Precise determination of the top-quark on-shell mass $M_t$ via its scale-invariant perturbative relation to the top-quark $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass ${\overline m}_t({\overline m}_t)$ (2209.10777v2)
Abstract: It has been shown that the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a systematic way to solve conventional renormalization scheme and scale ambiguities. The scale-fixed predictions for physical observables using the PMC are independent of the choice of renormalization scheme -- a key requirement of renormalization group invariance. In the paper, we derive new degeneracy relations based on the renormalization group equations that involve both the usual $\beta$-function and the quark mass anomalous dimension $\gamma_m$-function, respectively. These new degeneracy relations lead to an improved PMC scale-setting procedures, such that the correct magnitudes of the strong coupling constant and the $\overline{\rm MS}$-running quark mass can be fixed simultaneously. By using the improved PMC scale-setting procedures, the renormalization scale dependence of the $\overline{\rm MS}$-on-shell quark mass relation can be eliminated systematically. Consequently, the top-quark on-shell (or $\overline{\rm MS}$) mass can be determined without conventional renormalization scale ambiguity. Taking the top-quark $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass ${\overline m}t({\overline m}_t)=162.5{+2.1}{-1.5}$ GeV as the input, we obtain $M_t\simeq 172.41{+2.21}_{-1.57}$ GeV. Here the uncertainties are combined errors with those also from $\Delta \alpha_s(M_Z)$ and the approximate uncertainty stemming from the uncalculated five-loop terms predicted through the Pad\'{e} approximation approach.
- S. J. Brodsky, L. Di Giustino, P. G. Ratcliffe, S. Q. Wang and X. G. Wu, “Comment on P.M. Stevenson, ”‘Maximal conformality’ does not work”, Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138288,” [arXiv:2311.17360 [hep-ph]].
- P. M. Stevenson, “Resolution of the Renormalization Scheme Ambiguity in Perturbative QCD,” Phys. Lett. B 100, 61 (1981).
- P. M. Stevenson, “Optimized Perturbation Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 2916 (1981).
- Y. Ma, X. G. Wu, H. H. Ma and H. Y. Han, “General Properties on Applying the Principle of Minimum Sensitivity to High-order Perturbative QCD Predictions,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 034006 (2015).
- Y. Ma and X. G. Wu, “Renormalization scheme dependence of high-order perturbative QCD predictions,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 036024 (2018).
- L. Di Giustino, S. J. Brodsky, P. G. Ratcliffe, X. G. Wu and S. Q. Wang, “High precision tests of QCD without scale or scheme ambiguities,” [arXiv:2307.03951 [hep-ph]].
- H. Y. Bi, X. G. Wu, Y. Ma, H. H. Ma, S. J. Brodsky and M. Mojaza, “Degeneracy Relations in QCD and the Equivalence of Two Systematic All-Orders Methods for Setting the Renormalization Scale,” Phys. Lett. B 748, 13 (2015).