Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LightGCL: Simple Yet Effective Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation (2302.08191v3)

Published 16 Feb 2023 in cs.IR and cs.LG

Abstract: Graph neural network (GNN) is a powerful learning approach for graph-based recommender systems. Recently, GNNs integrated with contrastive learning have shown superior performance in recommendation with their data augmentation schemes, aiming at dealing with highly sparse data. Despite their success, most existing graph contrastive learning methods either perform stochastic augmentation (e.g., node/edge perturbation) on the user-item interaction graph, or rely on the heuristic-based augmentation techniques (e.g., user clustering) for generating contrastive views. We argue that these methods cannot well preserve the intrinsic semantic structures and are easily biased by the noise perturbation. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective graph contrastive learning paradigm LightGCL that mitigates these issues impairing the generality and robustness of CL-based recommenders. Our model exclusively utilizes singular value decomposition for contrastive augmentation, which enables the unconstrained structural refinement with global collaborative relation modeling. Experiments conducted on several benchmark datasets demonstrate the significant improvement in performance of our model over the state-of-the-arts. Further analyses demonstrate the superiority of LightGCL's robustness against data sparsity and popularity bias. The source code of our model is available at https://github.com/HKUDS/LightGCL.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Measuring and relieving the over-smoothing problem for graph neural networks from the topological view. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pp.  3438–3445, 2020a.
  2. Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach. In AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pp. 27–34, 2020b.
  3. Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pp.  27–34, 2020c.
  4. Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions. SIAM review, 53(2):217–288, 2011.
  5. Contrastive multi-view representation learning on graphs. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 4116–4126. PMLR, 2020.
  6. Neural collaborative filtering. In International conference on world wide web (WWW), pp. 173–182, 2017.
  7. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In International conference on research and development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp.  639–648, 2020.
  8. Automated self-supervised learning for graphs. ICLR, 2022.
  9. Yehuda Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp.  426–434, 2008.
  10. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30–37, 2009.
  11. Task-adaptive neural process for user cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference (WWW), pp.  1306–1316, 2021.
  12. Improving graph collaborative filtering with neighborhood-enriched contrastive learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference (WWW), pp. 2320–2329, 2022.
  13. Interest-aware message-passing gcn for recommendation. In The Web Conference (WWW), pp.  1296–1305, 2021a.
  14. Leveraging distribution alignment via stein path for cross-domain cold-start recommendation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 34:19223–19234, 2021b.
  15. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018.
  16. Graph representation learning via graphical mutual information maximization. In The Web Conference (WWW), pp.  259–270, 2020.
  17. Image denoising using the higher order singular value decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(4):849–862, 2012.
  18. Anand Rangarajan. Learning matrix space image representations. In International Workshop on Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  153–168. Springer, 2001.
  19. Adversarial graph augmentation to improve graph contrastive learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 34:15920–15933, 2021.
  20. Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11), 2008.
  21. Deep graph infomax. ICLR, 2(3):4, 2019.
  22. Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp.  1101–1110, 2020a.
  23. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp.  165–174, 2019.
  24. Disentangled graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp.  1001–1010, 2020b.
  25. Self-supervised graph learning for recommendation. In International conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), pp.  726–735, 2021.
  26. Robust tensor graph convolutional networks via t-svd based graph augmentation. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp.  2090–2099, 2022.
  27. Simgrace: A simple framework for graph contrastive learning without data augmentation. In the ACM Web Conference (WWW), pp.  1070–1079, 2022a.
  28. Hypergraph contrastive collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2022, Madrid, Spain, July 11-15, 2022., 2022b.
  29. Self-supervised hypergraph transformer for recommender systems. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2022, Washington DC, USA, August 14-18, 2022., 2022c.
  30. Contrastive learning for sequential recommendation. In International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 1259–1273. IEEE, 2022.
  31. Autogcl: Automated graph contrastive learning via learnable view generators. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), volume 36, pp.  8892–8900, 2022.
  32. Graph contrastive learning with augmentations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33:5812–5823, 2020.
  33. Self-supervised multi-channel hypergraph convolutional network for social recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pp.  413–424, 2021.
  34. Are graph augmentations necessary? simple graph contrastive learning for recommendation. In International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp.  1294–1303, 2022a.
  35. Sail: Self-augmented graph contrastive learning. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), volume 36, pp.  8927–8935, 2022b.
  36. Star-gcn: Stacked and reconstructed graph convolutional networks for recommender systems. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2019.
  37. Enhancing sequential recommendation with graph contrastive learning. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2022.
  38. Deep graph contrastive representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04131, 2020.
  39. An empirical study of graph contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01116, 2021a.
  40. Graph contrastive learning with adaptive augmentation. In The Web Conference (WWW), pp.  2069–2080, 2021b.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Xuheng Cai (5 papers)
  2. Chao Huang (244 papers)
  3. Lianghao Xia (65 papers)
  4. Xubin Ren (17 papers)
Citations (145)

