Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches (2207.14769v2)
Abstract: Learning-based image quality assessment (IQA) has made remarkable progress in the past decade, but nearly all consider the two key components -- model and data -- in isolation. Specifically, model-centric IQA focuses on developing better'' objective quality methods on fixed and extensively reused datasets, with a great danger of overfitting. Data-centric IQA involves conducting psychophysical experiments to construct
better'' human-annotated datasets, which unfortunately ignores current IQA models during dataset creation. In this paper, we first design a series of experiments to probe computationally that such isolation of model and data impedes further progress of IQA. We then describe a computational framework that integrates model-centric and data-centric IQA. As a specific example, we design computational modules to quantify the sampling-worthiness of candidate images. Experimental results show that the proposed sampling-worthiness module successfully spots diverse failures of the examined blind IQA models, which are indeed worthy samples to be included in next-generation datasets.
- Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1098–1105, 2012.
- Blind image quality assessment based on high order statistics aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(9):4444–4457, 2016.
- dipIQ: Blind image quality assessment by learning-to-rank discriminable image pairs. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(8):3951–3964, 2017a.
- No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(12):4695–4708, 2012.
- RankIQA: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1040–1049, 2017.
- NIMA: Neural image assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(8):3998–4011, 2018.
- Blindly assess image quality in the wild guided by a self-adaptive hyper network. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3667–3676, 2020.
- Uncertainty-aware blind image quality assessment in the laboratory and wild. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30(258):3474–3486, 2021.
- Convolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1733–1740, 2014.
- KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29(305):4041–4056, 2020.
- End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(3):1202–1213, 2017b.
- Blind image quality assessment using a deep bilinear convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 30(1):36–47, 2020.
- Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 26(10):2275–2290, 2015.
- Tie-Yan Liu. Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
- Norm-in-norm loss with faster convergence and better performance for image quality assessment. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 789–797, 2020.
- Semi-supervised deep ensembles for blind image quality assessment. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Weakly Supervised Representation Learning, pages 1–6, 2021.
- Mu Li. Scaling Distributed Machine Learning with System and Algorithm Co-design. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2017.
- A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(11):3440–3451, 2006.
- No-reference blur assessment of digital pictures based on multifeature classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20(1):64–75, 2011.
- Massive online crowdsourced study of subjective and objective picture quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(1):372–387, 2016.
- Perceptual quality assessment of smartphone photography. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3677–3686, 2020.
- Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. Computer Graphics Forum, 31(8):2478–2491, 2012.
- HodgeRank on random graphs for subjective video quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 14(3):844–857, 2012.
- Active sampling for subjective image quality assessment. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4249–4256, 2014.
- A probabilistic approach to people-centric photo selection and sequencing. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(11):2609–2624, 2017.
- Debiased subjective assessment of real-world image enhancement. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 711–721, 2021.
- Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: A methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. Journal of Vision, 8(12):1–13, 2008.
- I am going MAD: Maximum discrepancy competition for comparing classifiers adaptively. In International Conference on Learning Representations, pages 1–13, 2020.
- Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In International Conference on Learning Representations, pages 1–14, 2015.
- Deep ensemble Bayesian active learning: Addressing the mode collapse issue in Monte Carlo dropout via ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03897, 2018.
- Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach. In International Conference on Learning Representations, pages 1–13, 2018.
- Active learning for regression based on query by committee. In International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, pages 209–218, 2007.
- Dongrui Wu. Pool-based sequential active learning for regression. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 30(5):1348–1359, 2019.
- Blind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20(12):3350–3364, 2011.
- Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(8):3339–3352, 2012.
- Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(1):206–219, 2018.
- ITU-R Recommendation. BT.500-14: Methodologies for the subjective assessment of the quality of television images, 2019. URL https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bt/R-REC-BT.500-14-201910-S!!PDF-E.pdf.
- Subjective image quality assessment with boosted triplet comparisons. IEEE Access, 9:138939–138975, 2021.
- TID2008 - A database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics, 10(4):30–45, 2009.
- Most apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 19(1):1–21, 2010.
- From patches to pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the perceptual space of picture quality. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3575–3585, 2020.
- FRank: A ranking method with fidelity loss. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieva, pages 383–390, 2007.
- Deep residual learning for image recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
- Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016.
- Group maximum differentiation competition: Model comparison with few samples. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(4):851–864, 2020.
- Generalizable no-reference image quality assessment via deep meta-learning. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32(3):1048–1060, 2022.
- Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
- Inconsistency and rank preservation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28(2):205–214, 1984.
- Adaptive greedy approximations. Constructive Approximation, 13(1):57–98, 1997.
- Balas Kausik Natarajan. Sparse approximate solutions to linear systems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(2):227–234, 1995.
- Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, pages 1–15, 2015.
- Max Welling. Herding dynamical weights to learn. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1121–1128, 2009.
- Sparse subspace clustering: Algorithm, theory, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(11):2765–2781, 2013.
- Data-driven exemplar model selection. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 339–346, 2014.
- Learning loss for active learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 93–102, 2019.
- Query by committee. In Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 287–297, 1992.
- Analyzing and modeling the maximum diversity problem by zero-one programming. Decision Sciences, 24(6):1171–1185, 1993.
- Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1026–1034, 2015.
- Peibei Cao (5 papers)
- Dingquan Li (18 papers)
- Kede Ma (57 papers)