Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ensuring reliability: what is the optimal time for power plant maintenance in Texas as the climate changes? (2302.00185v4)

Published 1 Feb 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: We analyzed data for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) to assess shoulder seasons -- that is, the 45 days of lowest total energy use and peak demand in the spring and fall typically used for power plant maintenance -- and whether their occurrence has changed over time. Over the period 1996--2022, the shoulder seasons never started earlier than late March nor later than mid-October, corresponding well with the minimum of total degree days. In the temperature record 1959--2022, the minimum in degree days in the spring moved earlier, from early March to early February, and in the fall moved later, from early to mid-November. Warming temperatures might cause these minima in degree days to merge into a single annual minimum in December or January by the mid-2040s, a time when there is a non-trivial risk of 1-day record energy use and peak demand from winter storms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (64)
  1. Climate change impacts on electricity demand in the state of new south wales, australia. Applied Energy 98, 376–383. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.059.
  2. Assessing climate sensitivity of peak electricity load for resilient power systems planning and operation: A study applied to the Texas region. Energy 185, 1143–1153. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.074.
  3. Power play: A more reliable U.S. electric system. Issues in Science and Technology 22, 51–58.
  4. Climate change is projected to have severe impacts on the frequency and intensity of peak electricity demand across the united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 1886–1891. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613193114.
  5. Impacts of climate change on electric power supply in the western united states. Nature Climate Change 5, 748–752. doi:10.1038/nclimate2648.
  6. Forecasting peak electricity demand for los angeles considering higher air temperatures due to climate change. Applied Energy 236, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.039.
  7. Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in texas. Energy Research & Social Science 77, 102106. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102106.
  8. Electricity load dynamics, temperature and seasonality nexus in algeria. Energy 200, 117513. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117513.
  9. The impact of climate change on new zealand’s electricity demand, in: 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, pp. 808–813. doi:10.1109/PMAPS.2010.5528429.
  10. CIESIN, 2020. Gridded population of the world, version 4 (gpwv4): Population count. https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4.
  11. Thermal power generation in disadvantaged in a warming world. Environmental Research Letters 16, 024043. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a8.
  12. Climate warming causes intensification of the hydrological cycle, resulting in changes to the vernal and autumnal windows in a northern temperate forest. Hydrological Processes 15, 3519–3534. doi:10.1002/hyp.10450.
  13. Biologically-Relevant Trends in Springtime Temperatures Across the United States. Geophysical Research Letters 46, 12377–12387. doi:10.1029/2019GL085251.
  14. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, 2022a. Ercot’s use of energy conservation. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2021/08/04/Energy_Conservation_7-13-2022.pdf.
  15. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, 2022b. Methodology for calculating maximum daily resource planned outage capacity. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Austin, TX.
  16. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, 2023. Report on the capacity, demand and reserves (cdr) in the ercot region, 2024-2033. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Austin, TX.
  17. The impact of climate change on electricity demand in australia. Energy & Environment 29, 1263–1297. doi:10.1177/0958305X18776538.
  18. ERCOT Board, 2022. April 28, 2022 board report: Nprr 1108, ercot shall approve or deny all resource outage requests. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2022/05/02/1108NPRR-37%20Board%20Report%20042822.docx.
  19. Impacts of climate change on electricity demand in china: An empirical estimation based on panel data. Energy 170, 880–888. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.044.
  20. Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 251, 695–706. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.045.
  21. Impact of climate change on spanish electricy demand. Climatic Change 165, 50. doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03086-0.
  22. Snowmelt control on spring hydrology declines as the vernal window lengthens. Environmental Research Letters 15, 114040. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abbd00.
  23. Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the pacific northwest and washington state. Climatic Change 102. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9857-y.
  24. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146, 1999–2049.
  25. The effects of climate change on interregional electricity market dynamics on the u.s. west coast. Earth’s Future 9, e2021EF002400. doi:10.1029/2021EF002400.
  26. Asymmetric expansion of summer season on may and september in korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Science 57, 619–627. doi:10.1007/s13143-020-00220-3.
  27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. URL: https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6/wg2/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FullReport.pdf, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.
  28. Joint Commenters I, 2022. April 15, 2022 comments on nprr 1108, ercot shall approve or deny all resource outage requests. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2022/04/15/1108NPRR-27%20Joint%20Commenters%20I%20Comments%20041522.docx.
