Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Gravitational wave source clustering in the luminosity distance space with the presence of peculiar velocity and lensing errors (2209.01359v1)

Published 3 Sep 2022 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.HE, and gr-qc

Abstract: GW number count can be used as a novel tracer of the large scale structure (LSS) in the luminosity distance space (LDS), just like galaxies in the redshift space. It is possible to obtain the $D_L-D_A$ duality relation with clustering effect. However, several LSS induced errors will contaminate the GW luminosity distance measurement, such as the peculiar velocity dispersion error of the host galaxy as well as the foreground lensing magnification. The distance uncertainties induced from these effects will degrade the GW clustering from a spectroscopic-like data down to a photometric-like data. In this paper, we investigate how these LSS induced distance errors modify our cosmological parameter precision inferred from the LDS clustering. We consider two of the next generation GW observatories, namely the Big Bang Observatory (BBO) and the Einstein Telescope (ET). We forecast the parameter estimation errors on the angular diameter distance $D_A$, luminosity distance space Hubble parameter $H_L$ and structure growth rate $f_L\sigma_8$ with a Fisher matrix method. Generally speaking, the GW source clustering data can be used for cosmological studies below $D_L<5$ Gpc, while above this scale the lensing errors will increase significantly. We find that for BBO, it is possible to constrain the cosmological parameters with a relative error of $10{-3}$ to $10{-2}$ below $D_L<5$ Gpc. The velocity dispersion error is dominant in the low luminosity distance range, while the lensing magnification error is the bottleneck in the large luminosity distance range. To reduce the lensing error, we assumed a $50\%$ delensing efficiency. Even with this optimal assumption, the fractional error increased to $O(1)$ at luminosity distance $D_L=25$ Gpc. The results for ET are similar as those from BBO. Due to the GW source number in ET is less than that from BBO, the corresponding results also get a bit worse.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.