Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mathematical Proof Between Generations (2207.04779v1)

Published 8 Jul 2022 in math.HO and cs.LO

Abstract: A proof is one of the most important concepts of mathematics. However, there is a striking difference between how a proof is defined in theory and how it is used in practice. This puts the unique status of mathematics as exact science into peril. Now may be the time to reconcile theory and practice, i.e. precision and intuition, through the advent of computer proof assistants. For the most time this has been a topic for experts in specialized communities. However, mathematical proofs have become increasingly sophisticated, stretching the boundaries of what is humanly comprehensible, so that leading mathematicians have asked for formal verification of their proofs. At the same time, major theorems in mathematics have recently been computer-verified by people from outside of these communities, even by beginning students. This article investigates the gap between the different definitions of a proof and possibilities to build bridges. It is written as a polemic or a collage by different members of the communities in mathematics and computer science at different stages of their careers, challenging well-known preconceptions and exploring new perspectives.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Jonas Bayer (8 papers)
  2. Christoph Benzmüller (41 papers)
  3. Kevin Buzzard (12 papers)
  4. Marco David (5 papers)
  5. Leslie Lamport (9 papers)
  6. Yuri Matiyasevich (8 papers)
  7. Lawrence Paulson (3 papers)
  8. Dierk Schleicher (27 papers)
  9. Benedikt Stock (4 papers)
  10. Efim Zelmanov (18 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.