Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

RADIUS: Risk-Aware, Real-Time, Reachability-Based Motion Planning (2302.07933v3)

Published 15 Feb 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Deterministic methods for motion planning guarantee safety amidst uncertainty in obstacle locations by trying to restrict the robot from operating in any possible location that an obstacle could be in. Unfortunately, this can result in overly conservative behavior. Chance-constrained optimization can be applied to improve the performance of motion planning algorithms by allowing for a user-specified amount of bounded constraint violation. However, state-of-the-art methods rely either on moment-based inequalities, which can be overly conservative, or make it difficult to satisfy assumptions about the class of probability distributions used to model uncertainty. To address these challenges, this work proposes a real-time, risk-aware reachability-based motion planning framework called RADIUS. The method first generates a reachable set of parameterized trajectories for the robot offline. At run time, RADIUS computes a closed-form over-approximation of the risk of a collision with an obstacle. This is done without restricting the probability distribution used to model uncertainty to a simple class (e.g., Gaussian). Then, RADIUS performs real-time optimization to construct a trajectory that can be followed by the robot in a manner that is certified to have a risk of collision that is less than or equal to a user-specified threshold. The proposed algorithm is compared to several state-of-the-art chance-constrained and deterministic methods in simulation, and is shown to consistently outperform them in a variety of driving scenarios. A demonstration of the proposed framework on hardware is also provided.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. “Bridging the gap between safety and real-time performance in receding-horizon trajectory design for mobile robots” In The International Journal of Robotics Research 39.12, 2020, pp. 1419–1469 DOI: 10.1177/0278364920943266
  2. “REFINE: Reachability-based Trajectory Design using Robust Feedback Linearization and Zonotopes” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11997, 2022
  3. Lucas Janson, Edward Schmerling and Marco Pavone “Monte Carlo motion planning for robot trajectory optimization under uncertainty” In Robotics Research Springer, 2018, pp. 343–361
  4. Søren Asmussen and Peter W Glynn “Stochastic simulation: algorithms and analysis” Springer, 2007
  5. Allen Wang, Ashkan Jasour and Brian C. Williams “Non-Gaussian Chance-Constrained Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Under Agent Uncertainty” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5.4, 2020, pp. 6041–6048 DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3010755
  6. “Fast Risk Assessment for Autonomous Vehicles Using Learned Models of Agent Futures” In Robotics: Science and Systems 2, 2020, pp. 10
  7. Francesco Paolo Cantelli “Sui confini della probabilita” In Atti del Congresso Internazionale dei Matematici: Bologna del 3 al 10 de settembre di 1928, 1929, pp. 47–60
  8. Astghik Hakobyan, Gyeong Chan Kim and Insoon Yang “Risk-Aware Motion Planning and Control Using CVaR-Constrained Optimization” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4.4, 2019, pp. 3924–3931 DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2929980
  9. Mohamadreza Ahmadi, Xiaobin Xiong and Aaron D Ames “Risk-averse control via CVaR barrier functions: Application to bipedal robot locomotion” In IEEE Control Systems Letters 6 IEEE, 2021, pp. 878–883
  10. Anushri Dixit, Mohamadreza Ahmadi and Joel W Burdick “Risk-sensitive motion planning using entropic value-at-risk” In 2021 European Control Conference (ECC), 2021, pp. 1726–1732 IEEE
  11. Sean Vaskov “Fast and Safe Trajectory Optimization for Autonomous Mobile Robots using Reachability Analysis” In PhD Thesis, 2020
  12. Thomas D Gillespie “Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics”, 1992
  13. S Dieter, M Hiller and R Baradini “Vehicle Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2018
  14. Tae-Yun Kim, Samuel Jung and Wan-Suk Yoo “Advanced slip ratio for ensuring numerical stability of low-speed driving simulation: Part II—lateral slip ratio” In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of automobile engineering 233.11 SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2019, pp. 2903–2911
  15. “Handbook of hybrid systems control: theory, tools, applications” Cambridge University Press, 2009
  16. “Towards Provably Not-at-Fault Control of Autonomous Robots in Arbitrary Dynamic Environments”
  17. Ming-Yuan Yu, Ram Vasudevan and Matthew Johnson-Roberson “Occlusion-aware risk assessment for autonomous driving in urban environments” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4.2 IEEE, 2019, pp. 2235–2241
  18. Ming-Yuan Yu, Ram Vasudevan and Matthew Johnson-Roberson “Risk assessment and planning with bidirectional reachability for autonomous driving” In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 5363–5369 IEEE
  19. “Real-time ego-motion estimation using Lidar and a vehicle model based Extended Kalman Filter” In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2014, pp. 431–438 DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2014.6957728
  20. Jorge Almeida and Vitor Manuel Santos “Real time egomotion of a nonholonomic vehicle using LIDAR measurements” In Journal of Field Robotics 30.1 Wiley Online Library, 2013, pp. 129–141
  21. “Probabilistically safe robot planning with confidence-based human predictions” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00109, 2018
  22. Leonidas J Guibas, An Thanh Nguyen and Li Zhang “Zonotopes as bounding volumes.” In SODA 3, 2003, pp. 803–812
  23. Matthias Althoff “An introduction to CORA 2015” In Proc. of the Workshop on Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems, 2015
  24. Timothy Hickey, Qun Ju and Maarten H Van Emden “Interval arithmetic: From principles to implementation” In Journal of the ACM (JACM) 48.5 ACM New York, NY, USA, 2001, pp. 1038–1068
  25. Jean B Lasserre “Simple formula for integration of polynomials on a simplex” In BIT Numerical Mathematics 61.2 Springer, 2021, pp. 523–533
  26. Russel E Caflisch “Monte carlo and quasi-monte carlo methods” In Acta numerica 7 Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–49
  27. Ingram Olkin and Thomas A Trikalinos “Constructions for a bivariate beta distribution” In Statistics & Probability Letters 96 Elsevier, 2015, pp. 54–60
  28. “Can’t Touch This: Real-Time, Safe Motion Planning and Control for Manipulators Under Uncertainty”, 2023 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.13308
  29. Shreyas Kousik, Patrick Holmes and Ramanarayan Vasudevan “Technical Report: Safe, Aggressive Quadrotor Flight via Reachability-based Trajectory Design” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05728, 2019
  30. “Mean value theorems and functional equations” World Scientific, 1998
  31. Stefanie Manzinger, Christian Pek and Matthias Althoff “Using reachable sets for trajectory planning of automated vehicles” In IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 6.2 IEEE, 2020, pp. 232–248
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Jinsun Liu (9 papers)
  2. Challen Enninful Adu (9 papers)
  3. Lucas Lymburner (2 papers)
  4. Vishrut Kaushik (2 papers)
  5. Lena Trang (2 papers)
  6. Ram Vasudevan (98 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.