Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Simple diffusion: End-to-end diffusion for high resolution images (2301.11093v2)

Published 26 Jan 2023 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: Currently, applying diffusion models in pixel space of high resolution images is difficult. Instead, existing approaches focus on diffusion in lower dimensional spaces (latent diffusion), or have multiple super-resolution levels of generation referred to as cascades. The downside is that these approaches add additional complexity to the diffusion framework. This paper aims to improve denoising diffusion for high resolution images while keeping the model as simple as possible. The paper is centered around the research question: How can one train a standard denoising diffusion models on high resolution images, and still obtain performance comparable to these alternate approaches? The four main findings are: 1) the noise schedule should be adjusted for high resolution images, 2) It is sufficient to scale only a particular part of the architecture, 3) dropout should be added at specific locations in the architecture, and 4) downsampling is an effective strategy to avoid high resolution feature maps. Combining these simple yet effective techniques, we achieve state-of-the-art on image generation among diffusion models without sampling modifiers on ImageNet.

An Expert Overview of "Simple Diffusion: End-to-End Diffusion for High Resolution Images"

This paper presents a comprehensive examination of the use of diffusion models in generating high-resolution images, specifically targeting simplification without sacrificing performance. Diffusion models have demonstrated exceptional effectiveness across various data generation tasks including images, audio, and video. However, their application to high-resolution images has been traditionally complicated by the necessity of operating in latent spaces or using multi-stage generation processes.

Key Contributions

The authors propose notable modifications to standard denoising diffusion models, resulting in an approach termed "simple diffusion," which accommodates high-resolution image generation with comparable efficacy to more complex methods. The central contributions consist of:

  1. Adjusted Noise Schedules: The paper introduces tailored noise schedules that accommodate the requirements of higher resolutions. The traditional cosine schedule is shifted to maintain a stable signal-to-noise ratio across resolution scales, allowing the diffusion model to address the reconstruction of both global and local structures effectively.
  2. Architecture Scaling Strategy: The research demonstrates that scaling the architecture is feasible by primarily focusing on a specific resolution within the architecture—specifically the 16×1616 \times 16 block of a U-Net model. This strategy reduces memory usage and computational demands while maintaining high performance.
  3. Dropout and Downsampling Techniques: The application of dropout is refined, emphasizing its use predominantly in lower-resolution model layers. High-resolution feature maps are handled through downsampling techniques such as Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) or conventional convolutions to optimize for both efficiency and effectiveness.
  4. Multiscale Loss Function: An innovative multiscale training loss is developed, enhancing convergence by incorporating loss calculations from downsampled resolutions with weighted importance. This addresses the challenge of overfitting high-frequency details without substantial computational overhead.

Empirical Results

The application of these strategies yields state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet image generation tasks without the employment of sampling modifications like classifier-free guidance or rejection sampling. Specifically, the models achieve competitive FID and IS scores at resolutions up to 512 ×\times 512. By minimizing complexity, the authors manage to streamline diffusion processing, while still aligning with the visual quality observed in more elaborate setups such as cascaded generation frameworks.

Implications and Future Directions

The contributions of this research simplify the training and usage of diffusion models in high-resolution contexts. This has substantial implications for practical applications where resource constraints exist or when rapid prototyping is essential. Additionally, the successful adaptation of the simple diffusion framework to text-to-image generation tasks, achieving competitive FID scores on COCO benchmark, showcases its versatility.

Looking forward, future research may capitalize on these findings to further extend diffusion models into domains like video generation or other modalities requiring high-resolution outputs. Furthermore, deeper investigation into adaptive noise schedules across varying data types and densities is warranted as a means of strengthening the generalization of this approach.

In conclusion, this paper makes significant strides in balancing simplicity with performance in the domain of high-resolution image synthesis using diffusion models. The results underscore the potential for further advances in generative modeling driven by streamlined operational methodologies.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Anonymous. Discrete predictor-corrector diffusion models for image synthesis. In Submitted to The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=VM8batVBWvg. under review.
  2. ediff-i: Text-to-image diffusion models with an ensemble of expert denoisers. CoRR, abs/2211.01324, 2022.
  3. Maskgit: Masked generative image transformer. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pp. 11305–11315. IEEE, 2022.
  4. Muse: Text-to-image generation via masked generative transformers. CoRR, abs/2301.00704, 2023.
  5. WaveGrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00713, 2020.
  6. Chen, T. On the importance of noise scheduling for diffusion models. arxiv, 2023.
  7. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. CoRR, abs/2105.05233, 2021.
  8. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021.
  9. Ernie-vilg 2.0: Improving text-to-image diffusion model with knowledge-enhanced mixture-of-denoising-experts. CoRR, abs/2210.15257, 2022.
  10. f-dm: A multi-stage diffusion model via progressive signal transformation. CoRR, abs/2210.04955, 2022.
  11. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. CoRR, abs/2207.12598, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2207.12598. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.12598.
  12. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS, 2020.
  13. Cascaded diffusion models for high fidelity image generation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 23:47:1–47:33, 2022.
  14. Scalable adaptive computation for iterative generation. CoRR, abs/2212.11972, 2022.
  15. Variational diffusion models. CoRR, abs/2107.00630, 2021.
  16. DiffWave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2021.
  17. On distillation of guided diffusion models. CoRR, abs/2210.03142, 2022.
  18. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Meila, M. and Zhang, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, 2021.
  19. GLIDE: towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. In Chaudhuri, K., Jegelka, S., Song, L., Szepesvári, C., Niu, G., and Sabato, S. (eds.), International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp.  16784–16804. PMLR, 2022. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/nichol22a.html.
  20. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. CoRR, abs/2212.09748, 2022.
  21. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21:140:1–140:67, 2020.
  22. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. CoRR, abs/2204.06125, 2022.
  23. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pp. 10674–10685. IEEE, 2022.
  24. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. CoRR, abs/2205.11487, 2022.
  25. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR. OpenReview.net, 2022.
  26. Stylegan-xl: Scaling stylegan to large diverse datasets. In Nandigjav, M., Mitra, N. J., and Hertzmann, A. (eds.), SIGGRAPH ’22: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference, pp.  49:1–49:10. ACM, 2022.
  27. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. CoRR, abs/2209.14792, 2022.
  28. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In Bach, F. R. and Blei, D. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, 2015.
  29. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS, 2019.
  30. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021.
  31. Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation. CoRR, abs/2206.10789, 2022.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Emiel Hoogeboom (26 papers)
  2. Jonathan Heek (13 papers)
  3. Tim Salimans (46 papers)
Citations (191)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com