  29. The impact of neglecting climate change and variability on ercot’s forecasts of electricity demand in texas. Weather, Climate, and Society 14, 499–505. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0140.1.
  30. A quantification of how much crypto-miners are driving up the wholesale cost of energy in texas. arXiv:2302.02221.
  31. Phenology of the avian spring migratory passage in europe and north america: Asymmetric advancement in time and increase in duration. Ecological Indicators 101, 985–991. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.083.
  32. ERCOT West Texas load study: Estimate the electric load impacts of oil and gas related activities. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2022/06/10/ERCOT_West_Texas_Load_Study_Report.pdf.
  33. Climate change projections for the Texas High Plains and Rolling Plains. Theoretical and Appled Climatology 129, 263–280. doi:10.1007/s00704-016-1773-2.
  34. How to know the difference between a local power outage and rolling blackouts. The Texas Tribune .
  35. Assessment of Historic and Future Trends of Extreme Weather in Texas, 1900-2036: 2021 Update. Technical Report OSC-202101. Office of the State Climatologist, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  36. Breaking down the Texas winter blackouts: what went wrong? Technical Report. Wood Mackenzie.
  37. Analyzing the impact of climate change on future electricity demand in thailand. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23, 1441–1448. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922254.
  38. Multidecadal variability of the summer length in europe. Journal of Climate 28, 5375–5388. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00429.1.
  39. Heating degree day data applied to residential heating energy consumption. Journal of Applied Metereology 19, 241–246. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019<0241:HDDDAT>2.0.CO;2.
  40. Using energy audits to investigate the impacts of common air-conditioning design and installation issues on peak power demand and energy consumption in Austin, Texas. Energy and Buildings 43, 3271–3278. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.032.
  41. Re: Nprr 1108 passed by ercot board. https://competitivepower.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/TCPA-letter-Re-Appeal-Process-and-NPRR-1108-Final.pdf.
  42. Approval of Methodology for Calculating Maximum Daily Resource Planned Outage Capacity – ERCOT Recommendation. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2022/06/13/11.1%20ERCOT%20Recommendation.pdf.
  43. Ubiquity of human-induced changes in climate variability. Earth System Dynamics 12, 1393–1411. doi:10.5194/esd-12-1393-2021.
  44. Heterogeneous climate change impacts on electricity demand in world cities circa mid-century. Scientific Reports 12, 4280. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07922-w.
  45. Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nature Communications 10, 2762. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10399-3.
  46. April 21, 2022 tac advocate position statement on nprr 1108, ercot shall approve or deny all resource outage requests. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2022/04/21/1108NPRR-35%20TAC%20Advocate%20Position%20Statement%20042122.docx.
  47. Estimating impacts of warming temperatures on california’s electricity system. Global Environmental Change 23, 499–511. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.005.
  48. Onset of spring starting earlier across the northern hemisphere. Global Change Biology 12, 343–351. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01097.x.
  49. Changing sensitivity to cold weather in Texas power demand. iScience 25, 104173. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104173.
  50. Birds advancing lay dates with warming springs face greater risk of chick mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 25590–25594. doi:10.1073/pnas.2009864117.
  51. Perspectives on peak demand: How is ERCOT peak electric load evolving in the context of changing weather and heating electrification? The Electricity Journal 36, 107254. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2023.107254.
  52. Population-weighted heating degree-days for Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean 19, 261–268. doi:10.1080/07055900.1981.9649113.
  53. Texas Water Development Board, 2022. 2022 state water plan: Water for texas. Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
  54. Is spring starting earlier? The Holocene 18, 95–104. doi:10.1177/0959683607085599.
  55. Climate change and electricity demand in brazil: A stochastic approach. Energy 102, 596–604. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.120.
  56. U.S. Census Bureau, 2021. Quickfacts: Texas. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/TX.
  57. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020. Today in energy: Wind is a growing part of the electricity mix in texas. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45476.
  58. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2021. State electricity profiles. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/.
  59. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2022. State energy profiles. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=TX.
  60. Vulnerability of us and european electricity supply to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2, 676–681. doi:10.1038/nclimate1546.
  61. Electrification of Heating in the Texas Residential Sector. Technical Report. IdeaSmiths, LLC.
  62. Quantifying the impact of residential space heating electrification on the texas electric grid. Applied Energy 298, 117113. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117113.
  63. Energy supply, delivery, and demand, in: Reidmiller, D., Avery, C., Easterling, D., Kunkel, K., Lewis, K., Maycock, T., Stewart, B. (Eds.), Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C.. volume II, pp. 174–201. doi:10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH4.
  64. Time-varying trends in frost indicators in the U.S. Southern Great Plains. International Journal of Climatology 41, 1264–1278. doi:10.1002/joc.6803.

