Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Stakeholder-Centered View on Fairness in Music Recommender Systems (2209.06126v1)

Published 8 Sep 2022 in cs.IR, cs.CY, and cs.HC

Abstract: Our narrative literature review acknowledges that, although there is an increasing interest in recommender system fairness in general, the music domain has received relatively little attention in this regard. However, addressing fairness of music recommender systems (MRSs) is highly important because the performance of these systems considerably impacts both the users of music streaming platforms and the artists providing music to those platforms. The distinct needs that these stakeholder groups may have, and the different aspects of fairness that therefore should be considered, make for a challenging research field with ample opportunities for improvement. The review first outlines current literature on MRS fairness from the perspective of each stakeholder and the stakeholders combined, and then identifies promising directions for future research. The two open questions arising from the review are as follows: (i) In the MRS field, only limited data is publicly available to conduct fairness research; most datasets either originate from the same source or are proprietary (and, thus, not widely accessible). How can we address this limited data availability? (ii) Overall, the review shows that the large majority of works analyze the current situation of MRS fairness, whereas only few works propose approaches to improve it. How can we move forward to a focus on improving fairness aspects in these recommender systems? At FAccTRec '22, we emphasize the specifics of addressing RS fairness in the music domain.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Karlijn Dinnissen (1 paper)
  2. Christine Bauer (14 papers)
Citations (25)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.