Summary

An Examination of LightGCL: Enhancing Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommender Systems

The paper "LightGCL: Simple Yet Effective Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation" introduces a novel graph-based strategy to enhance recommender systems through graph neural networks (GNNs) and contrastive learning (CL). The prescribed method, LightGCL, is a promising contribution in the field of collaborative filtering, particularly with its ability to effectively harness under-utilized singular value decomposition (SVD) within the framework.

The authors characterize traditional graph contrastive learning approaches as being susceptible to biases and noise-induced perturbations when they utilize stochastic augmentation techniques such as node or edge perturbations. They argue that such methods may fail to retain intrinsic semantic structures, thereby reducing robustness and generality. LightGCL, as proposed, circumvents these limitations by leveraging SVD to facilitate contrastive augmentation, enabling a structured refinement of user-item interactions. Notably, this approach introduces minimal structural assumptions and emphasizes the understanding of global collaborative relations.

Methodological Innovations

The core innovation of LightGCL lies in its strategic use of SVD for graph augmentation. Rather than relying on heuristic manipulations of graph structure, the authors assert that SVD-based augmentation refines recommendations by distilling pertinent information from the user-item interaction matrix. Experiments indicate that this global perspective preserves essential semantics while being robust against common challenges such as data sparsity and popularity bias inherent in recommendation tasks.

The authors propose a streamlined contrastive learning model that contrasts embeddings from main view and SVD view, allowing the system to maintain its embedding training efficiency. Importantly, this reduction from three view to two views utilizing SVD representation reduces computational overhead without degrading performance.

Experimental Results

The efficacy of LightGCL is demonstrated through rigorous experimentation across multiple real-world datasets, including Yelp, Gowalla, and Amazon-book. The proposed method consistently outperforms a range of benchmark systems, including state-of-the-art models like SimGCL and SGL. For instance, LightGCL improves Recall@20 and NDCG@20 metrics significantly across datasets, affirming the strength of its augmentation strategy.

The paper also underscores LightGCL's efficiency, with batch processing complexities significantly reduced due to its simplified contrastive learning framework and preprocessing decisions strategically deferred to a one-time SVD calculation.

Implications and Future Work

LightGCL's advancements offer substantial practical implications for designing recommender systems that perform reliably under constraint conditions of data sparsity and noise. By effectively balancing between preserving local dependencies and exploiting global collaborative signals, LightGCL showcases a robust strategy that can be potentially scaled to larger and more complex datasets.

The theoretical and practical implications of LightGCL suggest trajectories for future work. Integrating causal inference could provide deeper insights into user-item interactions, further refining the augmentation process. Additionally, exploring the flexibility of using alternative matrix factorization techniques or hybrid approaches could yield further performance enhancements.

In conclusion, LightGCL presents a compellingly simple yet effective approach to graph contrastive learning in recommender systems. By leveraging SVD, it establishes a new paradigm in refining collaborative filtering methods and sets an exciting precedent for subsequent advancements in graph-based learning frameworks.