Orthogonal Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Sparsity Constraints
Abstract: This article presents a novel approach to solving the sparsity-constrained Orthogonal Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (SCONMF) problem, which requires decomposing a non-negative data matrix into the product of two lower-rank non-negative matrices, X=WH, where the mixing matrix H has orthogonal rows HHT=I, while also satisfying an upper bound on the number of nonzero elements in each row. By reformulating SCONMF as a capacity-constrained facility-location problem (CCFLP), the proposed method naturally integrates non-negativity, orthogonality, and sparsity constraints. Specifically, our approach integrates control-barrier function (CBF) based framework used for dynamic optimal control design problems with maximum-entropy-principle-based framework used for facility location problems to enforce these constraints while ensuring robust factorization. Additionally, this work introduces a quantitative approach for determining the true" rank of W or H, equivalent to the number oftrue" features - a critical aspect in ONMF applications where the number of features is unknown. Simulations on various datasets demonstrate significantly improved factorizations with low reconstruction errors (as small as by 150 times) while strictly satisfying all constraints, outperforming existing methods that struggle with balancing accuracy and constraint adherence.
- P. Carmona-Saez, R. D. Pascual-Marqui, F. Tirado, J. M. Carazo, and A. Pascual-Montano, “Biclustering of gene expression data by non-smooth non-negative matrix factorization,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2006.
- F. Esposito, N. D. Buono, and L. Selicato, “Nonnegative matrix factorization models for knowledge extraction from biomedical and other real world data,” PAMM, vol. 20, no. 1, jan 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fpamm.202000032
- N. Nadisic, A. Vandaele, J. E. Cohen, and N. Gillis, “Sparse separable nonnegative matrix factorization,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07553
- K. Rose, “Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2210–2239, 1998.
- C. Ding, T. Li, W. Peng, and H. Park, “Orthogonal nonnegative matrix t-factorizations for clustering,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2006, pp. 126–135.
- B. Li, G. Zhou, and A. Cichocki, “Two efficient algorithms for approximately orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 843–846, 2015.
- Z. Yuan and E. Oja, “Projective nonnegative matrix factorization for image compression and feature extraction,” in Image Analysis, H. Kalviainen, J. Parkkinen, and A. Kaarna, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 333–342.
- M. Stražar, M. Žitnik, B. Zupan, J. Ule, and T. Curk, “Orthogonal matrix factorization enables integrative analysis of multiple RNA binding proteins,” Bioinformatics, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1527–1535, Jan. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw003
- Z. Yang and J. Laaksonen, “Multiplicative updates for non-negative projections,” Neurocomputing, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 363–373, 2007, dedicated Hardware Architectures for Intelligent Systems Advances on Neural Networks for Speech and Audio Processing. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231207000318
- S. Choi, “Algorithms for orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization,” 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pp. 1828–1832, 2008.
- M. Charikar and L. Hu, “Approximation algorithms for orthogonal non-negative matrix factorization,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01398
- F. Pompili, N. Gillis, P.-A. Absil, and F. Glineur, “Two algorithms for orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization with application to clustering,” Neurocomputing, vol. 141, pp. 15–25, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231214004068
- J. Kim and H. Park, “Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization for clustering,” Georgia Institute of Technology, Tech. Rep., 2008.
- L. Dong, Y. Yuan, and X. Luxs, “Spectral–spatial joint sparse nmf for hyperspectral unmixing,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2391–2402, 2021.
- R. Peharz and F. Pernkopf, “Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with l0-constraints,” Neurocomputing, vol. 80, pp. 38–46, 2012, special Issue on Machine Learning for Signal Processing 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231211006370
- A. Srivastava, M. Baranwal, and S. Salapaka, “On the persistence of clustering solutions and true number of clusters in a dataset,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, 2019, pp. 5000–5007.
- S. E. Baranzini, P. Mousavi, J. Rio, S. J. Caillier, A. Stillman, P. Villoslada, M. M. Wyatt, M. Comabella, L. D. Greller, R. Somogyi, X. Montalban, and J. R. Oksenberg, “Transcription-based prediction of response to IFNβ𝛽\betaitalic_β using supervised computational methods,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. e2, Dec. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030002
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.