Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Towards an Efficient ML System: Unveiling a Trade-off between Task Accuracy and Engineering Efficiency in a Large-scale Car Sharing Platform (2210.06585v1)

Published 10 Oct 2022 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Upon the significant performance of the supervised deep neural networks, conventional procedures of developing ML system are \textit{task-centric}, which aims to maximize the task accuracy. However, we scrutinized this \textit{task-centric} ML system lacks in engineering efficiency when the ML practitioners solve multiple tasks in their domain. To resolve this problem, we propose an \textit{efficiency-centric} ML system that concatenates numerous datasets, classifiers, out-of-distribution detectors, and prediction tables existing in the practitioners' domain into a single ML pipeline. Under various image recognition tasks in the real world car-sharing platform, our study illustrates how we established the proposed system and lessons learned from this journey as follows. First, the proposed ML system accomplishes supreme engineering efficiency while achieving a competitive task accuracy. Moreover, compared to the \textit{task-centric} paradigm, we discovered that the \textit{efficiency-centric} ML system yields satisfactory prediction results on multi-labelable samples, which frequently exist in the real world. We analyze these benefits derived from the representation power, which learned broader label spaces from the concatenated dataset. Last but not least, our study elaborated how we deployed this \textit{efficiency-centric} ML system is deployed in the real world live cloud environment. Based on the proposed analogies, we highly expect that ML practitioners can utilize our study to elevate engineering efficiency in their domain.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Kyung Ho Park (9 papers)
  2. Hyunhee Chung (4 papers)
  3. Soonwoo Kwon (17 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.