Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

CIRCA: comprehensible online system in support of chest X-rays-based COVID-19 diagnosis (2210.05440v1)

Published 11 Oct 2022 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Due to the large accumulation of patients requiring hospitalization, the COVID-19 pandemic disease caused a high overload of health systems, even in developed countries. Deep learning techniques based on medical imaging data can help in the faster detection of COVID-19 cases and monitoring of disease progression. Regardless of the numerous proposed solutions for lung X-rays, none of them is a product that can be used in the clinic. Five different datasets (POLCOVID, AIforCOVID, COVIDx, NIH, and artificially generated data) were used to construct a representative dataset of 23 799 CXRs for model training; 1 050 images were used as a hold-out test set, and 44 247 as independent test set (BIMCV database). A U-Net-based model was developed to identify a clinically relevant region of the CXR. Each image class (normal, pneumonia, and COVID-19) was divided into 3 subtypes using a 2D Gaussian mixture model. A decision tree was used to aggregate predictions from the InceptionV3 network based on processed CXRs and a dense neural network on radiomic features. The lung segmentation model gave the Sorensen-Dice coefficient of 94.86% in the validation dataset, and 93.36% in the testing dataset. In 5-fold cross-validation, the accuracy for all classes ranged from 91% to 93%, keeping slightly higher specificity than sensitivity and NPV than PPV. In the hold-out test set, the balanced accuracy ranged between 68% and 100%. The highest performance was obtained for the subtypes N1, P1, and C1. A similar performance was obtained on the independent dataset for normal and COVID-19 class subtypes. Seventy-six percent of COVID-19 patients wrongly classified as normal cases were annotated by radiologists as with no signs of disease. Finally, we developed the online service (https://circa.aei.polsl.pl) to provide access to fast diagnosis support tools.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (22)
  1. Wojciech Prazuch (4 papers)
  2. Aleksandra Suwalska (4 papers)
  3. Marek Socha (4 papers)
  4. Joanna Tobiasz (3 papers)
  5. Jerzy Jaroszewicz (2 papers)
  6. Katarzyna Gruszczynska (2 papers)
  7. Magdalena Sliwinska (2 papers)
  8. Jerzy Walecki (2 papers)
  9. Tadeusz Popiela (2 papers)
  10. Grzegorz Przybylski (2 papers)
  11. Andrzej Cieszanowski (2 papers)
  12. Mateusz Nowak (6 papers)
  13. Malgorzata Pawlowska (2 papers)
  14. Robert Flisiak (2 papers)
  15. Krzysztof Simon (2 papers)
  16. Gabriela Zapolska (2 papers)
  17. Barbara Gizycka (3 papers)
  18. Edyta Szurowska (5 papers)
  19. POLCOVID Study Group (2 papers)
  20. Michal Marczyk (7 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.