Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Approximate orthogonality, Bourgain's pinned distance theorem and exponential frames (2301.09144v1)

Published 22 Jan 2023 in math.CA

Abstract: Let $A$ be a countable and discrete subset of ${\Bbb R}d$, $d \ge 2$, of positive upper Beurling density. Let $K$ denote a bounded symmetric convex set with a smooth boundary and everywhere non-vanishing Gaussian curvature. It is known that ${\mathcal E}(A)={e{2 \pi i x \cdot a}}{a \in A}$ cannot serve as an orthogonal basis for $L2(K)$ \cite{IKT01}. In this paper, we prove that even approximate average orthogonality is an obstacle to the existence of an exponential frame in the following sense. Let $A$ be as above and $\phi \ge 0$ be a continuous monotonically nonincreasing function on $[0, \infty)$ such that the approximate orthogonality condition holds \begin{align}\notag {\left( \frac{1}{2j} \int{2j}{2{j+1}} \phip(t) dt \right)}{1/p} \leq c_j 2{-j\frac{d+1}{2}} \quad \text{and} \quad |\widehat{\chi}K(a-a')| \leq \phi(\rho*(a-a')) \ \forall a \not=a , a,a' \in A, \end{align} where $\rho*$ is the Minkowski functional on $K*$, the dual body of $K$. Then, if $$\limsup{j \to \infty} c_j=0,$$ then the upper density of $A$ is equal to $0$, hence ${\mathcal E}(A)$ is not a frame for $L2(K)$. The case $p=\infty$ was previously established by the authors of this paper in \cite{IM2020}. The point is that if ${\mathcal E}(A)$ is a frame for $L2(K)$, then very few pairs of distinct exponentials $e{2 \pi i x.a}, e{2 \pi i x.a'}$ from ${\mathcal E}(A)$ come anywhere near being orthogonal. Our proof uses a generalization of Bourgain's result on pinned distances determined by sets of positive Lebesgue upper density in ${\Bbb R}d$, $d \ge 2$. We also improve the $L{\infty}$ version of this result originally established in \cite{IM2020}. By using an extension of the combinatorial idea from \cite{IR03}, we prove that under the $L{\infty}$ hypothesis, $A$ is finite if $d \not=1 \mod 4$. If $d=1$ mod $4, A$ may be infinite, but if it is, then it must be a subset of a line.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.