Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Editing Models with Task Arithmetic (2212.04089v3)

Published 8 Dec 2022 in cs.LG, cs.CL, and cs.CV

Abstract: Changing how pre-trained models behave -- e.g., improving their performance on a downstream task or mitigating biases learned during pre-training -- is a common practice when developing machine learning systems. In this work, we propose a new paradigm for steering the behavior of neural networks, centered around \textit{task vectors}. A task vector specifies a direction in the weight space of a pre-trained model, such that movement in that direction improves performance on the task. We build task vectors by subtracting the weights of a pre-trained model from the weights of the same model after fine-tuning on a task. We show that these task vectors can be modified and combined together through arithmetic operations such as negation and addition, and the behavior of the resulting model is steered accordingly. Negating a task vector decreases performance on the target task, with little change in model behavior on control tasks. Moreover, adding task vectors together can improve performance on multiple tasks at once. Finally, when tasks are linked by an analogy relationship of the form ``A is to B as C is to D", combining task vectors from three of the tasks can improve performance on the fourth, even when no data from the fourth task is used for training. Overall, our experiments with several models, modalities and tasks show that task arithmetic is a simple, efficient and effective way of editing models.

Editing Models with Task Arithmetic: An Analytical Overview

The paper "Editing Models with Task Arithmetic" introduces a novel paradigm for modifying the behavior of pre-trained neural networks through the application of task vectors. This method offers an innovative approach to adjust machine learning models post pre-training by either enhancing performance on specific downstream tasks or reducing unwanted behaviors without extensive retraining. This paper presents compelling evidence that task vectors can serve as efficient tools for managing model properties, thereby expanding the capacity for modular and adaptive improvements in AI systems.

Conceptual Foundation

The central idea of this work revolves around the identification and application of task vectors, which are derived by calculating the difference between the weights of a fine-tuned model and its corresponding pre-trained version. This subtraction results in a vector that frames the model's modifications needed to perform well on a given task. The strength of task vectors lies in their composability—leveraging basic arithmetic operations such as negation and addition to modify model characteristics in a controlled manner.

Key Findings and Methodological Insights

  1. Task Arithmetic Operations:
    • Negation: By applying the negation of a task vector to a model, the paper demonstrates the capacity to downscale performance on specific tasks. For instance, negating a finely-tuned vector for a toxic text generation task significantly reduces toxic output in LLMs. Similarly, applying the negation to image classification tasks allowed for forgetting specific learned capabilities while maintaining performance stability on control tasks.
  • Addition: The addition of task vectors from different tasks results in collaborative models that can excel in multiple domains simultaneously. The paper illustrates that such aggregated task vectors lead to robust multi-task models without requiring structural changes or retraining. This capability represents a substantial advantage in computational efficiency, particularly when handling a wide variety of tasks concurrently.
  • Task Analogies: The paper explores scenarios where tasks can be linked through analogies—improving generalization to new tasks without training on them directly, e.g., enhancing sentiment analysis capabilities across domain boundaries by constructing task analogy vectors.
  1. Empirical Evaluation:
    • The authors present thorough experimental validation demonstrating the efficacy and efficiency of task vectors across several vision and NLP tasks, showcasing improvements in model adaptability and transferability while maintaining computational economy. Strong numerical results highlight the approach's potential, such as achieving significant reductions in toxicity and improvements in multi-task learning performance.
  2. Scalability and Modularity:
    • The paper discusses how task vectors can be efficiently stored and combined, aligning well with the modular and reusable nature of modern neural architectures. This modularity facilitates rapid experimentation on diverse tasks without reiterating the entire fine-tuning process.

Implications and Speculations

The task arithmetic framework potentially signifies a shift in how model updates and edits are conceptualized within the AI community. This approach provides a highly flexible and computationally lightweight means to control model features, paving the way for more dynamic deployment strategies in AI applications. It allows practitioners to maintain a library of task vectors that offer quick adaptability to unforeseen challenges or incremental task requirements without incurring substantial computational overhead.

Conclusion and Future Directions

This work sets the groundwork for further exploration into the mathematical properties and potential of task vectors. Future research could delve into optimizing task vector geometric properties to enhance performance outcomes or explore the possibility of applying this paradigm to more complex model architectures and wider domains. Moreover, investigating the broader theoretical implications of task arithmetic could unveil new insights into model interpretability and the fundamental principles governing neural network behavior across diverse settings. The paper presents a versatile framework that could redefine how models are adapted and scaled in the ever-evolving landscape of AI technologies.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Gabriel Ilharco (26 papers)
  2. Marco Tulio Ribeiro (20 papers)
  3. Mitchell Wortsman (29 papers)
  4. Suchin Gururangan (29 papers)
  5. Ludwig Schmidt (80 papers)
  6. Hannaneh Hajishirzi (176 papers)
  7. Ali Farhadi (138 papers)
Citations (312)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

HackerNews