Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports (2212.14882v1)

Published 30 Dec 2022 in cs.CL and cs.LG
ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports

Abstract: The release of ChatGPT, a LLM capable of generating text that appears human-like and authentic, has gained significant attention beyond the research community. We expect that the convincing performance of ChatGPT incentivizes users to apply it to a variety of downstream tasks, including prompting the model to simplify their own medical reports. To investigate this phenomenon, we conducted an exploratory case study. In a questionnaire, we asked 15 radiologists to assess the quality of radiology reports simplified by ChatGPT. Most radiologists agreed that the simplified reports were factually correct, complete, and not potentially harmful to the patient. Nevertheless, instances of incorrect statements, missed key medical findings, and potentially harmful passages were reported. While further studies are needed, the initial insights of this study indicate a great potential in using LLMs like ChatGPT to improve patient-centered care in radiology and other medical domains.

An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports by ChatGPT

The academic paper titled "ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports" investigates the applicability of the LLM, ChatGPT, in simplifying complex medical texts, specifically radiology reports, for a non-expert audience. With the emergence of ChatGPT, powered by the advancements in LLMs, there is a growing anticipation for their use in diverse fields, including medicine, to enhance the accessibility of specialized knowledge.

Methodology and Findings

The authors conducted an exploratory case paper wherein they presented radiologists with original and ChatGPT-simplified radiology reports. These reports pertained to fictitious clinical scenarios designed to reflect moderate complexity found in clinical practice. Fifteen radiologists participated, evaluating the simplified reports based on factual correctness, completeness, and potential harm.

Key numerical findings include:

  • The simplified reports were generally rated as factually correct (median rating of 2), suggesting confidence in the basic accuracy of ChatGPT's text transformation capability.
  • Completeness was valued slightly higher than factual correctness, indicating the model's ability to retain key information while reducing complexity.
  • Importantly, the potential for harm through patient misinterpretation was deemed low (median rating of 4), suggesting that, although simplification ineffectively eliminates complexity completely, it remains within safe bounds.

Analysis of Simplification

Despite overall positive evaluations, the paper highlights specific areas of concern. The simplified reports occasionally presented inaccuracies due to the misinterpretation of medical terms, use of imprecise language, hallucinations (introducing non-existent information), and unsatisfactory localization of described conditions. These issues underline the limitations in current LLM deployments, manifesting the challenge of maintaining intricate detail and precision essential in the medical field.

Implications

The positive feedback regarding the model's capacity to simplify radiology reports presents significant implications. If capable of refinement, ChatGPT-like LLMs could become integral to patient care, empowering patients to comprehend their medical information more autonomously, thereby fostering patient-centered care. This simplification could be particularly beneficial where language or medical literacy barriers exist.

However, it is paramount to recognize the limitations and associated risks. The potential misinterpretations could lead to detrimental patient outcomes if users mistakenly or prematurely act on simplified information without appropriate medical guidance. Thus, the authors advocate for continued expert oversight and the need for developing domain-specific iterations of LLMs.

Future Directions

This research opens several avenues for further exploration. Firstly, addressing the exemplified limitations could involve fine-tuning LLMs with medical data, potentially through reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) specific to the medical domain. Furthermore, integrating these models into clinical workflows, where automated simplifications are validated by medical professionals before being presented to patients, could harness their potential while mitigating risks.

In conclusion, this paper provides foundational insight into using LLMs for medical text simplification. While these preliminary findings endorse the concept's viability, they also emphasize the necessity for cautious implementation complemented by continuous expert input to ensure safety and efficacy in medical settings.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Katharina Jeblick (1 paper)
  2. Balthasar Schachtner (4 papers)
  3. Jakob Dexl (5 papers)
  4. Andreas Mittermeier (2 papers)
  5. Anna Theresa Stüber (1 paper)
  6. Johanna Topalis (1 paper)
  7. Tobias Weber (29 papers)
  8. Philipp Wesp (1 paper)
  9. Bastian Sabel (5 papers)
  10. Jens Ricke (2 papers)
  11. Michael Ingrisch (14 papers)
Citations (317)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com