Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Jet radius and momentum splitting fraction with dynamical grooming in heavy-ion collisions (2211.13674v1)

Published 24 Nov 2022 in nucl-th and hep-ph

Abstract: We investigate the medium modifications of momentum splitting fraction and groomed jet radius with both dynamical grooming and soft drop algorithms in heavy-ion collisions. In the calculation, the partonic spectrum of initial hard scattering in p+p collisions is provided by the event generator PYTHIA 8, and the energy loss of fast parton traversing in a hot/dense QCD medium is simulated with the Linear Boltzmann Transport (LBT) model. We predict the normalized distributions of the groomed jet radius $\theta_g$ and momentum splitting fraction $z_g$ with the dynamical grooming algorithm in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV, then compare these quantities in dynamical grooming at $a=0.1$, with that in soft drop at $z_{\mathrm{cut}} = 0.1$ and $\beta = 0$. It is found that the normalized distribution ratios Pb+Pb/p+p with respect to $z_g$ in $z_{\mathrm{cut}} = 0.1$, $\beta = 0$ soft drop case are close to unity and those in $a=0.1$ dynamical grooming case show enhancement at small $z_g$, and Pb+Pb/p+p with respect to $\theta_g$ in the dynamical grooming case demonstrate weaker modification than those in the soft drop counterparts. We further calculate the groomed jet number averaged momentum splitting fraction $\rm \langle z_g \rangle_{jets}$ and averaged groomed jet radius $\rm \langle \theta_g \rangle_{jets}$ in p+p and A+A for both grooming cases in three $p{\rm ch, jet}_{\rm T}$ intervals, and find that the originally generated well balanced groomed jets will become more momentum imbalanced and less jet size narrowing due to jet quenching, and weaker medium modification of $z_g$ and $\theta_g$ in $a =0.1$ dynamical grooming case than in the soft drop counterparts.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.