Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing (2302.06881v2)

Published 14 Feb 2023 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Knowledge tracing (KT) is the problem of predicting students' future performance based on their historical interactions with intelligent tutoring systems. Recently, many works present lots of special methods for applying deep neural networks to KT from different perspectives like model architecture, adversarial augmentation and etc., which make the overall algorithm and system become more and more complex. Furthermore, due to the lack of standardized evaluation protocol \citep{liu2022pykt}, there is no widely agreed KT baselines and published experimental comparisons become inconsistent and self-contradictory, i.e., the reported AUC scores of DKT on ASSISTments2009 range from 0.721 to 0.821 \citep{minn2018deep,yeung2018addressing}. Therefore, in this paper, we provide a strong but simple baseline method to deal with the KT task named \textsc{simpleKT}. Inspired by the Rasch model in psychometrics, we explicitly model question-specific variations to capture the individual differences among questions covering the same set of knowledge components that are a generalization of terms of concepts or skills needed for learners to accomplish steps in a task or a problem. Furthermore, instead of using sophisticated representations to capture student forgetting behaviors, we use the ordinary dot-product attention function to extract the time-aware information embedded in the student learning interactions. Extensive experiments show that such a simple baseline is able to always rank top 3 in terms of AUC scores and achieve 57 wins, 3 ties and 16 loss against 12 DLKT baseline methods on 7 public datasets of different domains. We believe this work serves as a strong baseline for future KT research. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/pykt-team/pykt-toolkit}\footnote{We merged our model to the \textsc{pyKT} benchmark at \url{https://pykt.org/}.}.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Zitao Liu (76 papers)
  2. Qiongqiong Liu (7 papers)
  3. Jiahao Chen (89 papers)
  4. Shuyan Huang (9 papers)
  5. Weiqi Luo (34 papers)
Citations (23)

Summary

Analysis of "simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing"

The paper "simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing" presents an intriguing prototype within the landscape of knowledge tracing (KT), which is predicated upon predicting a student's performance based on their historical interaction data. It engages in a methodical approach that evaluates and challenges the convolution of deep learning models in KT by introducing a simplified, yet effective, baseline model named simpleKT.

Motivation and Approach

The need for standardization and robust baselines in KT is emphasized early in the paper, addressing common inconsistencies and self-contradictions in evaluation practices. Inspired by the Rasch model in psychometrics, simpleKT explicitly models variations in questions to address individual differences among knowledge components (KCs). By leveraging question-specific embeddings and employing a straightforward dot-product attention mechanism, simpleKT aims to achieve compelling predictive performance without the encumbrances typical in many contemporary deep learning approaches.

The simplicity of the model is demonstrated by its avoidance of sophisticated components, such as complex neural network architectures, and instead utilizes straightforward techniques like the ordinary dot-product for attention mechanisms, offering both computational efficiency and robustness.

Empirical Evaluation

The authors conduct extensive experiments across seven diverse datasets. The results of these experiments show that simpleKT consistently achieves competitive, if not superior, performance relative to a wide array of DLKT baselines such as DKT, DKVMN, and AKT, among others. Notably, simpleKT often ranks within the top three performing models in terms of AUC scores and logs substantial victories across datasets, thereby cementing its status as a tough competitor.

One of the strong points of this research is in the evaluation of the simpleKT model under different context-rich datasets and prediction scenarios, including multi-step forecasting. This robust testing underscores the versatility and resilience of simpleKT vis-a-vis both question-contextualized and isolated KC information scenarios.

Addressing Challenges

The paper implies that excessive model complexity in KT might not necessarily correlate with improved outcomes. The avoidance of complexity in simpleKT indicates a paradigm shift where simplifying the architecture can maintain, or even enhance, performance. This is particularly relevant when dealing with domains where computational resources are constrained or simplicity in model deployment is preferred.

Moreover, the detailed ablation studies underline the relevance of the model's components, specifically the role of incorporating explicit question difficulty modeling. These studies reiterate the power of leveraging simple, interpretable methodologies instead of convoluted neural mechanisms.

Future Directions

This paper's contribution has significant implications for future KT research. By positing simpleKT as a robust baseline, it sets a benchmark for future models to surpass, encouraging researchers to delve further into efficient model design. Future research may benefit from exploring extensions of simpleKT in adaptive learning systems or employable in real-time educational settings.

The accessibility of the code and datasets, provided alongside the research, is commendable, fostering reproducibility and facilitating broader engagement from the AI education research community. As KT evolves, simpleKT stands as a pivotal reference point in driving forward discussions on the balance between complexity and efficacy in artificial intelligence applications in education.