Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance (2210.11427v1)

Published 20 Oct 2022 in cs.CV
DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance

Abstract: Image generation has recently seen tremendous advances, with diffusion models allowing to synthesize convincing images for a large variety of text prompts. In this article, we propose DiffEdit, a method to take advantage of text-conditioned diffusion models for the task of semantic image editing, where the goal is to edit an image based on a text query. Semantic image editing is an extension of image generation, with the additional constraint that the generated image should be as similar as possible to a given input image. Current editing methods based on diffusion models usually require to provide a mask, making the task much easier by treating it as a conditional inpainting task. In contrast, our main contribution is able to automatically generate a mask highlighting regions of the input image that need to be edited, by contrasting predictions of a diffusion model conditioned on different text prompts. Moreover, we rely on latent inference to preserve content in those regions of interest and show excellent synergies with mask-based diffusion. DiffEdit achieves state-of-the-art editing performance on ImageNet. In addition, we evaluate semantic image editing in more challenging settings, using images from the COCO dataset as well as text-based generated images.

Exploring DiffEdit: Diffusion-Based Semantic Image Editing

The research paper "DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance" presents an innovative approach to semantic image editing utilizing diffusion models. The work leverages the probabilistic capabilities of diffusion models to handle image editing tasks with text-based prompts, offering automated solutions for generating region masks within images.

DiffEdit's primary function is to facilitate semantic image editing by identifying the specific regions of an image that require modification, guided entirely by textual input. The task, as outlined in the paper, incorporates modifications in images, ensuring that they remain as similar as possible to the original inputs while reflecting the changes articulated through text prompts. This balancing act of maintaining image fidelity while achieving semantic alterations distinguishes DiffEdit from other inpainting methods that rely on predefined masks to guide image edits.

The methodology of DiffEdit consists of three crucial steps:

  1. Mask Generation: Unlike conventional techniques that require user-supplied masks, DiffEdit automatically generates mask regions by contrasting noise predictions derived from diffusion models under different textual conditions. This process identifies image areas pertinent to the requested semantic changes.
  2. Encoding: Before editing, DiffEdit encodes the input image to a latent space representation. This encoding step is performed unconditionally to preserve the image's inherent properties during the editing phase.
  3. Mask-Guided Decoding: In this step, the encoded image is decoded with the adjustments dictated by the text prompt. The mask generated in the first step restricts edits to the identified regions, thereby maintaining the image's overall integrity.

The paper presents extensive experimental analyses, evaluating DiffEdit against other notable methods such as SDEdit and ILVR across multiple datasets including ImageNet, COCO, and images generated by Imagen. Key metrics used for these evaluations include LPIPS, CSFID, and FID, which measure perceptual distances and class-conditional realism, respectively. These experiments demonstrate that DiffEdit achieves superior trade-off curves, indicating an effective balance between maintaining image similarity and achieving coherent semantic edits.

The theoretical exploration in the paper, particularly the proposition concerning the DDIM encoder, underlines why DiffEdit outperforms noise-based alternatives such as SDEdit. The authors provide bounds that show how DDIM encoding yields closer statistical expectations between input and output images — a critical feature for semantic editing tasks.

Practical implications of DiffEdit extend across numerous applications where intuitive, text-driven image manipulation is necessary without extensive user training or manual interaction with image details. The implications of this research also stretch toward advancing our understanding of diffusion processes and their application in conditional generation tasks, potentially influencing AI developments in generative adversarial networks (GANs) and similar models.

In summary, the DiffEdit framework proposes a sophisticated melding of diffusion model capabilities with semantic editing requirements, positioning itself as a state-of-the-art solution in the field of text-based image alterations. This paper not only advances the technical boundary of semantic image editing but also sets a precedent for future research to refine and extend diffusion model applications in various AI-driven tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Guillaume Couairon (17 papers)
  2. Jakob Verbeek (59 papers)
  3. Holger Schwenk (35 papers)
  4. Matthieu Cord (129 papers)
Citations (404)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com