Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Diffusion Probabilistic Models beat GANs on Medical Images (2212.07501v1)

Published 14 Dec 2022 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: The success of Deep Learning applications critically depends on the quality and scale of the underlying training data. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate arbitrary large datasets, but diversity and fidelity are limited, which has recently been addressed by denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) whose superiority has been demonstrated on natural images. In this study, we propose Medfusion, a conditional latent DDPM for medical images. We compare our DDPM-based model against GAN-based models, which constitute the current state-of-the-art in the medical domain. Medfusion was trained and compared with (i) StyleGan-3 on n=101,442 images from the AIROGS challenge dataset to generate fundoscopies with and without glaucoma, (ii) ProGAN on n=191,027 from the CheXpert dataset to generate radiographs with and without cardiomegaly and (iii) wGAN on n=19,557 images from the CRCMS dataset to generate histopathological images with and without microsatellite stability. In the AIROGS, CRMCS, and CheXpert datasets, Medfusion achieved lower (=better) FID than the GANs (11.63 versus 20.43, 30.03 versus 49.26, and 17.28 versus 84.31). Also, fidelity (precision) and diversity (recall) were higher (=better) for Medfusion in all three datasets. Our study shows that DDPM are a superior alternative to GANs for image synthesis in the medical domain.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Gustav Müller-Franzes (8 papers)
  2. Jan Moritz Niehues (3 papers)
  3. Firas Khader (17 papers)
  4. Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh (23 papers)
  5. Christoph Haarburger (9 papers)
  6. Christiane Kuhl (22 papers)
  7. Tianci Wang (3 papers)
  8. Tianyu Han (20 papers)
  9. Sven Nebelung (23 papers)
  10. Jakob Nikolas Kather (34 papers)
  11. Daniel Truhn (51 papers)
Citations (57)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.