages in Lix𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCoO2, Physical Review Letters 81, 606 (1998).
  16. J. Reed, G. Ceder, and A. V. D. Ven, Layered-to-Spinel Phase Transition in Lix𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTMnO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 4, A78 (2001).
  17. K. Kang and G. Ceder, Factors that affect Li mobility in layered lithium transition metal oxides, Physical Review B 74, 094105 (2006).
  18. F. Zhou, T. Maxisch, and G. Ceder, Configurational Electronic Entropy and the Phase Diagram of Mixed-Valence Oxides: The Case of Lix𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTFePO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Physical Review Letters 97, 155704 (2006).
  19. A. Walle and G. Ceder, Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations, Journal of Phase Equilibria 23, 348 (2002).
  20. J. L. Dodd, R. Yazami, and B. Fultz, Phase Diagram of Lix𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTFePO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 9, A151 (2006).
  21. Y. Sun and S. Dai, High-entropy materials for catalysis: A new frontier, Science Advances 7, 1 (2021).
  22. B. Silvi and A. Savin, Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions, Nature 371, 683 (1994).
  23. R. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Physical Review B 47, 1651 (1993).
  24. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996).
  25. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 59, 1758 (1999).
  26. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996).
  27. L. Wang, T. Maxisch, and G. Ceder, Oxidation energies of transition metal oxides within the GGA+U framework, Physical Review B 73, 195107 (2006).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Bowen Deng (30 papers)
  2. Peichen Zhong (16 papers)
  3. KyuJung Jun (8 papers)
  4. Janosh Riebesell (10 papers)
  5. Kevin Han (21 papers)
  6. Christopher J. Bartel (21 papers)
  7. Gerbrand Ceder (72 papers)
Citations (18)

Summary

An Expert Analysis of "CHGNet: Pretrained Universal Neural Network Potential for Charge-Informed Atomistic Modeling"

The paper "CHGNet: Pretrained Universal Neural Network Potential for Charge-Informed Atomistic Modeling" presents a significant advancement in the field of atomistic modeling, specifically targeting the challenge of simulating large-scale systems with complex electron interactions. Notably, the authors introduce the Crystal Hamiltonian Graph neural Network (CHGNet), a machine-learning interatomic potential (MLIP) that incorporates charge information for modeling materials. CHGNet is grounded in the capabilities of graph neural networks (GNNs) and is pretrained on extensive data from the Materials Project Trajectory Dataset. This dataset includes densities, forces, stresses, and magnetic moment information from approximately 1.5 million inorganic structures.

Key Innovations and Experimental Outcomes

The CHGNet's novel architecture leverages the properties of GNNs to model interactions at the atomic scale by representing materials as graphs. One of the pivotal advancements is the inclusion of magnetic moments as a proxy for charge states, which enhances CHGNet's ability to capture complex electronic interactions. This allows for a more accurate prediction of potential energy surfaces and subsequent material properties.

The paper details several applications that illustrate the robustness and utility of CHGNet:

  1. Phase Transformations and Ionic Systems: The paper demonstrates the applicability of CHGNet in modeling charge-informed molecular dynamics in Lix_xMnO2_2. The tool's ability to simulate the charge transfer during phase transformations offers insights into the dynamic charge and ion motion coupling, which was previously challenging for MLIPs lacking explicit charge considerations.
  2. Phase Diagrams with Electronic Entropy: CHGNet's incorporation of charge states enables the accurate prediction of phase diagrams, as shown with Lix_xFePO4_4. By taking into account electronic entropy, CHGNet accurately models the miscibility gap and phase transitions, aligning with experimental observations.
  3. Ion Diffusion in Conductors: The research highlights CHGNet's strength in capturing the intricate diffusion mechanisms in garnet-type Li-superionic conductors. By simulating larger time scales, CHGNet provides insights into the non-linear increase in ionic conductivity with slight compositional changes.

The paper meticulously records mean absolute errors achieved on the test sets, with CHGNet delivering results that are consistent with or exceed state-of-the-art in terms of predictive accuracy for energies, forces, stresses, and magnetic moments.

Implications and Future Prospects

The implications of this work are both practical and theoretical. Practically, CHGNet presents a scalable solution for simulating technologically relevant materials, particularly those involving transition metal oxides where valence states play a critical role. The explicit inclusion of magnetic moments as charge-state indicators establishes a pathway towards more chemically accurate predictions, facilitating studies on materials that undergo complex electron-ion coupling during their functional operations.

Theoretically, the integration of charge constraints introduces a novel dimension to the evolution of machine learning approaches in materials science, opening doors for the exploration of interactive phenomena previously beyond reach using classical potentials. The charge-informative nature of CHGNet could further guide developments in the understanding and modeling of configurational entropies and electronic entropies at varied scales.

Future work could extend CHGNet's capabilities by incorporating more intricate charge representations beyond magnetic moments, possibly using partitioned electron densities or localized orbitals. Such enhancements could address potential limitations in non-magnetic systems and lead to universally applicable models across diverse material classes.

In summary, CHGNet emerges as a substantial addition to atomistic modeling resources, boasting the ability to simulate large, complex systems with detailed charge information while maintaining computational efficiency and predictive accuracy. This work lays the groundwork for subsequent AI-driven advancements in materials discovery and optimization.