Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

When are the natural embeddings of classical invariant rings pure? (2210.09351v3)

Published 17 Oct 2022 in math.AC, math.AG, and math.RT

Abstract: Consider a reductive linear algebraic group $G$ acting linearly on a polynomial ring $S$ over an infinite field; key examples are the general linear group, the symplectic group, the orthogonal group, and the special linear group, with the classical representations as in Weyl's book: for the general linear group, consider a direct sum of copies of the standard representation and copies of the dual; in the other cases take copies of the standard representation. The invariant rings in the respective cases are determinantal rings, rings defined by Pfaffians of alternating matrices, symmetric determinantal rings, and the Pl\"ucker coordinate rings of Grassmannians; these are the classical invariant rings of the title, with $SG\subseteq S$ being the natural embedding. Over a field of characteristic zero, a reductive group is linearly reductive, and it follows that the invariant ring $SG$ is a pure subring of $S$, equivalently, $SG$ is a direct summand of $S$ as an $SG$-module. Over fields of positive characteristic, reductive groups are typically no longer linearly reductive. We determine, in the positive characteristic case, precisely when the inclusion $SG\subseteq S$ is pure. It turns out that if $SG\subseteq S$ is pure, then either the invariant ring $SG$ is regular, or the group $G$ is linearly reductive.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.