Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SpaText: Spatio-Textual Representation for Controllable Image Generation (2211.14305v2)

Published 25 Nov 2022 in cs.CV, cs.GR, and cs.LG

Abstract: Recent text-to-image diffusion models are able to generate convincing results of unprecedented quality. However, it is nearly impossible to control the shapes of different regions/objects or their layout in a fine-grained fashion. Previous attempts to provide such controls were hindered by their reliance on a fixed set of labels. To this end, we present SpaText - a new method for text-to-image generation using open-vocabulary scene control. In addition to a global text prompt that describes the entire scene, the user provides a segmentation map where each region of interest is annotated by a free-form natural language description. Due to lack of large-scale datasets that have a detailed textual description for each region in the image, we choose to leverage the current large-scale text-to-image datasets and base our approach on a novel CLIP-based spatio-textual representation, and show its effectiveness on two state-of-the-art diffusion models: pixel-based and latent-based. In addition, we show how to extend the classifier-free guidance method in diffusion models to the multi-conditional case and present an alternative accelerated inference algorithm. Finally, we offer several automatic evaluation metrics and use them, in addition to FID scores and a user study, to evaluate our method and show that it achieves state-of-the-art results on image generation with free-form textual scene control.

An Overview of SpaText: Enhancing Control in Text-to-Image Generation

The paper "SpaText: Spatio-Textual Representation for Controllable Image Generation" introduces a novel approach to text-to-image generation, focusing on enhancing user control over the spatial layout and characteristics of the generated image. The authors highlight limitations present in existing state-of-the-art text-to-image models, primarily their inability to precisely control the shapes and layouts of different objects in the generated images. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing SpaText, a method that integrates open-vocabulary scene control to improve the precision and expressivity of generated images.

Technical Approach

The paper delineates SpaText as a robust method for achieving fine-grained control in text-to-image generation. It does so by utilizing a spatio-textual representation, which involves two main components: a global text prompt describing the entire scene and a segmentation map with each region annotated using free-form text descriptions. Previous models, such as Make-A-Scene, suffered due to reliance on fixed labels for scene segments, which posed significant limitations on the quality and variety of generated images.

To circumvent the requirement for labeled datasets with detailed annotations, the authors leverage existing large-scale text-to-image datasets, deploying a novel CLIP-based spatio-textual representation. This representation facilitates the mapping between spatial information in images and corresponding text descriptions, enabling users to exert detailed control over specific image regions. Furthermore, SpaText employs advanced diffusion models, extending their classifier-free guidance method to efficiently handle multi-conditional inputs. This is achieved by adapting the traditional guidance to support multiple, simultaneous conditions, which enhances the model's flexibility and control fidelity.

Model Implementation and Evaluation

The authors implement SpaText within two diffusion model frameworks: pixel-based and latent-based. Their results show that SpaText can integrate with these models seamlessly, using evaluation metrics such as FID scores, automatic evaluation metrics, and user studies. Notably, SpaText achieves improved outcomes over state-of-the-art methods, underscoring the paper's claim of better fulfiLLMent of both global and local textual inputs.

The evaluation methods included innovative metrics that assess global distance, local distance, and shape compliance (IOU) between the expected and generated images. These metrics indicate a significant enhancement in Spatext's ability to map complex, multi-segment input representations to coherent, contextually correct images.

Challenges and Implications

The research outlines certain limitations of the proposed method, such as instances of characteristic leakage between segments and neglect of very minute segments which could affect finer details of some generation tasks. These challenges hint at areas for further refinement and research, possibly involving improved segmentation techniques or enhanced tuning of the underlying representation conversion processes.

In practical terms, Spatext opens avenues for more intuitive and precise user control in text-based image generation tasks. The implications of such control are manifold, crossing numerous domains including digital art, marketing, and any field requiring the synthesis of complex visual content from descriptive text inputs.

Conclusion

In summary, the SpaText methodology represents a noteworthy advancement in the text-to-image generation landscape, emphasizing the need for user-centered, highly controllable generation processes. By adhering to precise spatio-textual associations and extending diffusion model capabilities to handle multiple conditions, SpaText addresses notable barriers in prior methodologies. Future work may focus on addressing the outlined limitations and exploring additional application domains that can benefit from improved text-to-image generation. The proposed approach thus signals a significant step forward in the ongoing development of sophisticated, user-friendly AI-driven content creation technologies.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Omri Avrahami (12 papers)
  2. Thomas Hayes (9 papers)
  3. Oran Gafni (14 papers)
  4. Sonal Gupta (26 papers)
  5. Yaniv Taigman (28 papers)
  6. Devi Parikh (129 papers)
  7. Dani Lischinski (56 papers)
  8. Ohad Fried (34 papers)
  9. Xi Yin (88 papers)
Citations (172)