Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

s-Club Cluster Vertex Deletion on Interval and Well-Partitioned Chordal Graphs (2210.07699v1)

Published 14 Oct 2022 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and cs.DM

Abstract: In this paper, we study the computational complexity of \textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Vertex Deletion}. Given a graph, \textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Vertex Deletion ($s$-CVD)} aims to delete the minimum number of vertices from the graph so that each connected component of the resulting graph has a diameter at most $s$. When $s=1$, the corresponding problem is popularly known as \sloppy \textsc{Cluster Vertex Deletion (CVD)}. We provide a faster algorithm for \textsc{$s$-CVD} on \emph{interval graphs}. For each $s\geq 1$, we give an $O(n(n+m))$-time algorithm for \textsc{$s$-CVD} on interval graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. In the case of $s=1$, our algorithm is a slight improvement over the $O(n3)$-time algorithm of Cao \etal (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2018) and for $s \geq 2$, it significantly improves the state-of-the-art running time $\left(O\left(n4\right)\right)$. We also give a polynomial-time algorithm to solve \textsc{CVD} on \emph{well-partitioned chordal graphs}, a graph class introduced by Ahn \etal (\textsc{WG 2020}) as a tool for narrowing down complexity gaps for problems that are hard on chordal graphs, and easy on split graphs. Our algorithm relies on a characterisation of the optimal solution and on solving polynomially many instances of the \textsc{Weighted Bipartite Vertex Cover}. This generalises a result of Cao \etal (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2018) on split graphs. We also show that for any even integer $s\geq 2$, \textsc{$s$-CVD} is NP-hard on well-partitioned chordal graphs.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Dibyayan Chakraborty (20 papers)
  2. L. Sunil Chandran (55 papers)
  3. Sajith Padinhatteeri (5 papers)
  4. Raji. R. Pillai (1 paper)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.