Summary

  • The paper finds that Texas power grid shoulder seasons, typically optimal for maintenance, are shifting due to climate change, potentially converging into a single period by the mid-2040s.
  • Analyzing historical temperature and electricity data from 1996 to 2022, the study reveals that spring shoulder seasons are advancing and fall ones are retreating.
  • These climate-induced shifts increase the risk of energy supply-demand mismatches and underscore the need for adaptive maintenance planning that incorporates climate forecasts to enhance grid resilience.

Optimal Timing for Power Plant Maintenance in Texas Amidst Climate Change

The paper explores the pressing issue of determining optimal periods for power plant maintenance within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), considering evolving climate conditions. The paper meticulously examines temperature and electricity demand patterns from 1996 to 2022 to ascertain changes in Texas’s shoulder seasons—periods typically harnessed for plant maintenance due to minimal energy demand.

Key Findings and Methodology

The authors utilize historical data, analyzing it through metrics like daily electricity use, peak demand, and heating and cooling degree days. Their analysis reveals that traditionally identified shoulder seasons in spring and fall have started to shift due to changing climate conditions. Specifically, the spring shoulder season is advancing earlier by approximately 2.4 days per decade, while the fall season is retreating later by about 1.1 days per decade. This change is predicated on an expansive temperature record from 1959 to 2022. The authors emphasize that these shifts could converge into a single shoulder period in December or January by the mid-2040s.

Through correlative analysis, the authors also establish a strong relationship between temperature minima and electricity demand, with the former potentially serving as a predictive measure for the latter. This suggests that temperature data could be effectively leveraged for strategic planning in power plant maintenance, although ERCOT does not currently incorporate long-term climate forecasts in their demand projections.

Implications

The paper underscores the implications of advancing climate change on the power sector, particularly the challenge of maintenance scheduling against the backdrop of more frequent and severe weather incidents. The changing temporal envelope of shoulder seasons indicates potential gaps in reliability if maintenance scheduling does not adapt to these climate-induced shifts. As a practical implication, there is a heightened risk of energy supply-demand mismatches during these future shoulder periods—the confluence of weather unpredictability and increased demand peaks could strain grid stability.

Theoretical and Practical Speculations

Theoretically, this paper presents a significant case for incorporating climatic considerations more robustly into grid management practices. Practically, it suggests a need for ERCOT and similar entities worldwide to evolve their operational strategies, integrating climate predictions into routine maintenance planning and forecasting models to preemptively address shifts in demand and enhance grid resilience.

Future Developments in AI and Energy Management

Looking forward, the integration of AI into climate and demand forecasting could revolutionize the predictability and management of energy resources. AI systems could digest a multitude of climatic and demand factors in real-time to optimize maintenance schedules dynamically. Coupling predictive AI models with climate data can furnish grid operators with precision tools for mitigating risks associated with compressed or merged shoulder seasons.

In conclusion, this paper reinforces the need for adaptive energy management strategies in response to climate evolution, advocating for a progressive shift in planning frameworks that foresee and incorporate seasonal and climactic variability. This anticipated confluence of factors marks a pivotal consideration for resilient and reliable energy delivery systems in the coming decades.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown